Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
25MAY

China splits on Hengli before Trump-Xi

4 min read
13:55UTC

Bloomberg confirmed on 7 May that China's NFRA quietly ordered the four largest state banks to halt new yuan loans to Hengli Petrochemical and four other sanctioned refineries, while MOFCOM publicly told the same firms to defy OFAC.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

China is de-risking Hengli loans behind closed doors while publicly telling the same banks to defy Washington.

The National Financial Regulatory Administration (NFRA) privately instructed China's four largest state banks before 1 May to halt new yuan loans to Hengli Petrochemical and four other US-sanctioned refineries, Bloomberg confirmed on 7 May 1. The four banks are ICBC, Agricultural Bank of China, China Construction Bank and Bank of China. Existing credit was not called. On 2 May, the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) publicly told the same five firms to defy OFAC under Announcement No. 21, activating Beijing's 2021 Blocking Rules .

Beijing wrote the contradiction on purpose. The four banks are observing the NFRA stop-loan order while ignoring MOFCOM's defiance instruction in practice: they treat their Hengli loan books as the binding constraint, not Beijing's public posture. China complies quietly where state-bank balance sheets would take the loss and defies publicly where the cost is rhetorical.

The calendar is what makes the dual signal load-bearing. The 24 May wind-down deadline for General Licence V (GL-V), OFAC's authorisation for orderly Hengli wind-down, falls 16 days out. The Trump-Xi summit in Beijing falls in 6 days, on 14-15 May. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed Iran will be on the summit agenda, and CNBC reported the Iran focus may delay tariff and rare-earth progress 2. The summit is not expected to produce a written China-side sanctions instrument on Iran. Its function will be diplomatic pressure on Tehran to accept the MOU sequencing now sitting in Araghchi's ministry.

One reading casts NFRA's order as Beijing taking out balance-sheet insurance against an MOU collapse. If Iran's reply expires without a deal and Trump tightens enforcement, the four banks have already stopped extending credit they would have to write off. If the MOU is signed, GL-V is extended or moot, and the NFRA instruction was a low-cost piece of risk management that produced a domestic-defiance narrative as a side effect.

A second reading runs through audience design. NFRA's quiet bank instruction and MOFCOM's public order are addressed to the same five firms simultaneously. Beijing complies at the balance-sheet level (satisfying Western counterparty risk managers) while maintaining the rhetorical posture of sovereign defiance (satisfying domestic audience and Tehran). If MOFCOM Announcement No. 21 is later quietly withdrawn, the public posture becomes stranded without a formal mechanism. The summit outcome will determine which reading lands, with Donald Trump and Xi Jinping facing each other on 14 May.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

China sent two conflicting signals about Iran on 7 May. Quietly, China's banking regulator told the country's four biggest banks to stop making new loans to a large Chinese oil refinery that America has sanctioned. Publicly, China's trade ministry told the same refinery to ignore American sanctions entirely. Both instructions came from the Chinese government at the same time. The reason: the banking instruction protects Chinese banks from US financial penalties (the banks can be cut off from doing dollar business globally if they break US sanctions), while the public statement keeps China's political position aligned with Iran. Six days before the Trump-Xi summit, Beijing has already privately given ground while publicly holding firm.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

China's four largest state banks hold US dollar correspondent relationships that generate fee income on billions of non-Iran transactions daily. OFAC can threaten to revoke those relationships under secondary-sanctions authority, making the banks' willingness to extend new Hengli credit a function of dollar-clearing exposure rather than domestic MOFCOM instructions.

The NFRA stop-loan order pre-empts that leverage by removing the new-credit exposure before Trump can threaten it at the summit. MOFCOM Announcement No. 21 preserves the public posture for domestic and Iran-facing audiences while the banks quietly de-risk the balance-sheet vulnerability that would otherwise become Washington's negotiating chip.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Beijing arrives at the 14-15 May Trump-Xi summit already partially compliant at the balance-sheet level, giving Xi a concession to surface without making it publicly, while retaining the MOFCOM defiance posture as a withdrawable bargaining chip.

  • Risk

    If the summit produces no bilateral Iran framework, GL-V's 24 May deadline becomes the next chokepoint: OFAC must either extend the wind-down window or begin enforcement against Hengli, forcing a visible Chinese state-bank compliance decision.

First Reported In

Update #91 · MOU in Tehran, missiles in the strait

Bloomberg (via The Trending People)· 8 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Lloyd's of London
Lloyd's of London
The Joint War Committee left Hormuz war-risk premiums at $10-14 million per voyage on 25 May, declining to move on Brent's 5% fall. The JWC's protocol requires a UN Security Council resolution or bilateral government certification letter before de-listing, and neither has arrived: a verbal understanding does not satisfy the formal condition the reinsurance market's treaty terms require.
Gulf Arab producers
Gulf Arab producers
Saudi Arabia and UAE depend on Hormuz for their own crude exports; Aramco CEO Nasser has warned no oil market recovery arrives until 2027 if the blockade continues past mid-June. Monday's $98.96 Brent settlement shortens nothing for Gulf producers without a signed instrument and a Pentagon mine-clearance timeline that runs up to six months post-ceasefire.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar holds $12bn of frozen Iranian assets at the centre of the sequencing dispute but cannot release them without explicit US Treasury authorisation, given the original freeze was a US instrument. As the asset-holding state, Qatar's leverage is real but passive: it is the escrow holder, not the decision-maker, and any resolution requires US Treasury sign-off that Trump has withheld.
Pakistan
Pakistan
With both Prime Minister Sharif and army chief Munir simultaneously in Beijing on 25 May, Pakistan has for the first time consolidated its civilian and military mediation tracks under China's roof. Munir's direct Tehran-to-Beijing flight signals that the security and financial threads of the sequencing problem are now being worked in parallel rather than sequentially.
China
China
Beijing hosted Pakistan's principal mediators and Iran's China envoy Ghalibaf simultaneously on 25 May while its banking regulator capped new state-bank lending to five sanctioned refiners. China is simultaneously the most credible third-party underwriter of the $12bn sequencing and the state whose institutions face live OFAC secondary-sanctions exposure if the deadlock persists through GL V's expiry.
United States
United States
Trump posted on 24 May that the blockade holds until a deal is certified and signed, ruling out the informal MOU structure both sides had been building. The 'certified, and signed' condition is the first operational bar Trump has attached in 87 days, but it arrived without an executive instrument, maintaining the gap between posted ultimatum and signed US policy.