Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
15JUN

Baltic strikes cut Russian oil by 43%

2 min read
11:33UTC

Four drone strikes on Baltic terminals collapsed Russia's seaborne crude shipments by 43%, costing Moscow roughly $1 billion in seven days.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Ukraine physically halved Russian oil exports in one week, replacing weakened sanctions with infrastructure destruction.

Ukrainian drones struck Ust-Luga and Primorsk, Russia's two largest Baltic oil export terminals, at least four times between 22 and 31 March. Together these ports handle roughly 60% of Russia's seaborne oil flow. Weekly crude exports fell from 4.07 million barrels per day to 2.32 million bpd, a 43% collapse 1. Bloomberg data shows this is the steepest single-week drop in modern Russian export history. Revenue fell from $2.45 billion to $1.44 billion.

On 26 and 27 March, no ships recorded loading oil at any of Russia's three Baltic ports. Two consecutive zero-loading days had not occurred since 2022. President Zelenskyy framed the campaign as deliberate policy: "Unlike most countries, Ukraine has its own sanctions: its long-range capabilities." The logic is strategic. On 12 March, the US Treasury waived sanctions on approximately 124 million barrels of Russian oil at sea , valued by Zelenskyy at roughly $10 billion. That waiver expires on 11 April. When international enforcement weakens, Ukraine destroys the pipes.

The contrast with the revenue picture two weeks earlier is sharp. CREA data showed Russia earning €510 million per day in fossil fuel revenues during the Iran war's first fortnight . The Urals benchmark has since risen $11.30 to $73.24 per barrel, well above the $59 budget assumption. High prices mean nothing if tankers cannot load. Ukrainian strikes on the Labinsk oil depot targeted inland storage; the Baltic campaign targets the revenue stream itself.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Russia earns most of its money from selling oil and gas. The two big Baltic Sea oil ports, Ust-Luga and Primorsk, are where roughly 60% of Russia's oil tankers fill up before sailing to buyers in India, China, and elsewhere. Ukraine struck those ports with drones at least four times in ten days. For two days in a row, not a single tanker loaded oil at any Russian Baltic port. In one week, Russia's oil shipments fell by 43%, costing Moscow roughly $1 billion. Why target these ports? Three weeks earlier, the US government had temporarily waived oil sanctions, allowing Russia to sell oil that had been blocked. Ukraine is destroying the ports that ship that oil, compensating for weakened financial pressure with physical damage.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Ukraine's decision to target Baltic export infrastructure stems from the 12 March US Treasury sanctions waivers, which released 124 million barrels of Russian oil and provided an estimated $10 billion in revenue. Zelenskyy explicitly linked the two: if international mechanisms cannot enforce financial pressure, Ukraine will enforce it physically.

The tactical opportunity arose from Russia's post-2022 export concentration. Having lost European pipeline markets, Russia routed 60% of seaborne crude through Ust-Luga and Primorsk. That concentration, a consequence of Western sanctions forcing rerouting, created the target Ukraine exploited.

Escalation

Ukraine has escalated from striking military and logistics targets to directly targeting Russia's primary hard-currency revenue stream. This crosses a threshold. Russia's asymmetric response options include intensified grid attacks on Ukraine's own energy export capacity and accelerated Shahed barrages, but neither matches the $1 billion weekly revenue impact.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Russia's seaborne crude export capacity may remain suppressed for months if Ust-Luga and Primorsk cannot resume full operations before the 11 April sanctions waiver expires.

    Short term · 0.75
  • Risk

    Russia may retaliate against Ukrainian energy export infrastructure, including Odesa port facilities, to impose a symmetric revenue cost.

    Immediate · 0.65
  • Precedent

    Ukraine has established that drone strikes on export infrastructure can substitute for sanctions enforcement, a model other non-state and state actors may adopt.

    Long term · 0.7
First Reported In

Update #9 · Ukraine halves Russia's Baltic oil exports

Bloomberg via Moscow Times· 1 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.