Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Tech Sovereignty
4AUG

Iran's heir skips the funeral for him

2 min read
10:16UTC

Mojtaba Khamenei, installed as Supreme Leader by a boycotted March vote, stayed away from the Tehran state funeral staged to cement his succession, which opened on 4 July. Iran offered no reason.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

The heir Iran's funeral was built to legitimise stayed away from it.

Mojtaba Khamenei did not appear at his father's state funeral, which opened in Tehran on 4 July. Iranian officials gave no reason for the absence. Western reporting attributes it to the standing Israeli assassination threat, after Defence Minister Israel Katz called him "a dead man" on 1 July , and to unhealed injuries from the February strike that killed his father 1.

An emergency online Assembly of Experts vote installed Mojtaba as Supreme Leader in March, the first dynastic succession in the Islamic Republic's 47-year history; eight members boycotted it. The funeral was staged to wrap that contested vote in visible national grief for the man now holding the office. He was the one mourner it could not afford to lose, and it lost him.

Mojtaba Khamenei has not been seen in public since 8 March and governs through sealed handwritten notes carried with a three-to-five-day lag. A leader who cannot attend the largest state occasion of his tenure still rests his authority on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran's ideological military, rather than his own presence. Katz's threat is genuine, but a Supreme Leader who must hide from it pays a domestic price in a state whose legitimacy runs through public appearance.

Qatar confirmed the Doha negotiating channel pauses for the six-day funeral , and Washington signed nothing new on Iran through the mourning week. Trump called the last Doha round "a day of very good meetings", a verdict the empty Federal Register does not back . The last US instrument remains General License X (GL X), the 22 June oil-sanctions waiver authorising Iranian crude sales through 21 August.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's top religious and political leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in an Israeli strike in February. His son, Mojtaba Khamenei, took over as Supreme Leader in March, the first time power has passed directly from father to son in Iran. On 4 July, Iran held a state funeral for the father in Tehran. Mojtaba did not show up, and officials never said why. For a leader whose own claim to the job is only four months old, skipping his own father's funeral without explanation raises an obvious question: is he staying away for safety, since Israel's defence minister had just called him a target, or is something else wrong at the top of Iran's government?

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz called Mojtaba Khamenei 'a dead man' on 1 July , a threat Iran's own foreign ministry took seriously enough to warn of an 'immediate and powerful response'. A Supreme Leader whose predecessor died in a targeted strike four months earlier has a concrete security reason to avoid a fixed six-day public itinerary that Israeli intelligence would have advance notice of.

Iran's own military posture reinforces that reading. The Army was already moving extra Ground Force units to the borders and putting Air Defence Force units on continuous watch ahead of the funeral , with a full airspace closure over Tehran from 6 July. A state treating its own capital as a live target during six days of mass gatherings is unlikely to expose the one man both Israel and its own succession process have made a distinct target.

First Reported In

Update #145 · Iran's heir skips the funeral built for him

The Week· 4 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Germany (Bundeskartellamt)
Germany (Bundeskartellamt)
Germany's Bundeskartellamt declined to open antitrust proceedings against SAP, the company disclosed on 30 July, in the same fortnight the Commission's EUR 890m DMA fine against Google approached its 21 September compliance deadline. A German software champion cleared domestic scrutiny while an American platform faces enforcement, in the same regulatory season.
United States (USTR)
United States (USTR)
Washington's Section 301 investigation into EU digital enforcement, opened 24 July, had produced no Federal Register docket as of 4 August, even as Dell and 1,008 Nvidia GB200 NVL4 accelerators sit inside the EU's own sovereignty-branded MeluXina-AI build. The absent docket and the American hardware inside a European sovereignty project pull the same relationship in opposite directions.
UK government
UK government
The UK's Sovereign AI vehicle took a nine-figure equity stake in chip startup OLIX on 30 July, its fifth deal since April, while the Cabinet Office's 27 July fact sheet named no accounting officer for the GBP 1.1bn AI Hardware Plan. Whitehall is buying equity rather than capacity, inside a department mid-rename to Business, Innovation, Science and Trade.
Luxembourg government
Luxembourg government
Luxembourg is covering half of the newly disclosed EUR 80m contract value for MeluXina-AI, EuroHPC's Grand Duchy build, with Dell Technologies confirmed as supplying 1,008 Nvidia GB200 NVL4 accelerators, a hardware detail absent from the earlier project description. The disclosure means Luxembourg's national co-funding buys a facility built on American silicon under a European ownership badge.
European Commission
European Commission
The Commission activated its Article 101 fining power on 2 August while the Article 70 register it must keep current still showed a 26 September 2025 footer and blank rows for Denmark, Finland and Hungary. It issued no comment, though Article 70 puts the publication duty on Brussels, not member states.
China's Ministry of Commerce
China's Ministry of Commerce
Spokesperson He Yadong said on 16 July that Beijing and the Netherlands should let firms settle the Nexperia dispute through consultation, after a Dutch ministerial visit to Beijing. The conciliatory tone contrasts with the confrontational US trade response to the same fortnight's DMA enforcement.