Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash
17JUN

Virginia signs first per-kWh power tax

3 min read
10:13UTC

Abigail Spanberger signed Virginia's $0.011-per-kilowatt-hour data-centre tax on 30 June, the first US levy on compute power itself, and the rival backup-generator fee died with it.

IndustryDeveloping
Key takeaway

Virginia now taxes the power a data centre burns, including the power it makes on site.

Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger signed a $0.011 per kilowatt-hour consumption tax on data-centre electricity into law on 30 June, a day before it took effect on 1 July. 1 It is the first US charge levied on the power a computing campus actually draws, and it reaches every source: utility supply, competitive retail from third-party suppliers in deregulated markets, and behind-the-meter self-generation, the private gas and battery power that never touches the public grid.

The signature settled a months-long fight over method. The state legislature had passed the tax on 22 June , but Senate negotiators were still pushing a rival $35-45 per kilowatt charge on backup generators, the "Lucas fee" , to break a budget deadlock. Signing the consumption model killed that alternative. Virginia's State Corporation Commission, the utility regulator, will collect monthly, with the first payment due in September.

Rob Gramlich of the energy consultancy Grid Strategies puts the effective rate rise near 10%. A 500-megawatt (MW) campus will owe about $48m a year, a full gigawatt campus close to $100m. 2 Operators pass most of that through to their cloud customers. The mechanism matters more than the rate: a per-kilowatt capacity fee taxes installed hardware, which reads in court as a regulatory taking, while a tax on electricity drawn is an ordinary excise. Virginia picked the litigation-proof instrument, and that is what other states will copy or reject.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Virginia just started charging data centres for every unit of electricity they use, whether that power comes from the grid or from a generator or battery on site. The self-generated power used to escape state tax entirely. A company running a modest server room barely notices the charge. A campus the size of a small town's power plant can end up owing tens of millions of dollars a year. Virginia's utility regulator, the State Corporation Commission, will collect the money monthly starting in September.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Virginia's choice of mechanism turns on a legal distinction the fight over the rate obscured. A fee on installed generating capacity risks a Takings Clause challenge because it prices equipment an operator already owns, while a tax on electricity consumed prices an ongoing transaction and reads to courts as an ordinary excise. The Senate's own $35-45 per kilowatt generator fee tested the riskier instrument first and lost.

The tax also closes a gap federal curtailment could not reach. The Department of Energy's 2026 curtailment orders in PJM territory applied only to grid-connected power; Virginia's consumption tax is the first instrument to price behind-the-meter generation, the private gas and battery supply operators built specifically to sit outside federal reach.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    Virginia's consumption-tax model becomes the template other high-density states test before drafting comparable legislation.

  • Risk

    The tax's $600m annual cap and 30 June 2028 sunset mean Virginia may need to renegotiate the mechanism again as more campuses come online.

First Reported In

Update #9 · US data-centre backlash becomes law

Tech Times· 7 Jul 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Virginia signs first per-kWh power tax
It gives every other state a working template for taxing what a data centre burns rather than what it installs, on the instrument least exposed to a takings lawsuit.
Different Perspectives
Government of Odisha
Government of Odisha
Odisha signed a $1.5bn agreement with HCLTech and Sarvam AI on 24 July for a sovereign AI data centre in Bhubaneswar, targeting 2028 operations. While regulators elsewhere price developers out of the queue, Odisha is bidding state financial assistance to bring capacity in, betting the AI infrastructure boom is worth courting rather than rationing.
Switch Datacenters and Uithoorn
Switch Datacenters and Uithoorn
The developer, the municipality, Liander and dozens of greenhouse growers signed a waste-heat agreement letting a 60 MVA facility proceed under a provincial rule that bans sites above 5 MVA. The public-interest exception argues the site relieves rather than adds to grid congestion, working around a standing ban from inside rather than waiting for it to change.
Iskandar Puteri residents
Iskandar Puteri residents
Residents protested in February over falling water pressure they attribute to ZDATA's 300 MW construction; ZDATA disputes causation and has not yet resolved the dispute with its wastewater-only pivot. The complaint sits unadjudicated while the operator advertises compliance to state authorities the residents cannot address directly.
Microsoft
Microsoft
DC Byte reports Microsoft looking to the Nordics for new capacity while Dublin's regional share falls to 15 per cent, though this is a market-intelligence inference rather than a company statement. Microsoft keeps its existing Dublin cloud region, which is costly to relocate, while directing new investment where power is cheaper and the queue is shorter.
ISO New England
ISO New England
ISO-NE proposed excluding new large loads from its Installed Capacity Requirement entirely, forcing data centres to bring their own generation or accept curtailment, even though New England's demand has been flat or falling for a decade. The reform is pre-emptive, written before the region has felt the strain PJM and MISO already report.
Ofgem
Ofgem
Ofgem opened its Data Centre Commitment Fee consultation on 29 July, arguing that free options on grid capacity let developers bank places on ten sites and abandon nine, crowding out projects that would build. It expects the deposit to filter the queue before the rule even takes final form.