Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
European Energy Markets
1JUN

Eight LNG cargoes diverted to Asia

3 min read
08:52UTC

Vessel tracking shows Europe losing the cargo-by-cargo competition with Asian buyers, as the JKM-TTF spread collapses to near zero.

← Back to Germany's TSOs call the refill model deadJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

The JKM-TTF spread at USD 0.10/MMBtu erases Europe's cost advantage for attracting flexible LNG cargoes.

Kpler vessel tracking data shows eight Atlantic LNG cargoes (five US-origin, three Nigerian) have been diverted from Europe to Asia via the Cape of Good Hope since the conflict began in late February. EU weekly LNG imports fell 15% to 3.3 million tonnes as a result.

Behind the diversions sits the JKM-TTF spread, the gap between Asian spot LNG and the European benchmark. It narrowed to USD 0.10/MMBtu in early April, effectively zero. When the spread was positive, Europe could outbid Asia for flexible cargoes; at parity, shippers route to whichever buyer offers better terms on a cargo-by-cargo basis. US LNG still accounts for 58% of EU LNG imports under long-term contracts, but spot volumes follow the Asian premium.

Kpler's broader supply arithmetic is tight. Alternative sources cover under two million of the monthly shortfall. That gap persists until Ras Laffan repairs advance or new US export capacity comes online, Europe competes for a shrinking pool of flexible supply.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Europe normally imports large quantities of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the United States and West Africa, shipped across the Atlantic Ocean. Eight of those tanker ships have recently been redirected to Asia instead. This is happening because Asian countries are currently paying similar prices to Europe for gas. When there is no significant price advantage for coming to Europe, shipping companies and traders route cargoes to wherever their contracts or logistics make most sense, which right now is Asia.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The cargo diversions reflect a structural feature of global LNG contracts: portfolio LNG suppliers (Shell, TotalEnergies, BP) who purchase US LNG under long-term HH-indexed contracts and resell it on the spot market optimise delivery destinations quarterly, not in real time. Once a diversion decision is made and a vessel is en route via Cape of Good Hope, that cargo is effectively committed for 6-8 weeks regardless of subsequent TTF movements.

The five US-origin cargoes in the diversions are almost certainly portfolio volumes from Shell's Sabine Pass offtake or TotalEnergies' Sabine Pass Train 5 contracts. These companies have explicit Asian portfolio commitments that take precedence over spot European sales when Asian demand is elevated.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    The near-zero JKM-TTF spread removes Europe's primary market mechanism for attracting flexible spot LNG cargoes, making any further supply disruption directly additive to the storage deficit.

  • Opportunity

    A Hormuz normalisation that resumes Middle East LNG flows could widen the JKM-TTF spread in Europe's favour within weeks, attracting Atlantic cargoes back and accelerating injection season recovery.

Sources:Kpler·OilPrice.com
Mentions:Kpler →European Union →Japan →South Korea →Bloomberg →Cape of Good Hope →Prima →Qatar →Nigeria →United States →Ras Laffan Industrial City →JKM →TTF →
First Reported In

Update #1 · Europe's thinnest gas cushion since 2018

Kpler· 13 Apr 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Eight LNG cargoes diverted to Asia
The JKM-TTF spread at USD 0.10/MMBtu eliminates Europe's traditional price premium for attracting flexible cargoes, turning every spot cargo into a bidding contest.
Led to
Russian LNG ban lands 25 April, no replacement named
Atlantic LNG cargo diversions to Asia (now close to a dozen) compound the supply gap created by the Russian LNG ban with no European replacement supply named.
Occurred 15 Apr 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp gas trading desks
Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp gas trading desks
TTF failing to sustain EUR 47-plus with 51 mcm/day of Norwegian supply offline confirms EUR 50 as a diplomatic ceiling rather than a physical floor; the curve is priced as a Troll-restart long, not a storage-deficit short. Winter Cal-26 long versus summer TTF short is the structural position FNB Gas's broken-mechanism verdict supports.
European Commission and DG Energy
European Commission and DG Energy
The Commission lowered the mandatory fill target from 90% to 80% and published the 11 May ETS benchmark revision saving industry EUR 4 billion, choosing industrial competitiveness over storage ambition at the moment physical injection margins narrowed. Berlin's confirmation of no summer injection scheme came with no Commission counter-instrument.
Hungarian and Slovak industrial offtakers
Hungarian and Slovak industrial offtakers
Hungary and Slovakia pay a EUR 2-plus delivered-gas premium over TTF benchmark prices regardless of ACER's improved pipeline-congestion reading, and both are litigating the 17 June EU pipeline ban at the CJEU (ID:3229). A post-17 June tightening of TurkStream supply would widen that basis further.
EBN and Dutch state
EBN and Dutch state
The Dutch state trebled EBN's mandate from 25 to 80 TWh, leaving EBN the sole active Dutch injector after the January auctions drew zero commercial bookings (ID:3637). The EUR 233m state budget cap is the binding cost ceiling; above-market injection at EBN is a fiscal transfer, not a market outcome.
CRE and French gas operators
CRE and French gas operators
France's 100% mandatory CRE booking order is carrying French injection regardless of the inverted strip, providing EU aggregate cover that Germany's abolished levy cannot supply. The order renews annually on CRE decision, making it a political risk rather than a structural guarantee.
FNB Gas and German TSOs
FNB Gas and German TSOs
FNB Gas formally declared the market-based storage-refill framework broken on 27 May, citing zero-clearing January auctions, ten days after Berlin ruled out any summer injection scheme. The intervention sets the institutional predicate for reintroducing a storage levy; the Gasspeicherumlage precedent (2022-25) confirms the administrative path is open.