
Mi Familia Vota
US Latino civic-engagement group focused on voter registration and turnout.
Mi Familia Vota is the lead respondent in Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota, which the Supreme Court will hear on 8 December 2026; on 25 September the justices left the NVRA's 90-day roll-cleaning question to that case.
Last refreshed: 1 October 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
Can Arizona refuse to register voters who lack proof of citizenship?
Timeline for Mi Familia Vota
Mentioned in: Supreme Court revives DHS's SAVE checks
US Midterms 2026Background
Mi Familia Vota is a US Latino civic-engagement organisation that runs voter registration, education and turnout work among Latino communities.
It is best known in the courts for its challenge to Arizona's proof-of-citizenship voting rules, which became Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota at the Supreme Court. The Republican National Committee petitioned for review, and the Court granted it on 29 June 2026, with argument set for 8 December. The case turns on the National Voter Registration Act, including its 90-day limit on systematic removals before a federal election.
The group's significance lies in that litigation. the Supreme Court's ruling will set national rules on how states verify citizenship and when they may remove registrants, which touches every voter-roll programme in the country, including the federal SAVE checks restored in September 2026.
The group's case decides the removal window
When the Supreme Court let the Department of Homeland Security restore its bulk SAVE citizenship checks on 25 September 2026, it did not settle how election offices may use the results before polling day. The National Voter Registration Act bars systematic roll cleaning in the last 90 days before a federal election, so until 3 November states can check voters only one by one.
That question now rests in Mi Familia Vota's case. the Court granted review on 29 June, respondents' briefs fall due on 13 October and argument is set for 8 December. For the group, the stakes reach beyond one election: a ruling on the quiet period will govern how close to future votes states can strike names from the rolls.