14JUN

Goldman raises US recession odds to 25%

3 min read

11:42UTC

Goldman Sachs's top oil analyst places US recession probability at 25% as the Hormuz supply disruption holds crude 70% above pre-war levels and American households absorb $300 million a day in additional fuel costs.

← Back to US drops red line; signature still slips Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictAssessed

Key takeaway

Goldman's 25% recession probability masks a stagflation trap the Fed cannot resolve with standard tools.

Daan Struyven, Goldman Sachs's head of oil research, raised the bank's US recession probability to 25%, driven by sustained crude price elevation from the strait of Hormuz supply disruption. Brent peaked at $126 per barrel this week — roughly 70% above the pre-war benchmark of $67.41 — before settling around $114. American households are collectively paying an additional $300 million per day at the pump, with national average petrol prices at $3.88 per gallon and California above $5.

The assessment follows Struyven's warning days earlier that Brent could exceed its 2008 all-time intraday record of $147.50 if Hormuz flows remain depressed for 60 days . The war is NOW 24 days old. The IEA has documented an 8 million barrel-per-day supply shortfall — the largest on record — and the 400 million barrels released from strategic petroleum reserves amount to roughly four days of global consumption. Neither the Treasury's sanctions waiver on 140 million barrels of Iranian crude nor Trump's 60-day Jones Act suspension addresses the underlying chokepoint: roughly a fifth of global petroleum trade passes through Hormuz in normal conditions, and the IRGC's selective toll system is replacing military blockade with commercial extraction rather than restoration of open passage.

A 25% recession probability from Goldman Sachs sits above the roughly 15% unconditional baseline that economists assign to any given year — the level at which institutional investors begin repositioning for contraction rather than slowdown. The figure measures the cumulative weight of a war fought over the world's most concentrated oil chokepoint: four weeks of disrupted flows, strategic reserves draining at emergency rates, charter costs quadrupled to $800,000 per day, and war-risk premiums of $3.6–6 million per voyage layered onto every tanker transit. Congressional opposition to the $200 billion war funding request adds fiscal uncertainty on top of energy-price pressure. Every week without resolution compresses the distance between Struyven's current estimate and a full recession call.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

A recession probability of 25% means Goldman's models assess roughly a one-in-four chance of two consecutive quarters of economic contraction within the next 12 months. Before this war, the baseline was closer to 15%, reflecting existing tariff and trade tensions — so the oil shock has added approximately 10 percentage points. The deeper problem is the policy bind this creates. When oil drives inflation up, the standard central bank response is to raise interest rates to cool spending. But raising rates simultaneously slows growth — and if growth is already at risk from the oil shock, the cure can tip the economy into recession. This is the stagflation trap the US last fell into in the 1970s, when the Fed's attempts to fight inflation worsened the economic contraction for years.

Deep Analysis

Synthesis

The 25% figure is a point estimate at current prices. Goldman's own threshold architecture likely puts probability above 50% if crude sustains above $130 for more than four weeks. The recession risk is nonlinear: each additional $10 per barrel accelerates transmission simultaneously through consumption, business investment, and financial conditions channels.

Root Causes

The US economy consumes approximately 20 million bpd; domestic shale covers roughly 13 million bpd, leaving approximately 7 million bpd exposed to global price transmission. That residual import exposure — combined with the global price linkage of domestically produced oil — is sufficient to transmit the full economic magnitude of a Hormuz shock to domestic conditions even with substantial home production.

What could happen next?

Risk
If crude sustains above $130 for more than four weeks, recession probability in Goldman-style models will likely exceed 50%.
Short term · Suggested
Risk
The Fed's inability to cut rates to counter recession risk without worsening oil-driven inflation creates a stagflation dynamic not seen since the 1970s.
Medium term · Assessed
Consequence
A published 25% recession probability materially affects business investment and hiring decisions well before any actual economic contraction occurs.
Immediate · Assessed
Meaning
Goldman's figure is calculated at current prices and does not incorporate the IRGC counter-threat to Gulf energy infrastructure — it is a floor, not a ceiling.
Immediate · Assessed

Source Landscape

This story draws on centre-left-leaning sources from United States

United States

Primary parallel: During the 2022 energy shock, Goldman Sachs raised US recession probability to approximately 35% before the Federal Reserve's rate cycle and rerouted Russian supply reduced the risk within months. The current disruption removes the rerouting mechanism that resolved the 2022 episode, making the probability floor structurally higher.

Counter-parallel: In 2008, Goldman's recession probability models significantly lagged actual recession onset — the financial crisis component overwhelmed the oil price channel before model adjustments captured it. The current shock is a cleaner supply-side test without concurrent financial sector stress, but that apparent cleanness may also produce false model confidence.

Why it’s relevant now

The 2022 precedent suggests Goldman's models respond to supply-side oil shocks with roughly a 10-point probability uplift; the 2008 lag warns that when multiple transmission channels fire simultaneously, model deterioration pace is systematically underestimated.

Goldman's probability models typically incorporate a 3–6 month lagged GDP response to oil price shocks. A sustained 70% oil price increase historically implies a 1.0–1.5% annualised GDP drag through consumption and business investment channels alone, before any financial tightening effects are modelled.

The critical policy variable is the Federal Reserve's rate path. The Fed faces a statutory dual-mandate conflict: price stability argues for holding or raising rates; maximum employment argues for cutting or holding. Goldman's 25% figure likely assumes rates held steady — a more hawkish pivot would raise recession probability materially, whilst a more dovish pivot would worsen inflation and potentially trigger a bond market repricing of long-duration assets.

Consensus view: JP Morgan and Citigroup have published comparable US recession probability upgrades in the 20–30% range in March 2026, with oil price transmission as the primary driver alongside pre-existing tariff uncertainty — indicating Goldman's figure reflects broad institutional consensus rather than an outlier assessment.

Counter-view: The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Institute of World Economics and Politics assesses that the US recession probability underestimates the degree to which China's insulation — via strategic petroleum reserves, Central Asian alternative suppliers, and domestic demand stimulus capacity — decouples its growth trajectory from the Western oil-price shock.

Key tension: Whether the Federal Reserve can hold rates steady whilst tolerating elevated oil-driven inflation — a strategy last attempted in 1974 and abandoned after GDP contracted sharply.

Sources:Axios

Mentions:Chinese Academy of Social Sciences →China →Iran-Azerbaijan Conflict (2026) →Jones Act →Menachem Begin →Strait of Hormuz →Federal Reserve →ServiceNow →Time →Brent Crude →Bank of England →Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) →Goldman Sachs →Donald Trump →US Treasury →JPMorgan Chase →Daan Struyven →

First Reported In

Update #45 · Ultimatum expires; Iran tolls Hormuz at $2m

Axios· 23 Mar 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Brent at $112: 66% above pre-war price

Sustained oil price elevation drove Goldman Sachs to raise recession probability to 25%.

Occurred 19 Mar 2026

Read story →

This Event

Goldman raises US recession odds to 25%

Goldman Sachs's recession probability upgrade quantifies the domestic economic risk of the Hormuz disruption in institutional terms that drive investment decisions, fiscal policy, and consumer confidence across the US economy.

Different Perspectives

Shipping and insurance underwriters

Underwriters can price Houthi strikes because the group announces its targets, but an unclaimed drone at Damietta and a mandatory Iranian insurance scheme both deny them a pattern to price against. War-risk premiums are increasingly being set by the absence of a claimant, not the scale of the damage.

Jordan

Azraq absorbed its fourth Iranian strike in seven weeks, again drawing no direct Jordanian retaliation, only an American one. Amman's exposure, hosting US basing without the Patriot density of Gulf allies, has not changed even as the war around it widens.

Houthi movement

The Houthis' 20 July blockade of Saudi-linked shipping is the injury Riyadh's new 43-nation coalition directly answers, yet the group itself was never asked to join and remains outside every proposal on the table. Sanaa-aligned commentators call the coalition a paper reassurance for insurers rather than a deployable force.

Egypt's Cabinet

Egypt confirmed the Damietta blaze was an attack, not an accident, on soil the war had never touched before. Cairo now faces an unclaimed threat to a facility supplying roughly 7% of its domestic gas, with no author to hold accountable and no pattern yet to defend against.

Oman

Muscat is running the only channel Iran will use, a voluntary Hormuz fee modelled on Malacca, but stayed out of Saudi Arabia's new naval coalition entirely. Oman's mediating leverage depends on treating Hormuz as shared and non-exclusive, the opposite of what Tehran is now demanding of it.

Iraq's Prime Minister

Al-Zaidi cancelled his first official Riyadh visit and convened the Coordination Framework, the coalition that keeps him in power and whose factions sit inside the PMF that Saudi jets just struck. He is caught between a five-year Saudi investment relationship and armed groups inside his own state he does not fully control.