24JUL

YouGov puts the Greens at 15%, down from 17%

3 min read

12:51UTC

YouGov's 31 May to 1 June poll put the Greens at 15%, down from a 17% pre-election peak, as Hackney, Lewisham and Cardiff turned protest into responsibility.

← Back to England's council map redrawn as five sue Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsDeveloping

Key takeaway

The Green surge softens to 15% as Hackney, Lewisham and Cardiff turn a protest vote into a governing record.

YouGov's Westminster poll on Sunday 31 May and Monday 1 June put the Greens at 15%, down from their pre-election peak of 17% when they briefly led Labour⁠¹. Over the same poll, Reform rose three points to 27%, and Conservatives and Labour sat tied at 18%, the first time the two have been level since before the 2024 general election.

Read structurally rather than as a scoreboard, the Green number tracks a transition. The surge that peaked while the party was still in opposition has softened now that the Greens actually run Hackney and Lewisham and prop up the Plaid Cymru minority government in Cardiff. A protest vote is cheap; governing is not, and the deflation coincides with the arrival of real responsibility. The Liberal Democrats after 2010 and UKIP after their local breakthroughs followed the same compression once they owned decisions rather than only opposing them. Labour appears to be reclaiming Green-curious voters as the anti-Reform tactical choice in Westminster terms.

Reform's move cuts the other way and exposes its own split between vote and organisation. Its national share is climbing even as it sheds councillors, with departures since polling day now in the high twenties. Winning the argument with voters and keeping the people who won the seats are turning out to be different problems.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

YouGov is a polling firm that regularly asks people in Britain how they would vote in a general election. Before the May elections, the Green Party hit 17% in these polls, its highest ever, briefly leading Labour. That was remarkable because The Greens had usually polled in the low single figures nationally. After the May elections, The Greens actually won control of two London councils, Hackney and Lewisham, and agreed to back a minority government in Wales. Now a new YouGov poll puts them at 15%, down two points. Political scientists say this is common: parties that were popular partly because they were not in charge often slip once they start making real decisions with real consequences.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

The Green Party's polling surge in late 2025 and early 2026 was partly a genuine realignment of environmentally motivated voters who left Labour over its retreat from its 2024 green investment pledge. But a significant secondary component came from voters using The Greens as a safe protest vehicle against a Labour government perceived as ineffective without wanting to validate Reform.

Once The Greens took control of Hackney and Lewisham and committed to confidence-and-supply for Plaid Cymru in Cardiff, both components faced a stress test. Protest voters can no longer use The Greens as a vehicle for dissatisfaction without also endorsing the party's governance choices. In Hackney and Lewisham specifically, The Greens now own local housing, planning, and licensing decisions, each of which involves trade-offs that protest votes never had to price.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Labour's recovery to 18% suggests protest-Green voters are drifting back as Labour becomes the default anti-Reform vehicle at Westminster level, even as the Greens hold their local power bases.
Short term · Assessed
Risk
If Greens fall below 13% nationally, their by-election and Westminster target-seat calculations become significantly harder, compressing the party's path to a larger Commons presence.
Medium term · Assessed
Opportunity
Council control in Hackney and Lewisham gives the Greens an evidence base to demonstrate governing competence before the next general election, potentially converting soft protest support into harder identification if delivery is visible.
Medium term · Assessed

Source Landscape

Primary parallel: The German Greens (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) entered the Ampelkoalition government in December 2021 on 14.8% of the federal vote, a modern high, after running as an oppositional climate-emergency party under Annalena Baerbock.

By March 2022, INSA polls had them at 11%; by mid-2023 they had fallen to 13-14% and stabilised. The mechanism was identical to what the YouGov tracker shows for the English Greens: a protest-vote component left once governing meant compromise and coalition management rather than principled opposition.

Counter-parallel: The Scottish Greens (SGP) held their support relatively well after entering a formal power-sharing agreement with the SNP from 2021 to 2023, maintaining around 7-9% in Holyrood polling. The difference was that SGP support was more ideologically rooted and its governing role was explicit from the start; the English Greens' 2026 support was partly built on protest voters from Labour who had weaker Green identification.

Consensus view: John Curtice (Strathclyde) and Rob Ford (Manchester) have both documented the pattern they call the incumbency deflation effect: parties that acquire governing responsibility at any tier of government typically see their national Westminster polling soften within four to eight weeks, because their voter coalition contains a large protest component that supported them specifically because they were not in government.

Paula Surridge (Bristol) and the UK in a Changing Europe's tracker have noted that The Greens' 2026 surge drew disproportionately from 2024 Labour voters who wanted to signal discontent with Starmer without crossing to Reform; once The Greens are running councils and propping up a Welsh government, that signal becomes harder to send cleanly.

Counter-view: More in Common's focus-group research from May 2026 suggests the deflation is smaller than the raw polling movement implies, because Green activists are substantially more engaged than in previous cycles and are using Hackney and Lewisham as organising bases.

Green strategists point to the German Greens' experience after entering the Ampelkoalition in 2021: national polling fell sharply in year one but stabilised once governing competence became visible. The counter-argument is that The Greens' 2% drop in two weeks is too steep to be explained by governing-competence normalisation alone, and reflects genuine tactical switching back to Labour as the anti-Reform vehicle.

Key tension: Whether the Green coalition is durably remade as a governing-left force or whether it retains a large protest-vote substrate that will deflate every time The Greens exercise real power.

Sources:YouGov

Mentions:YouGov →Green Party →Reform UK →Labour Party →Conservative Party →Hackney →Lewisham →Plaid Cymru →Wales →More in Common →Holyrood →Westminster →UKIP →London →Liberal Democrats →Scottish Greens →John Curtice →

First Reported In

Update #10 · Reform's audit unit hits the spend wall

YouGov· 3 Jun 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Reform plateau breaks after five weeks

The Greens' rise to 15% extends the recovery first measured after their post-election dip from 17%.

Occurred 13 Jul 2026

Read story →

This Event

YouGov puts the Greens at 15%, down from 17%

The Green number tracks the moment a protest vote acquires a governing record, the structural shift that compresses insurgent shares.

Led to

Greens overtake Labour in YouGov national VI

The Greens' 17% pre-election peak (ID:2804) is the baseline against which the 31 May-1 June 15% is measured as a two-point deflation

Occurred 22 Apr 2026

Read story →

Greens take Hackney and Lewisham boroughs

Greens taking control of Hackney and Lewisham (ID:3152) replaced protest-vote status with governing responsibility, the structural shift the polling deflation tracks

Occurred 7 May 2026

Read story →

Reform loses 22 councillors in 14 days

Reform losing 22 councillors (ID:3545) while its national share climbs to 27% illustrates the vote-vs-organisation split surfaced by this poll

Occurred 21 May 2026

Read story →

Reform holds 25% through the storm

The 5-6 July YouGov reading extends the same tracking poll series.

Occurred 6 Jul 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

Scottish National Party / John Swinney

Swinney told the SNP conference in Aberdeen on 17 October that Scotland is ready for independence, but set no referendum date, bill or Section 30 request. He launched a new campaign instead and extended the £2 bus fare cap to the north east from April 2027.

Liberal Democrats / Ed Davey

Davey ruled out a national partnership with the Greens on 19 October after their Brighton conference passed a "Zionism is racism" motion, and wrote to two Jewish community bodies. He left untouched the councils the two parties already run together.

Reform UK / Richard Tice

Tice alleged ITV's reporter used false details to get a press-office job and said ITV had "likely broken the law", telling members not to speak to it until it apologises. Reform also opened investigations into members, with some suspensions, so the party is contesting the broadcaster and disciplining councillors at once.

Rhun ap Iorwerth / Welsh Government (Plaid Cymru)

Ap Iorwerth presented six priorities to the Senedd on 22 September without numeric targets or a named partner party, promising to work across the chamber where there is common ground. He says his government will be judged on results.

Michael Marra / Scottish Labour

Marra won the leadership on 19 September, and three days later his 17 MSPs backed Swinney's right-to-decide motion once their child-poverty amendment was written in. He says Scottish Labour's task is to tell voters what it stands for.

Andy Burnham / Labour Party

Burnham told conference in Liverpool on 29 September that Labour's next manifesto will commit to changing the electoral system, and invited every party into a National Commission on Electoral Reform. He has not named a replacement system, and no chair or remit has been published.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.