Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Russia-Ukraine War 2026
13MAY

Largest Lebanon ground op since 2006

3 min read
20:00UTC

A senior Israeli official told Axios the military plans to replicate the Gaza model across all of southern Lebanon. The same objective failed in both the 2006 war and an 18-year occupation.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Israel is attempting militarily what twenty years of UN resolutions could not achieve diplomatically.

Israel has informed the United States it intends to seize all territory south of the Litani River — the largest planned ground operation in Lebanon since 2006 1. A senior Israeli official told Axios: "We are going to do what we did in Gaza" 2. The evacuation zone Israel has imposed already covers 1,470 square kilometres — 14% of Lebanon's total territory, extending beyond the boundary set by UNSC Resolution 1701 and every previous Israeli buffer demand.

The objective is the same one Israel set and failed to achieve in the 2006 war: clear Hezbollah from the strip between the border and the Litani. That war lasted 34 days, killed over 1,100 Lebanese — predominantly civilians per UN counts — and ended with Resolution 1701 requiring only the Lebanese Armed Forces and UNIFIL to operate south of the river. Hezbollah rearmed within months. Before that, Israel occupied southern Lebanon from 1982 to 2000 — 18 years that did not eliminate Hezbollah but instead forged its founding narrative and recruitment engine.

The force now defending southern Lebanon is not the Katyusha-armed militia of the 1980s. Secretary-General Naim Qassem has committed 30,000 fighters including elite Radwan units and described the conflict as existential . Israeli ground forces have already entered Kfar Kila, Houla, Kfar Shouba, Yaroun, and Khiam — the same towns Israel occupied for 18 years . Approximately 5,000 US Marines and sailors are transiting from Japan with expected arrival around 27 March 3, three weeks before Trump's stated four-week war timetable expires .

Israel frames the operation as necessary to halt Hezbollah rocket fire that has made communities across northern Israel uninhabitable — a stated aim that neither the 2006 war nor the 18-year occupation achieved by force. The explicit comparison to Gaza defines what the civilian population of southern Lebanon can expect. 826 people have been killed including 106 children; 830,000 are displaced — matching the total displacement of the entire 33-day 2006 war in under a fortnight. The Trump administration asked Israel to spare Beirut's airport; Israel agreed to that single request and nothing more 4.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Israel wants to clear roughly 30 kilometres of southern Lebanon of Hezbollah fighters, creating a security buffer zone along its northern border. A 2006 UN resolution required exactly this — and was never enforced. Israel's plan is now to take and hold that territory by force. The last time Israel occupied southern Lebanon it stayed 18 years (1982–2000). During that occupation, Hezbollah was founded, grew, and eventually expelled Israeli forces. Israel is re-entering against a Hezbollah that possesses precision rockets, an extensive tunnel network, and 30,000 experienced fighters — a qualitatively different adversary from the one it faced in 1982.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The 'like Gaza' framing simultaneously serves three functions: military objective (sustained suppression), coercive signal to Lebanese civilians, and domestic coalition management (maximalist rhetoric holds together Ben-Gvir and Smotrich). None of the three purposes requires the strategy to be militarily coherent or sustainable. That the phrase came from a senior official — not Netanyahu himself — suggests a tested message, not an unguarded remark.

Root Causes

Over 60,000 Israeli northern border residents have been displaced since October 2023. That 17-month internal displacement has made restoring the north a domestic political survival issue for Netanyahu, entirely independent of broader war objectives. No Israeli government could survive elections without a resolution to the north.

Escalation

The combination of Dermer's appointment (a political, not military, figure) with infrastructure strikes and an already-extended evacuation zone indicates ground operation preparation entering its final phase. Israel moving before US marines arrive around 27 March would signal independent action; waiting would suggest coordinated operation. Neither scenario involves negotiation.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    A ground operation exceeding 1701 lines could trigger Hezbollah precision-missile strikes on Haifa's port and industrial zone, escalating well beyond the current exchange pattern.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Seizure and retention of Lebanese territory north of the 1701 line would establish that military action can override UN Security Council resolutions — with implications for future conflict settlements globally.

    Long term · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Lebanon's already-collapsed state institutions could fragment entirely under military occupation, creating a governance vacuum with no credible reconstruction partner.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Risk

    Simultaneous Gaza and Lebanon ground operations would strain IDF reserve capacity to a degree not tested since 1973, reducing responsiveness to a third front in the West Bank or Syria.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #36 · Israel plans full Litani seizure

Al Jazeera· 15 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Largest Lebanon ground op since 2006
Israel is preparing its largest ground operation in Lebanon since 2006, explicitly modelled on Gaza, with evacuation orders already covering 14% of Lebanese territory. The objective — clearing Hezbollah south of the Litani — failed in both the 2006 war and the 1982–2000 occupation, and the force defending southern Lebanon today has precision-guided missiles and 30,000 committed fighters.
Different Perspectives
NATO eastern flank (B9 + Nordics)
NATO eastern flank (B9 + Nordics)
The B9+Nordic Bucharest joint statement on 13 May reaffirmed Ukraine's sovereignty within internationally recognised borders and backed NATO eastern flank reinforcement; the summit accepted Zelenskyy's bilateral drone deal proposal as a structural alternative to the stalled US export approval pathway, treating it as a European defence architecture question rather than aid delivery.
IAEA / Rafael Grossi
IAEA / Rafael Grossi
Grossi is still negotiating a sixth ZNPP repair ceasefire with no agreement after 50 days of 750 kV line disconnection; the 3 May ERCL drone strike that destroyed environmental monitoring equipment represents a qualitative escalation in infrastructure degradation that the IAEA has documented but cannot compel either party to halt.
Péter Magyar / Hungary
Péter Magyar / Hungary
Magyar's incoming foreign minister pledged on 12 May that Hungary will stop abusing EU veto rights; the pledge is a statement of intent rather than a binding legal commitment, and Magyar's MEPs voted against the €90 billion loan as recently as April, while a planned referendum on Ukraine's EU accession preserves a downstream blocking lever.
EU Council and European Commission
EU Council and European Commission
The Magyar cabinet formation on 12 May removes the Hungary veto that had blocked the €9.1 billion first tranche since February; the Commission is now coordinating the three-document disbursement package for an early-June vote. The structural blocker is gone; the disbursement question is now scheduling, not politics.
Donald Trump / White House
Donald Trump / White House
Trump announced a 9-11 May three-day ceasefire with a 1,000-for-1,000 prisoner exchange attached, then called peace 'getting very close' on 11-13 May while Russia's 800-drone barrage was under way; his public framing adopted Russian diplomatic language without securing any Russian operational concession or verifying the exchange was agreed.
Vladimir Putin / Kremlin
Vladimir Putin / Kremlin
Putin told reporters on 9 May the war is 'coming to an end' while Peskov confirmed on 13 May that territorial demands are unchanged and Russia requires full Ukrainian withdrawal from all four annexed regions; the verbal accommodation costs Moscow nothing and conditions any summit on a pre-finalised treaty Kyiv cannot accept.