12AUG

DIU ranks Gauntlet II drone winners

3 min read

14:17UTC

The Pentagon's contest for cheap attack drones named its winners and about 60,000 drones of orders, while the first round's deliveries ran about 60 per cent complete.

← Back to Chinese cameras in the Navy's robot boats Jump to analysis ↓

TechnologyDeveloping

Key takeaway

Gauntlet II named its winners while Gauntlet I suppliers had delivered only about 60 per cent of orders.

The Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), the Pentagon's office for buying commercial technology, ranked the winners of Gauntlet II on 18 September⁠¹. Gauntlet II is the second round of the Pentagon's fly-off contest to pick suppliers of cheap attack drones. DIU named five vendors in each of two categories, deep strike and close-quarters work, and officials put orders at about 60,000 drones. The round had been cut to 19 finalists in July.

Neros, the only firm on both lists, announced a 14,000-drone order worth more than US$100m on 30 September⁠². In an earlier Pentagon attack-drone buy, only 43 per cent of the Archer drones Neros shipped cleared acceptance.

The first round's record sits underneath the new orders. Vendors had delivered 13,440 of the 22,320 drones ordered in Gauntlet I by 25 August, about 60 per cent, according to Inside Unmanned Systems as relayed by DroneXL⁠³. Only three vendors delivered in full, one of them Ukrainian Defense Drones. The roughly 8,880 drones still undelivered from Gauntlet I are being moved to the firms that ship.

AeroVironment, which reported record full-year revenue of US$1.98bn in June, shows the same gap from the supplier's side. On 9 September it said its funded backlog, the value of signed and funded orders not yet delivered, reached a record US$1.5bn at 1 August, up 37 per cent on a year earlier⁠⁴. First-quarter revenue rose 6 per cent, to US$480.5m.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The Pentagon runs contests called Gauntlets to choose which companies will supply cheap attack drones. Firms fly their drones in tests, and the best performers win orders. The second contest has named ten winners, and the military plans to buy tens of thousands of drones from them. Companies that won the first contest have struggled to build and deliver drones fast enough, so the Pentagon is moving orders to the few firms that have delivered on time.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Most of the ten Gauntlet II winners are young firms with limited factory capacity. A contest can pick the best design in weeks, but building thousands of drones a month needs parts, staff and floor space that most entrants lack.

The programme's own rules sharpen the pressure. Moving undelivered units to vendors that ship punishes delay quickly, and it also hands extra volume to firms that already have the most capacity.

What could happen next?

Risk
Reallocation to on-time vendors may leave US small attack-drone supply concentrated on Neros.
Consequence
Gauntlet 2.5 and Gauntlet 3 give firms that failed to place a fresh chance within months.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: Gauntlet's first stage at Camp Grayling in June tested 49 companies and 79 drones, with price ceilings of US$5,500 for long-range and US$4,500 for close-quarters airframes (ID:4528). DIU then cut the field to 19 finalists and now to ten winners, a funnel in which each stage narrows supply.

Counter-parallel: Japan's interceptor trial in August left a single survivor out of dozens of proposals, making that maker the default supplier. DIU's two boards of five keep more firms in play, though the reallocation rule still rewards whichever of them ships on time.

By Lowdown's calculation, Neros's order works out at more than about US$7,100 a drone, and Swarm Defense Technologies' 4,000-drone order of at least US$25m at more than about US$6,250. Both sit above the Gauntlet II airframe ceilings, which suggests the orders include kit or support beyond the aircraft; neither firm has published a breakdown.

AeroVironment's results show where the money is heading at the larger end of the market. Its first-quarter bookings reached US$0.7bn for a book-to-bill ratio of 1.4, and gross margin rose to 26 per cent from 21 per cent.

Consensus view: DefenseScoop reports the Defense Innovation Unit widening the contest rather than slowing it, with a 'bomber' Gauntlet 2.5 due next month and Gauntlet 3 about six months after Gauntlet II ends. On that view a rolling series of fly-offs keeps new makers entering and keeps prices under pressure.

Counter-view: Inside Unmanned Systems' Gauntlet I figures, relayed by DroneXL, show only Neros, Ukrainian Defense Drones and Griffon Aerospace completing their orders. Volume moved from late vendors to those that shipped, including 800 drones reassigned to Neros, so the contest is concentrating real orders on a few firms.

Key tension: Whether repeated competitions widen the supplier base, or whether reallocating orders to the firms that deliver leaves the Pentagon dependent on two or three makers.

Sources:DefenseScoop·DroneXL·AeroVironment (SEC filing)

Mentions:Defense Innovation Unit →Gauntlet II →Neros →Drone Dominance →Gauntlet I →Defense Drones Tech Corp →AeroVironment →DroneXL →Camp Grayling →DefenseScoop →Japan →Pentagon →Inside Unmanned Systems →Griffon Aerospace →Swarm Defense Technologies →

First Reported In

Update #18 · Four EU states skip tenders on drone defence

DefenseScoop· 1 Oct 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Pentagon orders 120 drones in five weeks

Gauntlet II's 19 finalists from July were ranked into ten winners.

Occurred 1 Jul 2026

Read story →

Pentagon's drone buy lands a third short

Gauntlet I delivery shortfalls led to undelivered volume moving to firms that ship, including Neros.

Occurred 7 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

DIU ranks Gauntlet II drone winners

The Pentagon is ordering attack drones faster than its suppliers have so far delivered them.

Led to

Hegseth plans a four-star drone command

Drone Dominance and Gauntlet are among the efforts the new command is meant to scale.

Occurred 30 Sept 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

Conservative opposition

The Conservative opposition called on the Government on 9 August to 'urgently audit' equipment for hidden Chinese components, after the Telegraph's K3 SCOUT report. No named MP has been quoted on the record; the call came at party level, alongside the Ministry of Defence's own 10 August statement that no data had been compromised.

Kraken Technology Group

Kraken Technology Group is a UK maritime-defence company based in Portsmouth that builds the K3 SCOUT, and crossed a $1bn valuation in July on a single-sourced $175m raise. The camera components reached the fleet under a third party's written security assurance, which the Platform Authority, which does not yet exist, was never positioned to check.

Navy Commercial

Navy Commercial at Whale Island published two notices on 5 August: 074032-2026, asking industry how to build a Platform Authority to certify uncrewed vessels, and 074351-2026, a GBP10m multi-role USV testbed for the Defence Chief Technology Officer. Responses on the Platform Authority close 19 August, ten days after the cameras were found transmitting to China.

HUMAIN

HUMAIN and Applied Intuition stated a 2030 target for thousands of autonomous trucks on Saudi logistics corridors. The announcement disclosed no order, fleet baseline or contract value.

Saildrone

Saildrone and Lockheed Martin demonstrated two JAGM launches from a Surveyor-class vessel at RIMPAC. The accepted record identifies no requirement, customer or production configuration behind the demonstration.

Taiwan Legislative Yuan

Taiwan's Legislative Yuan passed the Act at third reading with a small suicide uncrewed boat on the named development list. The NT$240 billion ceiling covers all unmanned domains, and the Act was not promulgated by 4 September.