Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
9th Circuit
OrganisationUS

9th Circuit

Largest US appeals court; its own DOJ voter-data ruling remains pending seven weeks after argument.

Last refreshed: 9 July 2026 · Appears in 3 active topics

Key Question

Does the still-pending 9th Circuit ruling create a split with the Sixth Circuit?

Timeline for 9th Circuit

#128 Jul

Received DOJ's petition for rehearing en banc on the Michigan voter file

US Midterms 2026: DOJ appeals its Michigan voter-file loss
#1124 Jun

Affirmed dismissal of the DOJ's demand for Michigan's unredacted voter rolls, 2-1

US Midterms 2026: Sixth Circuit rejects DOJ roll demand
#1016 Jun
View full timeline →
Common Questions
When is the 9th Circuit hearing the Oregon voter data case?
The 9th Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument in the Oregon DOJ voter-data appeal on 19 May 2026.Source: 9th Circuit scheduling, April 2026
What states does the 9th Circuit cover?
The 9th Circuit covers nine western states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington, plus Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.
What would it mean if the 9th Circuit overturns the Oregon ruling?
A reversal would reopen the DOJ voter-data lawsuit against Oregon and potentially provide circuit-level authority to revive similar suits in California, Michigan, and Rhode Island, all dismissed using the same legal reasoning.

Background

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is the largest of the 13 US federal appellate courts, covering nine western states (California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Alaska and Hawaii) with 29 active judgeships. Appointed largely by Democratic presidents, it is regarded as the most liberal-leaning of the circuit courts, and its jurisdiction covers states holding 67 of 435 House seats and two competitive Senate races.

The 9th Circuit heard oral argument in United States v. Oregon on 19 May 2026, the first appellate test of whether DOJ's NVRA-based voter-data demands survive the portable dismissal reasoning that district courts across California, Michigan, Oregon, Rhode Island and Massachusetts applied to throw out the suits. A three-judge panel of Clinton and Obama appointees showed scepticism toward DOJ's framing of the NVRA as conferring standing independent of a demonstrated voter-disenfranchisement injury, but set no ruling date; decisions typically follow within 60 to 90 days of argument.

By late June the first-mover timeline had flipped: the Sixth Circuit, not the 9th, became the first circuit anywhere to rule, affirming a Michigan dismissal 2-1 in United States v. Benson on 24 June under the separate Civil Rights Act of 1960 theory. As of 9 July the 9th Circuit's own Oregon ruling remains undecided, more than seven weeks after argument; the DOJ has since petitioned the Sixth Circuit for en banc rehearing of its Michigan loss, so whichever court rules next will be read as either reinforcing or splitting from the other, a split that would put the question on a faster track to the Supreme Court.

More questions
What did the 9th Circuit hear on 19 May 2026 about voter data?
The 9th Circuit heard oral argument in United States v. Oregon, the first appellate test of whether DOJ's NVRA-based voter-data demands survive the portable dismissal reasoning that six district courts have applied to throw out the suits.Source: Lowdown
Why does the 9th Circuit voter-data ruling matter for the 2026 elections?
The 9th Circuit covers nine western states holding 67 House seats. An affirmance consolidates DOJ dismissals across the circuit; a reversal reopens the suits and creates a circuit split requiring SCOTUS to resolve before November 2026.Source: Lowdown
How many courts have dismissed DOJ voter-data lawsuits so far?
Six district courts had dismissed DOJ voter-data suits by 19 May 2026 — in California, Michigan, Oregon, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Arizona (28 April) — all applying the portable standing reasoning from the Massachusetts ruling.Source: Lowdown
What is the portable dismissal reasoning in the DOJ voter-data cases?
The Massachusetts standing theory holds that federal courts lack jurisdiction to hear DOJ NVRA challenges unless DOJ can specify a concrete legal injury, not merely a political outcome. Courts adopted this reasoning wholesale from Massachusetts and applied it in subsequent DOJ suits.Source: Lowdown
Has the 9th Circuit ruled on the Oregon voter-data appeal yet?
No. As of late June 2026 the 9th Circuit had not ruled on the Oregon appeal it heard on 19 May. The Sixth Circuit became the first circuit to rule on the issue, affirming a separate Michigan dismissal 2-1 on 24 June.Source: Lowdown