Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
1JUN

ISW Logs Third Straight Net-Loss Week for Russia

3 min read
08:32UTC

ISW assessed Russia net-lost 12 sq mi between 5 and 12 May and a further 29 sq mi between 12 and 19 May, extending the April territorial-loss pattern as Moscow extended its gasoline export ban through 31 July.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

Three straight net-loss weeks and a fuel-export ban extension are pulling on the same constrained refining base.

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW, a Washington think-tank publishing daily battlefield assessments) assessed Russia net-lost 12 sq mi of territory between 5 and 12 May 2026, then a further 29 sq mi between 12 and 19 May 1. Those are the second and third consecutive net-loss weeks since the pattern first appeared in April , and the 12-19 May figure is the largest single-week net loss recorded since the spring offensive began.

Russia imposed a gasoline export ban through 31 July 2026 in response to refinery damage, extending the April measure first taken when the Kirishi refinery ceased operations . Moscow is now defending a home fuel market and a slipping front at the same time, with the same set of constrained refining outputs feeding both. The extension to the end of July signals the Ministry of Energy does not expect the central-Russia refinery picture to clear inside ten weeks.

Net-loss numbers at this scale do not by themselves indicate Russian collapse. Twelve and 29 square miles in a week are small absolute movements on a thousand-kilometre front; the war has run for years at slower rates. Three consecutive net-loss weeks indicate something narrower: the direction of the trade has flipped. After more than a year of incremental Russian gains in the Donetsk axis, the ledger has gone the other way, briefly.

The pairing with the export ban tightens that signal. Forces that cannot generate sortie volume because their fuel chain is constrained also cannot generate the close-air-support tempo Russian formations have relied on to convert assault losses into ground. The refinery campaign and the front-line ledger are converging on the same week in May.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Researchers at the Institute for the Study of War have been tracking which side is gaining more ground each week. For three weeks in a row from late April to mid-May 2026, Russia lost more ground than it gained. That had not happened since Ukraine's Kursk incursion in August 2024. The numbers are not huge: Russia lost the equivalent of a couple of square miles per week. But the direction matters. Russia had been slowly gaining ground for over a year. The reversal is happening at the same time Ukraine is destroying fuel refineries, which limits how many aircraft sorties Russia can fly and how much fuel reaches frontline vehicles. Russia has also banned petrol exports until the end of July, which is a sign the fuel shortage is serious enough to require emergency domestic rationing.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    If net-loss weeks continue through June, Russian operational commanders face pressure to redeploy units from the Zaporizhzhia-Kherson axes to shore up the Donetsk front, thinning defensive depth in the south.

  • Risk

    Moscow's fuel export ban reduces hard-currency revenue in Q2 at the same moment the Q1 deficit overshoot requires emergency financing, compressing the fiscal runway Bruegel estimates at four to six months.

First Reported In

Update #17 · Istanbul talks, refineries dark, deficit overruns

Eastern Herald· 22 May 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
ISW Logs Third Straight Net-Loss Week for Russia
Two more weeks of net-negative Russian advance, paired with a fuel-export ban extension, suggest the front line and the home fuel market are tightening on the same timeline.
Different Perspectives
Human rights monitors (Hengaw, Amnesty International, Iran HRM)
Human rights monitors (Hengaw, Amnesty International, Iran HRM)
Monitors documented a second death sentence for Zahra Tabari, 68, reported cemetery record deletions at Behesht-e Zahra, and a poll showing 81.5% of medical residents want to emigrate, against a background of 200+ confirmed executions since February. Iran's security courts operate at uninterrupted wartime tempo regardless of the diplomatic track.
Pakistan (mediator)
Pakistan (mediator)
Islamabad carried Trump's revised MOU demanding HEU destruction to Iranian negotiators, formally inheriting the role of sole active mediator after Oman's forced withdrawal. Pakistan lacks Oman's banking infrastructure for frozen-asset routing and carries its own regional stakes, making it a less structurally neutral broker.
Kuwait
Kuwait
Kuwait intercepted Iranian missiles and drones for a second time in days on 1 June, with air-raid sirens sounding nationwide, after invoking Article 51 self-defence on 28 May following the Ali Al Salem ballistic-missile strike. The repeated interceptions test whether Kuwait's domestic politics can sustain hosting US forces as a de facto co-belligerent.
China (PRC)
China (PRC)
Beijing sent scholars to Shangri-La rather than its defence minister and addressed Taiwan without mentioning Iran, maintaining bilateral energy corridor protection with Tehran while refusing diplomatic exposure at multilateral forums. Trump barred China as an HEU custodian on 27 May, removing Beijing from the deal architecture while China continues supplying DPI hardware that caps Iran's internet.
Lloyd's of London / war-risk underwriters
Lloyd's of London / war-risk underwriters
Lloyd's held its Hormuz war-risk designation at $10-14 million per voyage while Brent recovered to $93.91, maintaining the structural divergence from futures pricing that has persisted since late May. Underwriters require a UN Security Council resolution or government certification letter, not diplomatic optimism.
Gulf Cooperation Council states (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar)
Gulf Cooperation Council states (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar)
Five Gulf states wrote to the IMO on 21 May rejecting Iran's PGSA transit authority over international waters; Saudi Arabia and the UAE have not confirmed participation in the European Hormuz mission. The GCC is navigating between US security guarantees and exposure to Iranian fire, with no Gulf state formally co-belligerent except Kuwait.