Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
12JUN

ISW Logs Third Straight Net-Loss Week for Russia

3 min read
09:18UTC

ISW assessed Russia net-lost 12 sq mi between 5 and 12 May and a further 29 sq mi between 12 and 19 May, extending the April territorial-loss pattern as Moscow extended its gasoline export ban through 31 July.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

Three straight net-loss weeks and a fuel-export ban extension are pulling on the same constrained refining base.

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW, a Washington think-tank publishing daily battlefield assessments) assessed Russia net-lost 12 sq mi of territory between 5 and 12 May 2026, then a further 29 sq mi between 12 and 19 May 1. Those are the second and third consecutive net-loss weeks since the pattern first appeared in April , and the 12-19 May figure is the largest single-week net loss recorded since the spring offensive began.

Russia imposed a gasoline export ban through 31 July 2026 in response to refinery damage, extending the April measure first taken when the Kirishi refinery ceased operations . Moscow is now defending a home fuel market and a slipping front at the same time, with the same set of constrained refining outputs feeding both. The extension to the end of July signals the Ministry of Energy does not expect the central-Russia refinery picture to clear inside ten weeks.

Net-loss numbers at this scale do not by themselves indicate Russian collapse. Twelve and 29 square miles in a week are small absolute movements on a thousand-kilometre front; the war has run for years at slower rates. Three consecutive net-loss weeks indicate something narrower: the direction of the trade has flipped. After more than a year of incremental Russian gains in the Donetsk axis, the ledger has gone the other way, briefly.

The pairing with the export ban tightens that signal. Forces that cannot generate sortie volume because their fuel chain is constrained also cannot generate the close-air-support tempo Russian formations have relied on to convert assault losses into ground. The refinery campaign and the front-line ledger are converging on the same week in May.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Researchers at the Institute for the Study of War have been tracking which side is gaining more ground each week. For three weeks in a row from late April to mid-May 2026, Russia lost more ground than it gained. That had not happened since Ukraine's Kursk incursion in August 2024. The numbers are not huge: Russia lost the equivalent of a couple of square miles per week. But the direction matters. Russia had been slowly gaining ground for over a year. The reversal is happening at the same time Ukraine is destroying fuel refineries, which limits how many aircraft sorties Russia can fly and how much fuel reaches frontline vehicles. Russia has also banned petrol exports until the end of July, which is a sign the fuel shortage is serious enough to require emergency domestic rationing.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    If net-loss weeks continue through June, Russian operational commanders face pressure to redeploy units from the Zaporizhzhia-Kherson axes to shore up the Donetsk front, thinning defensive depth in the south.

  • Risk

    Moscow's fuel export ban reduces hard-currency revenue in Q2 at the same moment the Q1 deficit overshoot requires emergency financing, compressing the fiscal runway Bruegel estimates at four to six months.

First Reported In

Update #17 · Istanbul talks, refineries dark, deficit overruns

Eastern Herald· 22 May 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
ISW Logs Third Straight Net-Loss Week for Russia
Two more weeks of net-negative Russian advance, paired with a fuel-export ban extension, suggest the front line and the home fuel market are tightening on the same timeline.
Different Perspectives
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Brent fell to $89.25 on ceasefire probability, not new barrels, with traders voting for Trump's deed over Tehran's denial. Lloyd's has not repriced Hormuz war-risk cover because its trigger requires a UN Security Council resolution or government certification, so tanker insurance costs remain elevated regardless of the spot move.
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan's Mohsin Naqvi was in Tehran for his second visit in under a week, using the Pakistan-Qatar channel that delivered April's ceasefire after an identical public-denial cycle. The channel carries both civilian and military buy-in from Islamabad, the only configuration Iran's split command cannot dismiss as a partial signal.
India
India
India summoned the US Deputy Chief of Mission after three Indian sailors were killed aboard MT Settebello, the first formal grievance from a major non-belligerent directed at US enforcement. Indian seafarers supply roughly 12 per cent of the global maritime workforce; their presence on third-flag Gulf tankers is structurally inevitable regardless of bilateral diplomacy.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC declared Hormuz closed on 11 June while civilian negotiators were on the same mediation channel, then issued no public comment on the MoU framework. Its silence on the framework, rather than any foreign ministry statement, is the operative approval signal; the corps' unilateral Hormuz closure shows it did not treat the diplomatic track as binding on its operations.
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Esmail Baghaei told IRNA that reports of a finalised deal were 'merely speculation' and that Iran had 'not yet made a final decision'. The denial is structurally identical to Iranian foreign ministry statements during the April ceasefire talks, which produced a binding text within 48 hours of the same language.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump cancelled the third strike day and called the MoU 'very strong' and almost ready to sign, while CENTCOM kept tanker enforcement running in the same 24-hour window. The administration is simultaneously withdrawing the military pressure it claims drove the deal and sustaining the enforcement campaign it is trying to trade away.