Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
27OCT

9th Circuit sends DOJ ballot case back

2 min read
13:20UTC

A 9th Circuit panel ruled 2-1 on Monday 26 October that it lacked jurisdiction over DOJ's bid to make California set aside mail ballots from more than 20,000 listed voters, and returned the case to Judge David O. Carter.

PoliticsAssessed
Key takeaway

The 9th Circuit would not rule on DOJ's California ballots appeal before the district judge does.

A 9th Circuit panel, the federal appeals court for California and eight other western states, ruled 2-1 on Monday 26 October that it lacked jurisdiction over the Department of Justice (DOJ) appeal in its California ballots case⁠1⁠2. DOJ wants California to set aside mail ballots from more than 20,000 listed voters, a demand it renewed last week. The panel sent the case back to district judge David O. Carter, who had not yet ruled.

DOJ appealed because Carter did not rule by a noon deadline on 22 October that DOJ itself had set⁠3. Judge Mark Bennett wrote that he would also have refused on the merits: federal law on voting by non-citizens does not override California's authority to run its elections. The panel's unsigned (per curiam) order called DOJ's emergency, at least in part, "a self-constructed one". Judge Gabriel Sanchez wrote that the order would "usher in electoral chaos"⁠4.

Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented: "California's actions must be preempted", that is, overridden by federal law. DOJ's case is that ineligible votes cancel lawful ones; the panel majority faulted it for suing less than three weeks before polling day⁠5. Carter is due to hear DOJ's motion at 4pm Eastern time on Tuesday 27 October⁠6.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The US Justice Department wants California to set aside the mail ballots of more than 20,000 voters it says may not be citizens. The administration has not said publicly how it built that list. A federal appeals court, the 9th Circuit, said on 26 October that it could not step in yet, because the trial judge had not ruled. It sent the case back to that judge, David O. Carter. Carter holds a hearing on 27 October. Polling day is 3 November, so any order would come in the final week.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The US Constitution's Elections Clause gives states the power to run federal elections, subject to laws Congress passes. DOJ's case rests on reading a federal criminal statute on non-citizen voting as overriding California's own voter rolls.

The timing problem began with DOJ's own deadline. It appealed because Judge Carter did not rule by a noon deadline on 22 October that DOJ itself had set, which is why the panel found it had no order to review.

First Reported In

Update #22 · Senate Democrats borrow $15m, outspend GOP

Democracy Docket· 27 Oct 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
9th Circuit sends DOJ ballot case back
The ruling leaves the fate of more than 20,000 California mail ballots with a district judge one week before polling day.
Different Perspectives
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Department of Justice (DOJ)
DOJ appealed to the 9th Circuit after Judge David O. Carter did not rule by a noon deadline on 22 October that DOJ itself had set, seeking to have California set aside mail ballots from more than 20,000 listed voters. Its case is that ineligible votes cancel lawful ones; the panel dismissed the appeal 2-1 on 26 October.
Lower Costs Now
Lower Costs Now
Lower Costs Now reported $7.37m in Kansas on 24 and 25 October, part of $65.65m in Senate races since its first independent expenditure on 1 October, including $17.21m for Josh Turek in Iowa. Its FEC filings show $50.18m raised by 14 October.
MAGA Inc
MAGA Inc
MAGA Inc, the super PAC aligned with Donald Trump, filed $7.20m against James Talarico on 22 October, taking its Texas spending to $37.65m. Of that, $30.12m is against Talarico and $7.53m is for Ken Paxton, the Republican nominee.
Senate Majority PAC (SMP)
Senate Majority PAC (SMP)
SMP's pre-general report shows it spent $108.70m from 1 to 14 October, including $65.0m to WinSenate and $10.0m to Texas Forever, and ended with $32.72m. Texas Forever has reported $19.40m against Ken Paxton since 1 October.
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
SLF's pre-general report shows $88.42m in cash on 14 October and $18.98m raised in the fortnight, none of it from Elon Musk. It has since reported $12.07m against Sherrod Brown in Ohio, and its $2.7m to Plains PAC preceded that committee's first Kansas buy on 25 October.
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)
The NRSC's pre-general report shows nothing spent with Ashley Hinson in Iowa, or with its nominees in six other states, from 1 to 14 October, after $5.54m with Hinson in September. It took no new loan and ended the fortnight with $25.20m in cash and $20m of debt.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.