Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
27OCT

Dhillon plans 1,000 DOJ poll monitors

3 min read
13:20UTC

Harmeet Dhillon said the Justice Department will send about 1,000 election monitors in November; a day later a Seattle judge threw out its suit for Washington's voter rolls.

PoliticsAssessed
Key takeaway

The Justice Department is sending monitors to the polls while losing its fights for state voter rolls.

Harmeet Dhillon, the Assistant Attorney General who runs the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, said on 22 September that the department would send about 1,000 election monitors in November⁠1. She named Nevada, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island as destinations. Dhillon called it "the biggest DOJ election observer effort in history" and said the division had brought 67 election-related indictments and convictions this cycle, against 13 under the Biden administration. She also described a new protocol: when monitors flag signs of fraud, she will ring the relevant US Attorney, the federal prosecutor for that district, herself. Nevada's place on the list follows the department's letter telling its secretary of state, Francisco Aguilar, that he is personally under investigation.

The department's courtroom record ran the other way the next day. Judge Kymberly Evanson of the federal district court in Seattle dismissed its suit for Washington's full voter rolls on 23 September⁠2. She found its reading of the National Voter Registration Act, the Help America Vote Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1960 unpersuasive. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown counts that as the department's 25th consecutive loss in these voter-file cases. Lowdown's own count of dismissals stood at 17 in July, when the programme was reaching the appeals courts.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee on 15 September. He told Senator Richard Blumenthal that he did not know of a legal bar to agents at polling places, and declined to commit to keeping them away⁠3. For voters in the three named states, November brings federal monitors whose reports can reach a prosecutor through Dhillon's office.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Harmeet Dhillon, who heads the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, said the department would send about 1,000 election monitors to watch polling in Nevada, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. The next day, a judge threw out a separate DOJ lawsuit that had tried to force Washington state to hand over its voter rolls, a loss the state's attorney general, Nick Brown, called the department's 25th in a row on this kind of case. Separately, the FBI's Kash Patel told a senator, Richard Blumenthal, on 15 September that he did not know of any legal rule stopping federal agents from being at polling places.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    DOJ's monitor programme and its voter-roll litigation are legally distinct tracks, so the litigation losing streak Nick Brown cites does not by itself weaken the department's authority to deploy monitors.

First Reported In

Update #18 · Republicans spend first, Democrats hold cash

Connecticut Centinal· 24 Sept 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Department of Justice (DOJ)
DOJ appealed to the 9th Circuit after Judge David O. Carter did not rule by a noon deadline on 22 October that DOJ itself had set, seeking to have California set aside mail ballots from more than 20,000 listed voters. Its case is that ineligible votes cancel lawful ones; the panel dismissed the appeal 2-1 on 26 October.
Lower Costs Now
Lower Costs Now
Lower Costs Now reported $7.37m in Kansas on 24 and 25 October, part of $65.65m in Senate races since its first independent expenditure on 1 October, including $17.21m for Josh Turek in Iowa. Its FEC filings show $50.18m raised by 14 October.
MAGA Inc
MAGA Inc
MAGA Inc, the super PAC aligned with Donald Trump, filed $7.20m against James Talarico on 22 October, taking its Texas spending to $37.65m. Of that, $30.12m is against Talarico and $7.53m is for Ken Paxton, the Republican nominee.
Senate Majority PAC (SMP)
Senate Majority PAC (SMP)
SMP's pre-general report shows it spent $108.70m from 1 to 14 October, including $65.0m to WinSenate and $10.0m to Texas Forever, and ended with $32.72m. Texas Forever has reported $19.40m against Ken Paxton since 1 October.
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
SLF's pre-general report shows $88.42m in cash on 14 October and $18.98m raised in the fortnight, none of it from Elon Musk. It has since reported $12.07m against Sherrod Brown in Ohio, and its $2.7m to Plains PAC preceded that committee's first Kansas buy on 25 October.
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)
The NRSC's pre-general report shows nothing spent with Ashley Hinson in Iowa, or with its nominees in six other states, from 1 to 14 October, after $5.54m with Hinson in September. It took no new loan and ended the fortnight with $25.20m in cash and $20m of debt.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.