24SEP

Moore and Wess win Alabama runoffs

2 min read

11:45UTC

Barry Moore won Alabama's Republican congressional primary runoff on 16 June, defeating Navy SEAL Jared Hudson; attorney Everett Wess took the Democratic runoff with 72%. The contests close one chapter of the post-Callais map fight.

← Back to Republicans spend first, Democrats hold cash Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsDeveloping

Key takeaway

Alabama's redistricting fight has moved from courtrooms to candidates as the runoffs name the autumn field.

Barry Moore won Alabama's Republican congressional primary runoff on 16 June, defeating Navy SEAL Jared Hudson. In the Democratic runoff, attorney Everett Wess took 72% over Dakarai Larriett⁠¹. The 16 June results named a Republican and a Democratic nominee where, a month earlier, Alabama had only litigation.

The contests sit inside the churn that followed Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court ruling that ended the Voting Rights Act requirement to draw majority-minority districts, those drawn so a racial or ethnic minority can elect its preferred candidate. After Callais took effect, the Court vacated the order protecting Alabama's majority-Black district and the state voided four primaries held on 19 May. the Supreme Court then stayed the lower-court injunction a week after it issued, confirming the legal framework under which these June runoffs proceeded.

Callais produced a calendar, the calendar produced these 16 June runoffs, and the runoffs produced nominees. The redrawn districts hold their re-do on 11 August, so the Alabama contest now shifts from which lines are lawful to which candidates the new lines elect.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

In May 2026, the Supreme Court ruled in Louisiana v. Callais that states no longer have to draw congressional districts specifically designed to give Black voters a majority. Alabama had been under court orders to draw such a district. When that legal requirement was removed, Alabama's governor declared that the May 2026 congressional primaries, which were already completed, were legally void because they were held under the old map. So Alabama has been holding replacement elections. On 16 June, Republican Barry Moore won a runoff for one seat, and Democrat Everett Wess won 72% in the Democratic runoff for the same area. But the story does not end there: new primaries are scheduled for 11 August under the redrawn district lines that no longer include the Court-ordered majority-Black district. The same candidates may face a different electorate in August.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

The 16 June Alabama runoffs produced by a two-stage redistricting disruption. Louisiana v. Callais on 29 April 2026 removed the VRA Section 2 mandate for majority-minority districts nationally. Alabama responded specifically: the state Supreme Court vacated the lower-court majority-Black district order on 12 May, clearing the post-Callais map, and Governor Ivey declared the 19 May primaries void under those lines.

Barry Moore's 16 June Republican runoff win is therefore not a normal primary result. Moore won a seat in a district whose boundaries were being redrawn during the campaign; he will need to compete again in an 11 August special primary under the revised lines. The 16 June runoff selected the nominee under the pre-Callais contested map; the 11 August primary will determine who runs under the operative post-Callais map.

Everett Wess's 72% Democratic runoff win reflects the self-selecting nature of Alabama Democratic primaries in a Deep South state: the Democratic base in a minority-heavy district concentrated strongly behind the attorney with the cleaner primary exit.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Barry Moore must compete in a second primary on 11 August under redrawn lines; the double-primary sequence could drain resources and create voter confusion about which result governs the general election nominee.
Precedent
The Alabama void-and-re-run sequence is the first application of post-Callais primary mechanics; how courts and the state elections board treat conflicting results from the June and August primaries will establish the procedural precedent for other Callais-affected states.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: The 1982 redistricting cycle produced multi-state primary re-runs after Voting Rights Act challenges invalidated maps in Alabama, Georgia and Texas. In Alabama specifically, courts voided the 1982 primary results in two congressional districts, ordering special elections under redrawn maps, with the re-dos held in October of that year.

The 2026 Alabama sequence, where four primaries were voided on 19 May and replacement special primaries scheduled for 11 August, mirrors the 1982 mechanics almost exactly. In 1982 the re-do elections attracted turnout 28% below the voided primaries.

Counter-parallel: In 2003, Texas ran a court-ordered mid-decade redistricting cycle that produced new primaries only after a legislative special session; no primary results were voided post-facto. The Alabama 2026 situation is therefore closer to the 1982 precedent (judicial voidance of completed primaries) than to the 2003 Texas precedent (pre-election legislative redraw).

Consensus view: The Brennan Center's redistricting tracker documented that Alabama's post-Callais map redraw eliminated the majority-Black district held by Representative Shomari Figures (D, Mobile), consolidating Black voters into a single district rather than the two-district configuration courts had required.

The 16 June runoffs were held under the pre-Callais contested map; the 11 August re-dos run under the operative post-Callais lines. Moore faces a genuine double-primary situation: he wins in June, then competes again in August potentially in a differently configured electorate.

Counter-view: In practice, primary runoff winners carry name recognition and momentum advantages into re-do primaries held within weeks. Moore's win, backed by a $350,000 Fellowship PAC independent expenditure, gives him the incumbent-of-record position heading into August even if the district lines shift substantially.

Key tension: Whether the 11 August re-do primary under the operative post-Callais map produces a different nominee than the 16 June runoff winner, which would create an unprecedented situation of a candidate winning two primaries for the same seat.

Sources:Ballotpedia

Mentions:Barry Moore →Alabama →Louisiana v. Callais →Supreme Court of the United States →Voting Rights Act →Louisiana →Fellowship PAC →Shomari Figures →Texas →

First Reported In

Update #10 · Wave or grind: the measure splits

Ballotpedia· 21 Jun 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Alabama voids its own primary mid-vote

SCOTUS vacating the Alabama majority-Black district order and Ivey voiding the 19 May primaries directly caused the 16 June runoffs that Barry Moore won.

Occurred 19 May 2026

Read story →

Shadow docket shields Alabama map for 2026

SCOTUS staying the Alabama map injunction seven days after it issued confirmed the legal framework under which the 16 June runoffs proceeded.

Occurred 2 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

Moore and Wess win Alabama runoffs

The redistricting battle in Alabama has moved off the courthouse steps and into the candidates the redrawn lines produce.

Different Perspectives

Missouri and Secretary of State Denny Hoskins

Missouri and Hoskins, held in contempt by the state's own supreme court on 10 September for prematurely reverting to HB 1, filed against a pause of the 8th Circuit's order restoring the same 2025 map.

Richard von Glahn and People Not Politicians

Von Glahn and People Not Politicians filed emergency application 26A388 on 22 September asking Justice Kavanaugh to pause the 8th Circuit's order restoring the 2025 map, days after Missouri mailed overseas ballots under the 2022 lines. A refusal to pause it would leave those ballots carrying the wrong districts.

Harmeet Dhillon, Justice Department

Dhillon said the department will send about 1,000 election monitors to Nevada, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island in November, calling it "the biggest DOJ election observer effort in history" and citing "67 election-related indictments and convictions" against 13 under the Biden administration.

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and co-plaintiffs

The NAACP and eight other groups sued DHS in Washington on 18 September to keep ICE away from polling places, citing federal statutes barring armed officers and troops at elections. The suit follows a released 2025 DHS email listing non-English-language voting jurisdictions beside a Justice Department prosecution checklist.

Cook Political Report

Cook wrote that "the amount of money national Republicans have dedicated to this race is a flashing red light for Democrats" when it moved New Hampshire from Lean Democrat to Toss Up on 15 September, citing the NRSC's $5.18m for Sununu. It is the one state where Republican spending and the rating move the same direction.

Democratic Senate strategists

Strategists note the DSCC held a $37.6m cash lead over the NRSC's $18.7m at the end of August, after coordinating just $1.00m of spending itself. One reading holds the committee is banking that cash for the campaign's final weeks rather than matching Republican spending dollar-for-dollar in August.