24SEP

MAHA topples two Republican governor hopefuls

2 min read

11:45UTC

Make America Healthy Again challengers beat establishment Republicans in the Iowa and South Dakota governor primaries around Tuesday 2 June, downing three-term congressman Randy Feenstra and Dusty Johnson.

← Back to Republicans spend first, Democrats hold cash Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsDeveloping

Key takeaway

MAHA challengers beat two establishment Republicans in governor primaries, widening the party's factional split.

Make America Healthy Again (MAHA), the populist health-focused movement associated with Robert F. Kennedy Jr, defeated establishment Republicans in two gubernatorial primaries around Tuesday 2 June⁠¹. In Iowa, Zach Lahn beat Randy Feenstra, a three-term congressman connected to the NRCC, the House Republicans' campaign committee. In South Dakota, congressman Dusty Johnson lost his bid for governor.

Both losers were mainstream conservatives with congressional records and party infrastructure behind them, the profile that usually wins a primary on name recognition and money. Their defeat by insurgent challengers shows MAHA can turn out a primary electorate against the establishment in governor's races, extending its reach beyond the Senate contests where the faction first drew notice.

The pattern extends a factional fracture already visible in the Texas Senate runoff, where Ken Paxton ousted NRSC-preferred John Cornyn by 28 points despite a nine-to-one spending disadvantage. Texas was a Senate seat; Iowa and South Dakota are governorships, which broadens the fracture from one chamber to executive primaries. Establishment Republicans are now losing on multiple fronts to challengers their own committees cannot reliably stop.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) is a political movement associated with Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who served in Donald Trump's administration and focused on issues like food safety, pharmaceutical regulation, and opposition to what MAHA supporters call corporate influence over public health policy. In 2026, MAHA has been backing challengers in Republican primary elections against more traditional Republican candidates. On around 2 June 2026, two MAHA-aligned or movement-adjacent challengers won Republican governor primaries. In Iowa, Zach Lahn defeated Randy Feenstra, a congressman who had served three terms in Washington and was connected to the Republican Party's congressional committee. In South Dakota, Dusty Johnson, another congressman, lost his primary. Both Feenstra and Johnson lost partly because their Washington connections were used against them: MAHA voters in these states are suspicious of candidates associated with the traditional Republican Party establishment. The wins follow a similar pattern to Ken Paxton's defeat of John Cornyn in Texas, showing that this faction can win in multiple types of races.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

MAHA's primary success in Iowa and South Dakota reflects two structural conditions specific to Republican gubernatorial primaries in 2026. First, incumbent congressmen running for governor face a built-in credibility problem: they are running from a Washington context at a moment when Republican primary voters rate Congress's performance lower than at any point since 2011.

Feenstra's three-term record in Washington became a liability in a primary dominated by voters whose MAHA alignment is partly an anti-Washington cultural statement.

Second, Republican governor primaries in safe-Republican states draw a disproportionate share of the most ideologically activated primary electorate, which in 2026 includes a significant MAHA-aligned cohort energised by Robert F.

Kennedy Jr's Health and Human Services influence in the Trump administration. Where that cohort is large enough relative to total primary turnout, a well-resourced challenger running on food and pharmaceutical reform messaging can reach the winning threshold without converting persuadable centrists.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Two MAHA-aligned governors in Iowa and South Dakota give the movement executive branch platforms to test food-additive and pharmaceutical-regulation policies without federal legislative approval, creating state-level policy laboratories.
Risk
NRCC-connected incumbents in safe-Republican House districts now face a primary threat from MAHA challengers emboldened by the Iowa and South Dakota governor results, particularly those who publicly opposed Kennedy Jr's HHS agenda.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Consensus view: Niskanen Center analysts tracking intra-Republican factional conflict document that MAHA challengers share a three-part primary mobilisation toolkit: RFK Jr-era health-politics messaging on food additives and pharmaceutical regulation, anti-institutional framing that positions NRCC or NRSC backing as a disqualifier rather than an asset, and a small-dollar fundraising base that signals grassroots rather than donor-class support.

Feenstra's NRCC connection was weaponised by Lahn's campaign precisely because it identified Feenstra with the Washington institutional machinery MAHA voters distrust.

Counter-view: American Enterprise Institute's Daniel Lyons argues that reading Iowa and South Dakota as evidence of durable MAHA factional power overstates the signal. Both are historically low-turnout Republican primaries where name recognition and protest voting consistently inflate the apparent strength of challenger movements.

The 2010 Tea Party wave similarly produced Iowa and South Dakota upsets in low-salience primaries; most Tea Party-aligned governors served conventionally once in office, and many of those insurgent patterns proved non-reproducible in general elections.

Key tension: Whether MAHA-aligned gubernatorial nominees in safely Republican states change state policy in ways that affect 2028 Republican presidential primary dynamics, or whether governor-level MAHA is primarily a factional signalling mechanism with limited downstream policy consequence.

Sources:Roll Call

Mentions:Make America Healthy Again →Randy Feenstra →Iowa →South Dakota →NRCC →American Enterprise Institute →Ken Paxton →Texas Senate runoff →John Cornyn →Republican Party →Donald Trump →Washington →Texas →Trump administration →

First Reported In

Update #8 · Shadow docket shields maps

Roll Call· 6 Jun 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

This Event

MAHA topples two Republican governor hopefuls

The MAHA faction can mobilise primary electorates against mainstream Republicans beyond Senate races.

Led to

An Iran War price shock hits Iowa

The MAHA primary victories over Feenstra and other NRSC-linked incumbents form the factional backdrop against which Cook moved Iowa Senate toward Democrats.

Occurred 3 Jun 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

University of Florida Election Lab

The lab, run by Michael McDonald, estimates about 124.3 million ballots, a raw midterm record, and turnout of about 49.4% of eligible voters, second to 2018's 50.05%. The raw record reflects population growth more than a record rate, so the late count is working through a near-2018 electorate.

Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson

Ron Johnson backed the failed 31-15 motion to delay Thune's re-election, after activists such as Mike Cernovich blamed the leader for the defeat. Their complaint is that Republicans could have passed the SAVE Act; in January it meets a Democratic Senate instead.

Senator John Thune

Thune was re-elected Senate Republican leader by acclamation on 10 November after a motion to delay failed 31-15. He kept the filibuster that stopped the SAVE Act, the choice his critics on the right blame for the defeat.

House Republicans under Jim Jordan

House Republicans elected Jordan minority leader by 106 votes to 73 over Steve Scalise on 10 November, after Speaker Mike Johnson declined to run. They replaced the leadership that lost the majority, while Senate Republicans kept theirs.

Donald Trump

Trump asked on Truth Social on 9 November whether anybody believed the election "was honest" and blamed the machines, having told The New York Times on polling night he would accept the results. No Republican campaign had sued over a 2026 result by 10 November, so the claim has no case behind it.

Judge David O. Carter

Carter closed the Justice Department's suit over about 20,000 California mail ballots on 10 November after the department withdrew it, writing that the suit "attempted to disrupt an ongoing election". The closure leaves the department with no court order touching a 2026 California ballot.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.