Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
UK Local Elections 2026
22MAY

Reform loses 22 councillors in 14 days

3 min read
10:09UTC

Reform UK shed 22 councillors in the fortnight after 7 May (five lost seats, eight resignations, four defections, five suspensions), at an annualised rate of roughly 27%, against the 4-6% baseline NatCen records for newly elected parties.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

The departure rate runs roughly five times the NatCen baseline for newly elected parties, with active defections driving the figure.

Reform UK lost 22 councillors in the 14 days after polling against an elected base of 2,126 , per political scientist Mark Pack's detailed tally. The breakdown runs five lost seats, eight resignations, four defections, five suspensions. At 1.57 departures per day the annualised rate sits at roughly 573, or 27% of the elected base, against Reform's own projected 10% that would have implied 200 over a year.

The NatCen Local Election Cohort Study baseline for any newly elected party runs 4-6% in the first year. Reform's 14-day rate annualised is roughly five times that figure. Defections, the rarest of the four categories, are the qualitative signal: movement to Restore Britain and to independents indicates ideological rejection rather than personal exit. Suspensions are the second analytical signal because suspended councillors continue to count in the headline seat total but cannot vote on cabinet or committee decisions. The party's effective working numbers on affected councils have therefore dropped further than the public count shows.

This matters for the live LGR judicial reviews running in Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk. Committee balances on the three challenger councils are shifting before the Administrative Court has heard a substantive application. If the rate holds to 22 a fortnight, roughly 40 to 50 will have departed by the end of June, against a party simultaneously running three judicial reviews and a Standards Commissioner investigation into its leader. Defections are also the category most likely to compound: each public departure produces evidence other waverers cite as justification.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Reform UK won over 2,000 council seats on 7 May 2026, making it one of the biggest council forces in England. But since then, the party has been losing councillors quickly. In just two weeks, 22 have gone: some lost their seats in recounts, some resigned, some were suspended by the party for misconduct, and four switched to other parties entirely. This rate of loss is much higher than normal. Research organisation NatCen found that newly elected parties typically lose around 4-6% of their councillors in their first year. Reform is currently on track to lose about 27% in a year, which is five times the normal rate. This matters because Reform controls several councils, including Essex, and is fighting court battles to block government restructuring plans. If Reform keeps losing councillors, its majorities on those councils could disappear before the court cases are resolved.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The structural cause runs through Reform's candidate recruitment mechanism. The party's 2026 candidate slate was assembled from its activist and donor networks rather than through local Conservative or UKIP infrastructure that might have filtered for prior governance experience.

HuffPost UK and HOPE not hate's pre-election reporting documented Reform's vetting as minimal: cold-call recruitment of sitting councillors from rival parties five days before the nomination deadline. Candidates recruited under those conditions have no loyalty to the party organisation and no pre-existing integration into council governance culture.

The suspension category reveals a second structural problem. Suspensions follow disciplinary processes within the party, not the council. A councillor who holds a council seat but is suspended from the party group cannot participate in group decisions, attends council as an independent, and reduces the group's effective voting bloc on committee decisions.

Reform suspended five councillors within 14 days of polling, meaning the party's disciplinary machinery moved faster than its governance onboarding. The suspensions preceded any vote on substantive council policy, suggesting the triggers were pre-election conduct discovered post-election rather than post-election governance failures.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If defections to Restore Britain continue at the current rate, Reform may lose working majorities on one or more of its 14 new councils before the LGR pre-action deadlines resolve, complicating the legal challenge's political mandate.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Each publicly named defection produces evidence other wavering councillors can cite, creating a compounding dynamic where attrition generates further attrition at an accelerating rate through the summer recess.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Opportunity

    Labour and Liberal Democrat council groups in No Overall Control councils have gained minority negotiating leverage at 61 councils as Reform majorities thin, opening dealmaking opportunities on committees and planning decisions.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #9 · Three constitutional contests open

Mark Pack· 22 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
UK Government (Labour)
UK Government (Labour)
Westminster framed the youth justice transfer as a culmination of prior work rather than a precedent, refused a Section 30 order before the request arrived, and omitted both the Representation of the People Bill and any Wales Bill from the 13 May King's Speech. Starmer is described as open to a devolved-leaders summit in June.
Reform UK
Reform UK
Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk filed pre-action protocol letters framing their LGR challenge as mandate-consistent, while 22 Reform councillors departed in 14 days at an annualised rate nearly three times the 10 percent projection. Richard Tice defended the Harborne 5 million pound gift as unconditional, with no acknowledgement of Farage's two contradictory accounts on record.
SNP (Scottish Government)
SNP (Scottish Government)
Swinney submitted a Section 30 request on 14 May citing the 73-seat SNP-Greens pro-independence bloc and the 2014 Edinburgh Agreement precedent, despite the SNP finishing seven below his self-set 65-seat trigger. Downing Street's contradictory readout of their call suggests Westminster is treating the request as a holding item rather than a live constitutional negotiation.
Welsh Government (Plaid Cymru)
Welsh Government (Plaid Cymru)
ap Iorwerth framed the youth justice transfer as a starting point for his six-power Wales Bill agenda, pressing demands at a phone call with Keir Starmer on 18 May and winning the first statutory function transfer to Cardiff since 1999. The Greens' unwritten confidence-and-supply arrangement gives him 45 of 96 seats, four short of a majority.
Russell Findlay (Scottish Conservatives)
Russell Findlay (Scottish Conservatives)
Findlay refused to resign as Scottish Conservative leader after the party fell to 12 Holyrood seats and lost all five constituency MSPs. He declined Swinney's post-election talks invitation, the only major-party leader to do so.
John Swinney (SNP)
John Swinney (SNP)
Swinney committed on 14 May to a Holyrood Section 30 vote within a week despite winning seven seats fewer than his own trigger threshold, relying on a SNP-Green majority of 73. He tabled a meeting with Starmer; Downing Street disputed that any referendum discussion was agreed.