8SEP

Rubio calls reform not dramatic enough

3 min read

13:24UTC

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio dismissed Cuba's 176-measure reform the day after parliament passed it: 'Not dramatic enough. It's not going to fix it.' The Trump administration signalled no change to the sanctions regime in response.

← Back to Havana makes the hiring middleman optional Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsDeveloping

Key takeaway

Washington holds the levers the reform needs, and Rubio confirmed none will be released.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio dismissed Cuba's reform package within a day of its passage. "What they announced yesterday is not dramatic enough," he said. "It's not going to fix it" ¹. Rubio is the Trump administration's senior Cuba-policy voice, a Cuban-American who has driven the 2026 sanctions escalation. The administration signalled no modification to the sanctions regime in response to the reform. Rubio had previously told Cuban-American audiences that economic reform could ease pressure; the reform arrived and the pressure did not move.

The rejection lands on Pedro Monreal's four missing inputs. Foreign currency, energy and external demand are the precise levers Washington holds, and Rubio's response confirms none will be released to supply the new market functions Havana legalised. The legislation unlocks functions on paper that the embargo keeps shut in practice.

The timing closes off an avenue the opposition had already tried and lost. After the US Senate war-powers track died on a 51-47 vote in April , pressure on Cuba shifted from Congress toward the executive sanctions machinery Rubio runs. Diaz-Canel legislated private capital to alter that machinery's calculus from the inside. Rubio's answer is that domestic liberalisation, absent democratic change, buys no relief on the sanctions that are doing the economic damage.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is Cuban-American and has spent his entire political career taking the toughest possible position on Cuba. When Cuba announced its biggest economic reforms in 60 years, he dismissed them as not good enough the next day. This matters because Cuba's new economic rules cannot work without American cooperation. The US controls the sanctions that block Cuba's oil supply, prevent foreign banks from doing business with the island, and stop most investment. Rubio is saying that Cuba would need to do far more, including releasing political prisoners and allowing political competition, before Washington would ease those restrictions. For the reforms to have any practical effect, Cuba needs the US to ease at least some pressure. Rubio's statement says that will not happen.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Rubio's rejection reflects a structural asymmetry in the US-Cuba negotiation space: Washington's stated preconditions, release of named political prisoners, end to repression, democratic elections, access for Starlink, and compensation for 1959 expropriations, are individually negotiable in theory but collectively represent more than the Cuban Communist Party can grant without regime change.

The CUPET designation framed as 'recovering assets expropriated in the 1960 nationalisation' is particularly significant: that framing shifts the legal basis from emergency powers toward a property-rights claim that requires Congress to resolve. Discretionary general licences can waive emergency-power sanctions; a Congressional property-rights claim cannot be administratively waived. This makes the energy blockade structurally harder to lift than it appears from the outside.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Washington's refusal to modify sanctions in response to the reforms removes the external hard-currency and energy inputs without which Pedro Monreal's four preconditions cannot be met.
Immediate · Reported
Risk
The rejection reinforces the Cuban government's internal narrative that the US is a permanent adversary rather than a negotiating counterpart, reducing the domestic political cost of further confrontation.
Short term · Assessed
Precedent
If the Cuban-American electoral incentive persists in 2026 midterm politics, the threshold for sanctions relief will remain conditioned on a political transition, not incremental economic reform.
Medium term · Assessed

Source Landscape

This story draws on centre-left-leaning sources from Qatar

Qatar

Primary parallel: South Africa's tricameral parliament reforms of 1984 were rejected by the ANC and the international sanctions community as insufficient, even though they represented genuine constitutional change.

The rejecting parties' argument was structural: reforms that preserve the essential power arrangement, even if they liberalise specific elements, cannot be accepted as satisfying the demands for systemic change. Rubio's framing ('not dramatic enough') applies exactly the same logic: the 176 measures do not transfer power, they licence activities within a structure the Cuban Communist Party retains.

Counter-parallel: The Obama-era thaw of 2015-2016 occurred without Cuba releasing all political prisoners or holding elections. That precedent shows sanctions relief can precede complete democratic transition.

The difference is that the 2015 opening required a bilateral diplomatic process involving the Vatican as mediator and quiet negotiations; Rubio's June 19 dismissal arrives with no equivalent process in play since the Vatican channel went quiet after the 9 May Rubio-Leo XIV audience .

Consensus view: The Washington Post and Al Jazeera coverage documented Rubio's explicit statement alongside Diaz-Canel's denial that the reforms were driven by US pressure.

The juxtaposition is deliberate: Rubio is signalling that even if Cuba claims internal motivation, Washington's threshold for sanctions relief remains above what the 176 measures deliver. Rubio's prior public statements indicated economic liberalisation could ease pressure; the June 19 dismissal walks back that implicit offer.

Counter-view: The Cuban government's framing through Cubadebate and Granma treats Rubio's rejection as confirmation that the embargo is politically motivated rather than conditioned on reform. This framing serves the domestic audience: it allows the Communist Party to claim reforms are genuine while attributing their failure to Washington rather than to design flaws.

The WOLA (Washington Office on Latin America) position is that US Cuba policy under the Trump administration is conditioned on Cuban-American electoral politics in Florida, not on a coherent reform metric.

Key tension: Whether there exists any reform package Cuba could announce that would meet Washington's threshold, or whether the Cuban-American Florida constituency makes any sanctions relief politically impossible for the Trump administration regardless of Cuban actions.

Sources:Al Jazeera

Mentions:Marco Rubio →Cuba →Trump administration →Havana →Cubadebate →Washington Office on Latin America →Granma →Washington →US Senate →South Africa →Al Jazeera →Florida →Washington Post →Miguel Díaz-Canel →Communist Party of Cuba →

First Reported In

Update #8 · Cuba opens its economy as the door slams

Al Jazeera· 19 Jun 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Cuba opens its market in 176 steps

Rubio's dismissal was a direct response to the National Assembly's 176-measure reform passage

Occurred 18 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

Rubio calls reform not dramatic enough

Foreign currency, energy and external demand are the levers Washington holds, and Rubio's response confirms none will be released to supply the new market functions.

Different Perspectives

China

Foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun called China-Cuba cooperation open, transparent and legitimate on 11 August, after the 6 August designations reached Cuban military attachés posted to China and Russia. The statement named no new assistance.

Russia

The Russian embassy in Havana said on 31 August that expanding BRICS full membership is not on the agenda, declining the upgrade Cuba had sought before the New Delhi summit. Moscow remains Cuba's most reliable outside supplier but stopped short of the diplomatic step Havana wanted.

Dominican Republic

The Dominican Republic ordered nine Cuban diplomats and their families to leave on 13 August without stating a reason, a rupture Havana has not been given an explanation for. Neither government has since clarified what prompted the expulsion.

Observatorio Cubano de Derechos Humanos

OCDH's Madrid-based survey found 94 per cent of Cubans in extreme poverty and 84 per cent distrusting Havana's own reform measures, fieldwork closed three weeks before Decree 325. The group monitors from exile because independent rights monitoring cannot operate legally on the island, and Lowdown could not reach a comparable on-island voice.

Cuban government (Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla)

Rodríguez answered the 3 September designations on Cubadebate the same day without naming any of the five sanctioned entities, calling the wave collective punishment. Havana has used the same anti-blockade framing for each prior wave rather than contesting individual designations.

US Treasury (OFAC) and State Department

OFAC designated Banco Exterior de Cuba and four traders on 3 September; its SDN entry links the individual named alongside them only to Alejandro Castro Espín. The State Department's own announcement, not OFAC's listing, called that individual "a grandson of Raul Castro" and the designated entities exploiters of Cuba's resources "for the benefit of the regime."