Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
31JUL

Israel hits Iran after Trump said no

3 min read
09:33UTC

Trump publicly urged Netanyahu not to retaliate; on Monday 8 June the IDF struck the Mahshahr petrochemical complex and missile sites inside Iran regardless.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Trump asked Israel not to strike Iran; Israel struck the next day, exposing his leverage as rhetorical.

President Donald Trump publicly urged Benjamin Netanyahu not to hit back at Iran, saying he would call him and "tell him not to strike back" 1. On Monday 8 June the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) struck military targets inside Iran regardless: the Mahshahr Petrochemical Complex in Khuzestan province and surface-to-surface missile launch sites, with blasts reported in Tehran, Tabriz and Isfahan 2. Iranian officials and Israel's Magen David Adom reported minimal-to-no casualties on either side, preliminary 3.

Netanyahu reportedly agreed to the request, then struck anyway. For 100 days the war's central gap was passive, with no US-Iran instrument on paper while the fighting ran on ; on Monday it turned active. Trump asked his closest ally, in public, to hold fire, and the answer on the ground was the Mahshahr strike.

Two readings hold at once. One is plain defiance: Israel will not let Tehran fix the terms of the exchange, and Trump cannot make it. The other is choreography, a good-cop, bad-cop split that lets Israel apply the kinetic pressure Trump keeps off his own diplomatic ledger. No signed US instrument exists to prove Washington controls the kinetic track, so the burden of demonstrating coordination sits with The White House.

Either way, the strike adds a fresh complication to the negotiating file. Rezaei's $24bn precondition was already unresolved; a unilateral Israeli strike against Trump's stated wish now sits beside it as a US-Israel alignment gap.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Israel's military struck inside Iran on 8 June, hitting a large petrochemical factory in Khuzestan province (south-western Iran) and sites used to launch surface-to-surface missiles. Explosions were also heard in Tehran, Tabriz and Isfahan. US President Trump had publicly asked Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu not to strike back after Iran's missile attack. Israel struck anyway. Mahshahr is one of Iran's biggest chemical production hubs. Israel hit the same complex in April 2026. Netanyahu reportedly told Trump he had agreed not to strike, then authorised the attack. No verified casualties were reported in the early hours, though that may change.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Israel's coalition politics under Netanyahu require maintaining offensive operational tempo: Ben Gvir and Smotrich's continued participation in government is conditioned on rejecting any ceasefire that does not meet maximalist terms.

Netanyahu's government falls if he accepts US-brokered de-escalation without a full agreement. Compliance with Trump's restraint requests is blocked by Israeli coalition arithmetic, not by strategic disagreement about Iran's threat level.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Trump's public restraint request failing within 24 hours removes his ability to use 'I can control Israel' as a credible bargaining chip with Tehran in ongoing nuclear negotiations.

  • Risk

    A second Mahshahr strike compounds the April damage to Iran's domestic fuel supply, increasing civilian pressure that could either force concessions or harden hardliner resistance to any deal.

First Reported In

Update #121 · Trump said don't strike; Israel struck Iran

Jerusalem Post· 8 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.