Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
E.O. 13224
LegislationUS

E.O. 13224

US counterterrorism executive order of 23 September 2001, blocking property of persons supporting terrorism.

Last refreshed: 29 May 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Why does sanctioning Iran's toll body block a Hormuz peace deal?

Timeline for E.O. 13224

#11128 May

Provided statutory authority for the PGSA designation

Iran Conflict 2026: US sanctions the strait it will reopen
#861 May
View full timeline →
Common Questions
What is E.O. 13224 and how does it relate to Iran sanctions?
E.O. 13224, signed by President Bush on 23 September 2001, blocks property of persons supporting terrorism. OFAC uses it alongside E.O. 13902 to sanction IRGC-linked Iranian entities, citing the IRGC's 2019 terrorism designation.Source: US Federal Register
Why does OFAC cite both E.O. 13224 and E.O. 13902 in Iran sanctions?
Dual citation maximises legal coverage: E.O. 13902 targets Iran's economic sectors directly, while E.O. 13224 reaches entities supporting designated terrorist organisations such as the IRGC. Together they are harder to challenge individually in court.Source: OFAC
When was the IRGC designated under E.O. 13224?
The IRGC was designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation and under E.O. 13224 in April 2019, during the first Trump administration's maximum-pressure Iran campaign.Source: US Department of State

Background

Executive Order 13224, signed by President George W. Bush on 23 September 2001 twelve days after the 11 September attacks, blocks the property and interests in property of foreign persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support acts of terrorism. It also extends blocking authority to persons determined to be owned or controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of, designated individuals and entities. In its most recent major application, OFAC designated Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA) under E.O. 13224 on 28 May 2026, part of Treasury's "Economic Fury" campaign, simultaneously with a tentative 60-day memorandum of understanding to reopen the Strait of Hormuz; the legal collision means any vessel using a reopened strait coordinated by the sanctioned PGSA would be transacting with a designated counterparty.

In the broader 2026 Iran conflict, E.O. 13224 is routinely cited alongside E.O. 13902 in OFAC enforcement actions. On 1 May 2026, OFAC invoked both orders in its General Licence W package, designating Bonyad Mostazafan and the tanker NEW FUSION as prohibited channels for Hormuz toll payments. On 15 May 2026, twelve individuals and entities including three IRGC officials and nine Shell companies were designated under the order for routing IRGC oil sales into China. The dual-order citation is standard OFAC practice: stacking post-9/11 terrorism-sanctions authority with Iran-specific executive orders maximises the legal basis and complicates legal challenges.

E.O. 13224 designations are hard to unwind because the order rests on terrorism authority, not oil or nuclear sanctions, which means de-listing requires a finding that the designated entity no longer poses a terrorism-related threat, a higher bar than lifting a trade restriction. The IRGC's 2019 designation under the order as a terrorist organisation was a structural expansion that enabled OFAC to reach IRGC-affiliated entities such as Bonyad Mostazafan via the aiding-and-abetting provisions. For the PGSA designation, unless OFAC issues a specific general licence or de-lists the body, the reopened-Hormuz commercial terms remain legally unworkable from the first vessel transit.

More questions
What is Executive Order 13224 and how does it work?
E.O. 13224 was signed by President George W. Bush on 23 September 2001 to block the property of foreign persons who commit or support terrorism. OFAC uses it to ADD individuals and entities to the Specially Designated Nationals list, freezing their US assets and barring Americans from transacting with them.Source: OFAC
Why did the US sanction Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority under EO 13224?
On 28 May 2026, OFAC designated the PGSA under E.O. 13224 as part of Treasury's Economic Fury campaign, characterising the toll body as monetising IRGC state-sponsored terrorism. The designation occurred on the same day as a tentative Hormuz reopening deal, creating a direct legal conflict.Source: US Treasury
Why is an E.O. 13224 sanction harder to remove than other Iran sanctions?
Because E.O. 13224 rests on terrorism authority rather than oil or nuclear sanctions, de-listing requires OFAC to find the entity no longer poses a terrorism-related threat. That is a higher legal bar than lifting a trade restriction and typically requires a formal review rather than a political agreement.Source: event
When was the IRGC designated under Executive Order 13224?
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps was designated under E.O. 13224 as a foreign terrorist organisation in April 2019. This enabled OFAC to reach IRGC-affiliated entities via the order's support and control provisions without needing a separate Iran-specific order.Source: OFAC
How does Executive Order 13224 affect Hormuz shipping after the PGSA designation?
With the PGSA on the SDN list under E.O. 13224, any commercial vessel using a PGSA-coordinated Hormuz transit would be transacting with a sanctioned counterparty. Foreign banks financing those charters risk secondary sanctions, making the Hormuz reopening terms commercially unworkable unless OFAC issues a general licence or de-lists the PGSA.Source: event
Source Material