24SEP

Moore and Wess win Alabama runoffs

2 min read

11:45UTC

Barry Moore won Alabama's Republican congressional primary runoff on 16 June, defeating Navy SEAL Jared Hudson; attorney Everett Wess took the Democratic runoff with 72%. The contests close one chapter of the post-Callais map fight.

← Back to Republicans spend first, Democrats hold cash Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsDeveloping

Key takeaway

Alabama's redistricting fight has moved from courtrooms to candidates as the runoffs name the autumn field.

Barry Moore won Alabama's Republican congressional primary runoff on 16 June, defeating Navy SEAL Jared Hudson. In the Democratic runoff, attorney Everett Wess took 72% over Dakarai Larriett⁠¹. The 16 June results named a Republican and a Democratic nominee where, a month earlier, Alabama had only litigation.

The contests sit inside the churn that followed Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court ruling that ended the Voting Rights Act requirement to draw majority-minority districts, those drawn so a racial or ethnic minority can elect its preferred candidate. After Callais took effect, the Court vacated the order protecting Alabama's majority-Black district and the state voided four primaries held on 19 May. the Supreme Court then stayed the lower-court injunction a week after it issued, confirming the legal framework under which these June runoffs proceeded.

Callais produced a calendar, the calendar produced these 16 June runoffs, and the runoffs produced nominees. The redrawn districts hold their re-do on 11 August, so the Alabama contest now shifts from which lines are lawful to which candidates the new lines elect.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

In May 2026, the Supreme Court ruled in Louisiana v. Callais that states no longer have to draw congressional districts specifically designed to give Black voters a majority. Alabama had been under court orders to draw such a district. When that legal requirement was removed, Alabama's governor declared that the May 2026 congressional primaries, which were already completed, were legally void because they were held under the old map. So Alabama has been holding replacement elections. On 16 June, Republican Barry Moore won a runoff for one seat, and Democrat Everett Wess won 72% in the Democratic runoff for the same area. But the story does not end there: new primaries are scheduled for 11 August under the redrawn district lines that no longer include the Court-ordered majority-Black district. The same candidates may face a different electorate in August.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

The 16 June Alabama runoffs produced by a two-stage redistricting disruption. Louisiana v. Callais on 29 April 2026 removed the VRA Section 2 mandate for majority-minority districts nationally. Alabama responded specifically: the US Supreme Court vacated the lower-court majority-Black district order on 11 May, clearing the post-Callais map, and Governor Ivey declared the 19 May primaries void under those lines.

Barry Moore's 16 June Republican runoff win is therefore not a normal primary result. Moore won a seat in a district whose boundaries were being redrawn during the campaign; he will need to compete again in an 11 August special primary under the revised lines. The 16 June runoff selected the nominee under the pre-Callais contested map; the 11 August primary will determine who runs under the operative post-Callais map.

Everett Wess's 72% Democratic runoff win reflects the self-selecting nature of Alabama Democratic primaries in a Deep South state: the Democratic base in a minority-heavy district concentrated strongly behind the attorney with the cleaner primary exit.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Barry Moore must compete in a second primary on 11 August under redrawn lines; the double-primary sequence could drain resources and create voter confusion about which result governs the general election nominee.
Precedent
The Alabama void-and-re-run sequence is the first application of post-Callais primary mechanics; how courts and the state elections board treat conflicting results from the June and August primaries will establish the procedural precedent for other Callais-affected states.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: The 1982 redistricting cycle produced multi-state primary re-runs after Voting Rights Act challenges invalidated maps in Alabama, Georgia and Texas. In Alabama specifically, courts voided the 1982 primary results in two congressional districts, ordering special elections under redrawn maps, with the re-dos held in October of that year.

The 2026 Alabama sequence, where four primaries were voided on 19 May and replacement special primaries scheduled for 11 August, mirrors the 1982 mechanics almost exactly. In 1982 the re-do elections attracted turnout 28% below the voided primaries.

Counter-parallel: In 2003, Texas ran a court-ordered mid-decade redistricting cycle that produced new primaries only after a legislative special session; no primary results were voided post-facto. The Alabama 2026 situation is therefore closer to the 1982 precedent (judicial voidance of completed primaries) than to the 2003 Texas precedent (pre-election legislative redraw).

Consensus view: The Brennan Center's redistricting tracker documented that Alabama's post-Callais map redraw eliminated the majority-Black district held by Representative Shomari Figures (D, Mobile), consolidating Black voters into a single district rather than the two-district configuration courts had required.

The 16 June runoffs were held under the pre-Callais contested map; the 11 August re-dos run under the operative post-Callais lines. Moore faces a genuine double-primary situation: he wins in June, then competes again in August potentially in a differently configured electorate.

Counter-view: In practice, primary runoff winners carry name recognition and momentum advantages into re-do primaries held within weeks. Moore's win, backed by a $350,000 Fellowship PAC independent expenditure, gives him the incumbent-of-record position heading into August even if the district lines shift substantially.

Key tension: Whether the 11 August re-do primary under the operative post-Callais map produces a different nominee than the 16 June runoff winner, which would create an unprecedented situation of a candidate winning two primaries for the same seat.

Sources:Ballotpedia

Mentions:Barry Moore →Alabama →Louisiana v. Callais →Supreme Court of the United States →Voting Rights Act →Louisiana →Fellowship PAC →Shomari Figures →Texas →

First Reported In

Update #10 · Wave or grind: the measure splits

Ballotpedia· 21 Jun 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Alabama voids its own primary mid-vote

SCOTUS vacating the Alabama majority-Black district order and Ivey voiding the 19 May primaries directly caused the 16 June runoffs that Barry Moore won.

Occurred 19 May 2026

Read story →

Shadow docket shields Alabama map for 2026

SCOTUS staying the Alabama map injunction seven days after it issued confirmed the legal framework under which the 16 June runoffs proceeded.

Occurred 2 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

Moore and Wess win Alabama runoffs

The redistricting battle in Alabama has moved off the courthouse steps and into the candidates the redrawn lines produce.

Different Perspectives

University of Florida Election Lab

The lab, run by Michael McDonald, estimates about 124.3 million ballots, a raw midterm record, and turnout of about 49.4% of eligible voters, second to 2018's 50.05%. The raw record reflects population growth more than a record rate, so the late count is working through a near-2018 electorate.

Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson

Ron Johnson backed the failed 31-15 motion to delay Thune's re-election, after activists such as Mike Cernovich blamed the leader for the defeat. Their complaint is that Republicans could have passed the SAVE Act; in January it meets a Democratic Senate instead.

Senator John Thune

Thune was re-elected Senate Republican leader by acclamation on 10 November after a motion to delay failed 31-15. He kept the filibuster that stopped the SAVE Act, the choice his critics on the right blame for the defeat.

House Republicans under Jim Jordan

House Republicans elected Jordan minority leader by 106 votes to 73 over Steve Scalise on 10 November, after Speaker Mike Johnson declined to run. They replaced the leadership that lost the majority, while Senate Republicans kept theirs.

Donald Trump

Trump asked on Truth Social on 9 November whether anybody believed the election "was honest" and blamed the machines, having told The New York Times on polling night he would accept the results. No Republican campaign had sued over a 2026 result by 10 November, so the claim has no case behind it.

Judge David O. Carter

Carter closed the Justice Department's suit over about 20,000 California mail ballots on 10 November after the department withdrew it, writing that the suit "attempted to disrupt an ongoing election". The closure leaves the department with no court order touching a 2026 California ballot.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.