15SEP

Stephen Richer briefs the citizenship-proof issue

2 min read

14:21UTC

Stephen Richer, the Republican former Maricopa County recorder, submitted a Supreme Court brief on 20 October supporting the voting groups on documentary proof of citizenship at registration. He takes no position on the separate 90-day voter-removal question.

← Back to Missouri's election chief held in contempt Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsAssessed

Key takeaway

Richer supports the voting groups on registration proof but takes no position on the separate voter-removal question.

Stephen Richer, the Republican former recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, submitted a brief on 20 October supporting the voting groups on documentary proof of citizenship at registration in RNC v. Mi Familia Vota⁠¹⁠². His brief takes no position on the separate 90-day voter-removal question. The US government backed the Republican National Committee (RNC) in the same case earlier this month. Richer asks the Court to leave the registration-proof issue for further consideration in the lower courts.

The Democratic National Committee (DNC), a respondent, also asked the Court on 20 October for a share of argument time, matching the government's request on the other side⁠³. The docket shows no ruling on argument time yet.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

the Supreme Court case asks two separate questions. One concerns documentary proof of citizenship at registration. The other concerns removing voters within 90 days of a federal election. Stephen Richer supports the voting groups on the registration-proof question. He takes no position on the 90-day voter-removal question. The Democratic Party wants to argue in court too.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Richer lost the Republican primary for Maricopa County recorder in July 2024 to Justin Heap, after defending the county's 2020 and 2022 counts against claims of fraud. He now writes from outside office and supports the voting groups on the registration-proof issue.

The case matters this autumn because the quiet period is the main legal bar on last-minute removals, and DOJ's other route, demanding removals through SAVE checks, was ruled unlawful on 9 October.

What could happen next?

Consequence
The court's decision on argument time will show whether the DNC joins the hearing alongside the voting groups.
Precedent
A ruling that the quiet period excludes non-citizen removals would let states act on federal lists right up to future elections.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: In 2014, in Arcia v. Florida Secretary of State, the 11th Circuit held that Florida's 2012 programme to remove suspected non-citizens inside the 90-day window breached the Act. That ruling treated non-citizen removals as covered by the quiet period.

Counter-parallel: On 30 October 2024, the Supreme Court let Virginia keep removing suspected non-citizens inside the quiet period, in Beals v. Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights. It gave no reasons, so the question reached the Court again in this case.

Consensus view: The National Voter Registration Act bars any 'systematic' programme to remove voters in the 90 days before a federal election.

The question the Supreme Court left open in footnote 2 of its 25 September SAVE order is whether removing suspected non-citizens counts, since they were never eligible. The United States now argues for the Republicans.

Counter-view: Richer supports the voting groups on documentary proof of citizenship at registration but takes no position on the separate 90-day voter-removal question. He asks the Court to leave the registration-proof issue for further consideration in the lower courts.

Key tension: Whether the Court treats the quiet period as a guard against error, which bites hardest on lists like the DHS ones that have shrunk under checking, or as a rule about eligible voters that never protected non-citizens.

Sources:Supreme Court of the United States·Supreme Court of the United States

Mentions:Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota →Democratic National Committee →Supreme Court of the United States →Maricopa County →Republican National Committee →Mi Familia Vota →Beals v. Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights →Arcia v. Florida Secretary of State →Democratic Party →Virginia →United States →Florida →Arizona →National Voter Registration Act →Stephen Richer →SAVE System →Eleventh Circuit →

First Reported In

Update #21 · Senate GOP's cash lead trails its $20m loan

Supreme Court of the United States· 22 Oct 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

US backs RNC in Mi Familia Vota case

The DNC's argument-time request matches the government's 16 October motion on the other side.

Occurred 16 Oct 2026

Read story →

This Event

Stephen Richer briefs the citizenship-proof issue

Richer asks the court to leave the registration-proof issue for further consideration in the lower courts.

Different Perspectives

Missouri voters

Missouri voters rejected Proposition A by 61.83% to 38.17% at 95% reporting, repealing the 2025 map that split Kansas City. Trump carried the state, yet its 2022 lines now stay for future elections too.

Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)

SLF reported about $43.9m of independent expenditures from 27 October to 1 November, almost all against Democrats, including $12.37m against Sherrod Brown. Seven of its ten targets won; Dan Osborn lost in Nebraska and two are uncalled.

Richard Hudson, chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee

Hudson, who runs House Republicans' campaign arm, conceded North Carolina's 9th District to Richard Ojeda before any AP call. Democrats lead 10 of the state's 14 House districts on the unofficial feed.

Department of Justice (DOJ)

DOJ lost before Judge David O. Carter on 28 October and a 9th Circuit panel on 30 October on its demand to set aside 20,000 California ballots, and says it will appeal the Alaska dismissal. No court has set a ballot aside.

Senator Dan S. Sullivan

Sullivan, who trails Mary Peltola 48.2% to 47.9% on first choices, told CNN he would accept the result. DOJ's suit to stop Alaska certifying anyone but him was dismissed on 1 November.

Scott Colom's campaign

Colom's campaign estimates that about 15,000 affidavit ballots remain to be counted in a race he leads by roughly 65 to 100 votes. Those ballots count only if voters confirm their ID or eligibility by 5pm on 10 November.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.