Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
3SEP

Russia fired most, gained least in July

3 min read
16:40UTC

ISW put Russia's confirmed July advance at 37.85 sq km against 455.74 sq km a year earlier, in the month it fired a record 376 missiles.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

Russia's July effort hit a record high while the ground it bought hit a record low.

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), the Washington research group whose geolocated daily maps Western governments treat as a reference, published its July roll-up on 1 August. Russian forces took 37.85 sq km of Ukrainian territory through confirmed advances during the month, or 121.56 sq km if infiltration missions are counted, at 1.22 km a day 1. The same measure gave 455.74 sq km in July 2025. That is a fall of roughly 92% in the confirmed-advance rate, year on year.

Two further figures from the same assessment describe what the month cost. Russia fired 376 missiles, its highest monthly total since large-scale strikes began, and took 42,860 casualties, its worst month of 2026 2. Kostiantynivka, the fortified Donetsk city ISW named on 22 July as Russia's unmet main effort , is still not seized. The missile total lands on a defence that has stopped functioning against ballistic weapons: Ukraine's interception rate against them reached zero on 6 July . Russia spent a record month of launches against an air defence that had recorded no ballistic intercepts at all.

One caution belongs beside these numbers. An advance rate measures ground taken, not combat power accumulated, and a commander deliberately trading tempo for force preservation ahead of an autumn call-up would produce this same chart. The gap between 37.85 and 121.56 sq km is itself a methodological artefact: ISW's confirmed figure requires geolocated visual evidence, which structurally undercounts small-group infiltration. Russian and Western maps of the same week can therefore disagree by a factor of three without either side lying.

Mediazona, the exiled Russian outlet that verifies each death by name from obituaries and court records, reached 236,066 confirmed Russian military dead by 3 August, an implied 169 a day 3. Its curve has slowed from roughly 330 a day in early June and about 200 a day on 17 July . That does not contradict ISW's record casualty month. ISW counts killed and wounded together across four weeks; Mediazona counts individually confirmed deaths, so its line trails the fighting by however long the names take to surface. Two instruments, two lags, and one direction of travel that neither can settle alone.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

ISW, the Institute for the Study of War, is a Washington think tank that tracks the front line daily using satellite imagery and local reporting. In July 2026 it found something unusual: Russia fired more missiles and lost more soldiers than in any other month of the year, but captured the least Ukrainian land since the war's pace slowed. That gap matters because it suggests Russia's summer offensive has stalled against Ukraine's defences around the town of Kostiantynivka, even as the human and material cost of trying keeps climbing.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Russia's July tempo is sustainable because its recruitment model runs on contract and convict enlistment rather than a second general mobilisation, so replenishing 42,860 monthly casualties does not require a politically costly draft order.

Kostiantynivka remains unseized because Ukrainian forces hold a prepared defensive belt built since 2022 rather than improvised under pressure, which is why infiltration figures (121.56 sq km) consistently outstrip confirmed captures (37.85 sq km).

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    July's cost-per-kilometre ratio signals Russia has shifted from manoeuvre warfare toward attritional assault around Kostiantynivka, betting on Ukrainian exhaustion over rapid encirclement.

  • Consequence

    Sustained casualty rates above 42,000 a month will pressure Russia's contract-recruitment pipeline, likely pushing enlistment bonuses higher in regions already reporting recruitment shortfalls.

First Reported In

Update #26 · Russia's costliest month, smallest gain

Institute for the Study of War· 3 Aug 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.
Jordan's Armed Forces
Jordan's Armed Forces
Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.