Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
US Midterms 2026
7MAY

Fellowship PAC drops $3M on GOP races

3 min read
15:03UTC

Fellowship PAC has disclosed more than three million dollars in independent expenditures since 31 March, led by $1.75M for Ken Paxton in the Texas Senate Republican runoff against John Cornyn on Tuesday 26 May.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

Fellowship PAC's $3M IE drop turned a crypto-versus-NRSC primary fight into a live event before May FEC filings.

Fellowship PAC, the cryptocurrency-aligned committee whose Q1 FEC filing disclosed $11M in receipts , has now disclosed more than $3 million in independent expenditures (IE), spending by political action committees that cannot legally be coordinated with a candidate's campaign. 1 The largest line is $1.75M supporting Ken Paxton against incumbent John Cornyn in the Texas Senate Republican primary runoff on Tuesday 26 May. Smaller buys followed: $350,000 each on Mike Collins in Georgia, Barry Moore in Alabama, and Julia Letlow in Louisiana, plus $250,000 on Blake Miguez in Louisiana.

The Paxton spending puts a crypto PAC linked to Tether, the world's largest dollar-pegged stablecoin issuer, into open primary combat with the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC). NRSC is backing Cornyn; Trump adviser Chris LaCivita is working for a pro-Cornyn super PAC; Donald Trump has refused to endorse either side. Paxton leads 48-45 in runoff polling. 2

The same $1.75M figure first surfaced as the Paxton ghost-ad that drew Republican leadership inquiries directed at Howard Lutnick ; the money that alarmed the party leadership in April is now openly deployed against the party's preferred candidate. Fellowship's headline $100M war chest remains $89M short of its FEC paper trail; the next monthly filing on or about Wednesday 20 May is the next data point. Senator Steve Daines's withdrawal from the Montana primary sits as a counter-example of Republican incumbency surrendering without a fight; Cornyn is fighting his.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

A super PAC (political action committee) can spend unlimited amounts of money to support or oppose candidates, as long as it does not coordinate directly with a campaign. Fellowship PAC is one such committee, and it has ties to the cryptocurrency industry, specifically to Tether, which issues the world's most widely used digital dollar. Fellowship PAC has spent more than $3 million backing Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general, in his challenge to John Cornyn, the sitting US senator from Texas. The Republican Party establishment, through its Senate campaign arm, is backing Cornyn. The significance is that a crypto-linked committee is now in open conflict with the Republican Party's own Senate fundraising organisation in a primary race that will decide the Republican Senate candidate for one of the country's largest states.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The FEC filing gap between Fellowship PAC's claimed $100M and its documented $11M has a structural explanation. Independent expenditures do not require pre-disclosure; the $3M in IEs appeared in post-period disclosures filed after the Q1 cutoff. The $89M gap may reflect contributions received in April that will appear in the monthly May filing due around 20 May, or it may reflect the original claim being false.

The Tether connection explains the donor composition: Cantor Fitzgerald custodies Tether's dollar reserves and its chief executive Howard Lutnick has been publicly associated with Trump's inner circle. The PAC's financial architecture runs through relationships that are not visible in standard campaign finance filings.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If Paxton wins the 26 May runoff, the NRSC faces a weaker general-election candidate in Texas; Democratic nominee Colin Allred, who nearly beat Ted Cruz in 2024, could make Texas competitive.

    Short term · 0.65
  • Consequence

    The FEC's May monthly filing for Fellowship PAC, due around 20 May, will either validate the $100M claim or confirm the $89M gap is a false representation, the most significant disclosure question before the 26 May runoff.

    Immediate · 0.85
  • Precedent

    Crypto-aligned PACs deploying eight-figure sums in Republican primaries establishes a new donor faction inside the party that does not answer to the NRSC or traditional Republican donor networks.

    Long term · 0.75
First Reported In

Update #5 · Callais lands; maps move

CoinTelegraph· 7 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Labour-market economists
Labour-market economists
Economists note June payrolls rose just 57,000, about half the forecast 115,000, with April and May revised down further. They call it the only development this week bearing directly on how incumbents can run on the economy in November.
Alaska political observers
Alaska political observers
The state Supreme Court's reinstatement of Dan J. Sullivan of Petersburg to the 18 August primary ballot means two men named Dan Sullivan, one the sitting senator, may both appear. Observers moved the race to Toss-up on the ballot mechanics alone, not any shift in the campaign.
OpenSecrets campaign-finance analysts
OpenSecrets campaign-finance analysts
Analysts flag that all four national committees, the NRSC included, can now form joint fundraising committees combining donor money with full coordination. They expect the DSCC, NRCC and DCCC to match the move before the effect shows up in filings.
NRSC strategists
NRSC strategists
The NRSC told campaigns on 30 June to fold independent spending into fully coordinated vehicles now that the Supreme Court has struck the caps. Strategists see it as converting the RNC's roughly $110m cash edge into leverage precisely where challengers are outspending Republican incumbents.
Democracy Docket / voting-rights litigators
Democracy Docket / voting-rights litigators
Litigators note DOJ is now 0-for-6 on trial losses yet still climbing the appellate ladder through the Sixth Circuit en banc bid. They read the persistence itself as the point: keep the underlying dispute alive past November regardless of the win rate.
Fulton County election officials
Fulton County election officials
Fulton County had argued in court that the subpoena was meant to "target, harass and punish" perceived opponents, and the 7 July ruling ended that specific demand. Officials treat the outcome as proof the criminal track was pressure, not a genuine prosecution.