Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
6JUN

Ohio Senate race draws $44.1m in a week

3 min read
12:16UTC

Outside groups filed $44.1 million in Ohio's Senate race between 24 and 30 September, led by Defend American Jobs, which the Washington Times ties to the crypto industry's Fairshake network.

PoliticsAssessed
Key takeaway

Republican-side groups outspent Democratic ones nearly three to one in Ohio's Senate race in late September.

Outside groups filed $44.10 million of independent expenditures in Ohio's Senate race in 116 lines between 24 and 30 September, by Lowdown's sum of notices to the Federal Election Commission (FEC)⁠1. Federal election law bars the groups behind such spending from working with a campaign. Senator Jon Husted, the Republican, faces Sherrod Brown, the Democrat who lost his seat in 2024.

The largest spender was Defend American Jobs, with $11.46 million, almost all of it in two lines split to the cent: $5,713,491.28 supporting Husted and $5,713,491.27 opposing Brown. The Washington Times reports that the committee belongs to the network of Fairshake, the crypto industry's political action committee (PAC), which has said it will spend $30 million against Brown⁠2. The ads do not mention cryptocurrency, the paper reports. At the same point in 2024, according to the same report, Defend American Jobs had spent $40 million backing Bernie Moreno, who beat Brown.

Behind it came the Senate Leadership Fund (SLF), the Republican Senate leadership's Super PAC, which files with the FEC as SLF PAC, put $10.34 million against Brown, and WinSenate, a Democratic-aligned Super PAC, with $10.33 million against Husted. No Going Back PAC added $4.93 million, after $5.82 million in Ohio the previous week.

By Lowdown's sum of the named committees, Republican-side groups filed about $31.1 million in the week and Democratic-side groups about $11.3 million. That puts close to three dollars of outside money behind Husted for every one behind Brown. It comes on top of the $10.03 million of party spending with Husted that the National Republican Senatorial Committee reported for August.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Ohio is electing a US senator this November. The Republican is Jon Husted, who was appointed to the seat in 2025. The Democrat is Sherrod Brown, who held Ohio's other Senate seat until he lost in 2024. Outside groups, mostly super PACs that can spend unlimited sums on adverts, reported $44.1 million in a single week. The biggest spender was Defend American Jobs, which the Washington Times links to cryptocurrency companies. super PACs must report their spending quickly, but the reports do not say what an advert is about. That is why the crypto connection comes from reporting rather than the filings.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Ohio is a special election for the seat JD Vance left when he became vice-president, which puts an appointed senator, Husted, against a former three-term senator, Brown. Both sides start with high name recognition, so money goes into attack adverts rather than introductions.

The Republican side also draws on party money. The NRSC, the Senate Republicans' campaign arm, reported $10.03m of what the FEC classes as coordinated party expenditure with Husted's campaign in August . Outside groups now add to that, and No Going Back PAC put in $4.93m after $5.82m the week before .

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    A single industry-funded committee targeting the same candidate in consecutive cycles tests whether a repeat campaign works as well as the first.

  • Consequence

    Republican-side money in Ohio ran about $31.1m to $11.3m in one week of filings, leaving Brown's campaign to close the gap itself.

First Reported In

Update #19 · Bulk voter citizenship checks are back

Federal Election Commission· 1 Oct 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Judge Adolf Zeman, Alaska Superior Court
Judge Adolf Zeman, Alaska Superior Court
Zeman refused to dismiss the League of Women Voters, Alaska Black Caucus and ACLU of Alaska suit over the state giving DOJ its unredacted voter list. The privacy claims now go to evidence-gathering under the Alaska Constitution.
Judge Thomas Schroeder, US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Judge Thomas Schroeder, US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Schroeder refused on 19 October to block the State Board of Elections rule that rejects mail ballots with an unsealed or missing inner envelope. He found the challengers had delayed and that relief was infeasible with voting under way, and pointed to notice-and-cure provisions as a safeguard.
Stephen Richer, Republican former Maricopa County recorder
Stephen Richer, Republican former Maricopa County recorder
Richer submitted a brief on 20 October supporting the voting groups on documentary proof of citizenship at registration. He takes no position on the separate 90-day voter-removal question.
Senate Leadership Fund
Senate Leadership Fund
The Senate Leadership Fund began spending for interim Senator Darline Graham Nordone on 19 October, taking its South Carolina total to $4.06m, including $2.25m against Democrat Annie Andrews. Republicans are now paying to defend a seat in a state Donald Trump carried in 2024.
WinSenate, the ad-buying affiliate of Senate Majority PAC
WinSenate, the ad-buying affiliate of Senate Majority PAC
WinSenate began buying Kansas airtime against Roger Marshall on 10 October and had reported $8.14m there by 20 October. Marshall held $922,088 in cash on 30 September and the NRSC gave him no party money in September, so the Democratic side is spending where the Republican committee has not.
County Board of Arlington County
County Board of Arlington County
Arlington says federal Polling Place Policies allowing armed agents at polling sites breach 18 USC 592, the 1865 ban on troops or armed men at an election. It reads Markwayne Mullin's 1 September remarks as confirming such a policy, and asks Judge Brinkema to keep armed federal staff from its polls and drop boxes.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.