Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
31JUL

IRGC thanks Jordanians for helping it aim

3 min read
09:33UTC

The IRGC says its 21st Nasr-2 wave destroyed 20 hangars at Azraq and Aqaba and damaged C-17 and P-8 aircraft, and it thanked Jordanians for supplying intelligence. No US, Jordanian or Kuwaiti source corroborates any of it.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Tehran's uncorroborated claim thanks Jordanian soldiers for intelligence, a line aimed at Amman's domestic politics.

The IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) Aerospace Force claimed on 20 July that the 21st wave of its Operation Nasr-2 struck the Azraq area and Aqaba Airport in Jordan, destroying 20 hangars used to station troops, killing "dozens of American terrorist forces" and heavily damaging C-17 cargo transports and P-8 surveillance aircraft 1. No US, Jordanian or Kuwaiti source corroborates any part of it.

Press TV, Iran's state broadcaster, carried the account, so the figures stand as Tehran's assertion and nothing more. The IRGC is Iran's parallel military, answerable to the supreme leader rather than to the regular general staff, and its Aerospace Force holds the missile and drone inventory that has been used against Gulf and Jordanian targets throughout this war.

The line worth reading twice sits at the end of the statement. The IRGC thanked "the Jordanian public and members of the country's armed forces for providing intelligence" 2. Nothing in that sentence carries military value. Coordinates for a base hit repeatedly since 9 July do not need publicising, and a real source inside a partner military would not be advertised in a broadcast. The likelier audience sits in Amman: naming no one but implicating everyone, the line invites Jordanians to wonder which of their own soldiers helped, at a moment when The Kingdom is already fielding questions about the base where American service members died . Jordan has not responded.

The banner moved as well. Iran's regular army, the Artesh, claimed the Gulf target set under its own name on 16 July and called it Operation Saeqeh , and by 18 July Iranian state media had that campaign running to phases 14 and 15 across Kuwait, Jordan and Bahrain . This wave arrives under a different label from a different institution. Two Iranian militaries claiming the same enemies in the same week says more about who is competing for credit in Tehran than about what happened at Aqaba.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's Revolutionary Guard says it struck a Jordanian air base and airport, claiming to have destroyed hangars and damaged US aircraft, and thanking ordinary Jordanians for supplying intelligence. None of this has been confirmed by Jordan, the US or Kuwait, so it should be read as an Iranian claim, not an established fact. The 'thanks to Jordanians' line is new and inflammatory: it implies people inside Jordan helped Iran target a US ally, something Jordan's government has not responded to.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    An unconfirmed claim of Jordanian civilian intelligence-sharing could strain US-Jordan trust even if the underlying strike claim proves false, since the accusation itself is now public.

  • Precedent

    Two Iranian services claiming the same Jordanian target set within days suggests competition for domestic credit is now shaping which branch announces which strike.

First Reported In

Update #157 · IAEA takes up Darkhovin as utilities become targets

Press TV· 20 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.