Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
25MAY

Cooper: 90% of Iran's mines cleared

3 min read
13:55UTC

Admiral Brad Cooper, CENTCOM commander, told a Washington defence forum on Thursday 14 May that US operations had cleared 'roughly 90 per cent' of Iran's naval mine inventory and that Iran's military threat is 'diminished but not eliminated'.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Cooper claimed CENTCOM cleared 90 per cent of Iran's naval mines with no published methodology.

Admiral Brad Cooper, CENTCOM commander, told a Washington defence forum on Thursday 14 May that US operations had cleared 'roughly 90 per cent' of Iran's naval mine inventory and that Iran's military threat is 'diminished but not eliminated', as reported by Defense News 1. The figure arrived with no published methodology and no independent corroboration.

Cooper's previous '100 per cent halt' claim had been contradicted by Windward, The National, and LSEG, citing the 61-vessel redirection count of 10 May and the earlier 58-redirect baseline . The 90 per cent figure does not state whether it counts mines destroyed in situ, deactivated in storage, neutralised by sweep, or simply absent from a sensor pass at the Larak-Qeshm corridor between Iranian islands. Defense News asked for clarification on methodology and CENTCOM did not provide one.

Counter-perspective: independent analysts at IISS and CSIS have noted that mine-counter-measures statistics are inherently denominator problems, because Iran has never published its mine inventory and Western estimates range from 3,000 to 6,000 weapons across pre-war stockpiles. A 90 per cent claim against an unknown denominator could simultaneously be technically accurate and operationally meaningless. CENTCOM has not addressed this in its public communications.

Pete Hegseth's Article 2 testimony on Tuesday 12 May rests on CENTCOM's operational credibility, and the Alaskan senator's constitutional deadline is days from expiry . A second challenged Cooper figure within four weeks of the first would erode that evidentiary foundation just as the constitutional clock runs down. The Larak-Qeshm corridor remains the test surface: a single mined-vessel incident there would settle the dispute empirically.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The top US military commander in the Middle East, Admiral Brad Cooper, told a Washington forum on 14 May that US forces have destroyed or neutralised roughly 90% of Iran's sea mines in the Strait of Hormuz. P&I insurers require independent verification of that kind of claim before they will reopen war-risk cover for the strait. Cooper's previous claim, that US operations had achieved a '100% halt' of Iranian shipping interference, was directly contradicted by three independent maritime tracking firms: Windward, The National, and LSEG. The 90% figure arrived with no explanation of how it was calculated, and the US Defense Intelligence Agency's 2025 estimate put Iran's total mine inventory at between 2,000 and 5,000 units, a baseline Cooper has not published.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

CENTCOM's operational communication cadence has a structural incentive to issue progress claims before the War Powers Act 60-day reporting deadline passes. The WPA requires the president to seek congressional authorisation within 60 days of introducing forces into hostilities; Cooper's forum statement on 14 May arrived with the deadline approaching on 19 May.

A commander's public assessment of 90% mine clearance provides the executive branch with a 'success narrative' that reduces congressional pressure for an AUMF without actually closing the legal gap.

The previous '100% halt' claim that Windward, The National, and LSEG contradicted reflects the same structural pressure: CENTCOM's public posture must support the White House's no-congressional-authorisation stance by projecting mission success. The downgrade from 100% to 90% may represent intelligence revision, but the public communication timing is politically determined, not operationally driven.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Cooper's two successive challenged mine-clearance claims, first 100% halt then 90% neutralised, erode the evidentiary foundation for Pete Hegseth's Article 2 justification if a third independent contradiction emerges from Windward or LSEG.

    Short term · 0.76
  • Consequence

    P&I insurance underwriters require independent mine-clearance verification, not a US military commander's forum statement, before war-risk cover can reopen; the 90% claim does not move that threshold.

    Immediate · 0.85
  • Meaning

    The WPA deadline of 19 May creates a structural incentive for CENTCOM to issue progress claims in the five days prior; the 14 May forum statement falls within that window and should be read with that context.

    Immediate · 0.79
First Reported In

Update #99 · Two Hormuz papers; Washington on neither

Defense News· 16 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Lloyd's of London
Lloyd's of London
The Joint War Committee left Hormuz war-risk premiums at $10-14 million per voyage on 25 May, declining to move on Brent's 5% fall. The JWC's protocol requires a UN Security Council resolution or bilateral government certification letter before de-listing, and neither has arrived: a verbal understanding does not satisfy the formal condition the reinsurance market's treaty terms require.
Gulf Arab producers
Gulf Arab producers
Saudi Arabia and UAE depend on Hormuz for their own crude exports; Aramco CEO Nasser has warned no oil market recovery arrives until 2027 if the blockade continues past mid-June. Monday's $98.96 Brent settlement shortens nothing for Gulf producers without a signed instrument and a Pentagon mine-clearance timeline that runs up to six months post-ceasefire.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar holds $12bn of frozen Iranian assets at the centre of the sequencing dispute but cannot release them without explicit US Treasury authorisation, given the original freeze was a US instrument. As the asset-holding state, Qatar's leverage is real but passive: it is the escrow holder, not the decision-maker, and any resolution requires US Treasury sign-off that Trump has withheld.
Pakistan
Pakistan
With both Prime Minister Sharif and army chief Munir simultaneously in Beijing on 25 May, Pakistan has for the first time consolidated its civilian and military mediation tracks under China's roof. Munir's direct Tehran-to-Beijing flight signals that the security and financial threads of the sequencing problem are now being worked in parallel rather than sequentially.
China
China
Beijing hosted Pakistan's principal mediators and Iran's China envoy Ghalibaf simultaneously on 25 May while its banking regulator capped new state-bank lending to five sanctioned refiners. China is simultaneously the most credible third-party underwriter of the $12bn sequencing and the state whose institutions face live OFAC secondary-sanctions exposure if the deadlock persists through GL V's expiry.
United States
United States
Trump posted on 24 May that the blockade holds until a deal is certified and signed, ruling out the informal MOU structure both sides had been building. The 'certified, and signed' condition is the first operational bar Trump has attached in 87 days, but it arrived without an executive instrument, maintaining the gap between posted ultimatum and signed US policy.