Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
16MAY

Hengaw documents five-prison execution cluster; Gorgan appears for first time

3 min read
12:41UTC

Hengaw documented seven executions on 13 May across five prisons in Birjand, Tabriz, Kerman, and Gorgan, with Gorgan appearing in the wartime register for the first time and Ehsan Afrashteh's secret execution on espionage charges confirmed.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Five simultaneous executions across four cities imply central standing orders; Gorgan's first appearance shows the programme widening.

Hengaw, the Norway-based Kurdish human rights monitor that has become the principal independent casualty tracker for the 2026 Iran conflict, documented seven executions across five prisons on 13 May 1. Five unnamed prisoners were executed simultaneously in prisons in Birjand (South Khorasan province), Tabriz, Kerman, and Gorgan (two in Gorgan); Mohammad Abbasi was executed in a separate action the same day. Ehsan Afrashteh's secret execution on espionage charges was confirmed as part of the cluster Hengaw first reported on 12-13 May .

Gorgan, capital of Golestan province in Iran's north-east, appeared in Hengaw's wartime execution register for the first time. Previous documentation by Hengaw had mapped a geographic concentration in the Tehran region, anchored by the Shakourzadeh execution at Qezel Hesar prison in Karaj and the earlier Karaj cluster. Gorgan's first appearance, 600 km north-east of Tehran, indicates the programme is broadening geographically rather than remaining concentrated by proximity to the capital's judicial infrastructure.

The coordination visible in the five-prison cluster is not a feature of Iran's peacetime judicial system. Simultaneous executions across prisons in four cities in a single day imply centrally issued standing orders rather than independent provincial court calendars, each operating on its own sentencing timeline. The IRGC's security apparatus has been using the war as judicial cover for a category of detainee held before the conflict began: the espionage charging pattern, "Israel-linked moharebeh" (enmity against God), has now appeared in cases from Mashhad to Karaj. The 13 May cluster adds Gorgan to that register.

The Shahbakhsh-Afrashteh cluster plus the five unnamed prisoners on 13 May add at least eight to Hengaw's wartime count across the 12-13 May window. The total wartime execution register has risen sharply since the Shakourzadeh documentation established the Tehran-area baseline.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Hengaw, a human rights group based in Norway that tracks executions in Iran, documented seven people killed in prisons on 13 May. Five were executed at the same time across four different cities, which is unusual: normally each prison runs on its own schedule. A city called Gorgan, far north-east of Tehran, appeared in Hengaw's records for the first time. The pattern suggests someone issued a central order for multiple prisons to act on the same day, using the cover of the war and a nationwide internet shutdown to limit outside scrutiny.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The IRGC security apparatus operates a category of detainee held before the conflict began, arrested under the 2022-2023 Mahsa Amini protest wave and charged with espionage-for-Israel through the "moharebeh and Israel" charging pattern that Hengaw first documented in Mashhad .

The wartime internet blackout, 1,704+ cumulative hours, provides operational cover: executions that would generate immediate diaspora and international media pressure during peacetime occur inside a communications blackout that delays confirmation by days.

Gorgan's first appearance is a geographic extension indicator: the programme is not confined to provinces near Tehran's judicial infrastructure but is operating across Iran's full provincial prison system. That geographic breadth implies a national-level coordination instruction, not a series of independently timed provincial decisions.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Gorgan's first appearance in the wartime execution register confirms the programme extends beyond the Tehran-area judicial infrastructure where Hengaw established its baseline; every provincial prison in Iran is now within the documented geographic scope of the cluster pattern.

  • Risk

    The 1,704+ hour internet blackout suppresses the speed at which execution clusters reach international monitors; the actual number of executions in the 12-13 May window may exceed the seven Hengaw has confirmed, with further cases surfacing as blackout lifts.

First Reported In

Update #97 · Chips for Beijing, no paper for Iran

Jewish Insider· 14 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
India (BRICS meeting host, grey-market beneficiary)
India (BRICS meeting host, grey-market beneficiary)
New Delhi hosted the BRICS foreign ministers' meeting on 14 May that Araghchi attended under the Minab168 designation, giving India a front-row seat to Iran's diplomatic positioning. India's state refiners have been absorbing discounted Iranian crude through grey-market routing since April; Brent at $109.30 means every barrel sourced outside the formal market generates a structural saving.
Hengaw / Kurdish human rights monitors
Hengaw / Kurdish human rights monitors
Hengaw's daily reports from Iran's Kurdish provinces remain the sole independent cross-check on Iran's judicial activity during the conflict. Two executions across Qom and Karaj Central prisons on 15 May and five Kurdish detentions on 15-16 May indicate the wartime judicial pipeline is operating independently of military tempo.
Pakistan (mediator and bilateral partner)
Pakistan (mediator and bilateral partner)
Islamabad spent its diplomatic capital as the US-Iran MOU carrier to secure LNG passage for two Qatari vessels through a bilateral Pakistan-Iran agreement, spending its mediation credit for direct economic gain. China's public endorsement of Pakistan's mediatory role on 13 May is the structural reward.
China and BRICS bloc
China and BRICS bloc
Beijing endorsed Pakistan's mediatory role on 13 May, one day after the BRICS foreign ministers' meeting in New Delhi. Chinese state banks are processing PGSA yuan toll payments; China has not commented on its vessels' continued Hormuz passage, but benefits structurally from a non-dollar toll system it did not design.
Iraq (bilateral passage partner)
Iraq (bilateral passage partner)
Baghdad negotiated a 2-million-barrel VLCC transit without paying PGSA yuan tolls, offering political alignment in lieu of cash. Iraq's position inside Iran's adjacent bloc makes it the natural first bilateral partner and a template for how Tehran structures passage deals with states that cannot afford Western coalition membership.
Bahrain and Qatar (Gulf signatories)
Bahrain and Qatar (Gulf signatories)
Both signed the Western coalition paper while hosting US Fifth Fleet and CENTCOM's Al Udeid base, respectively. Qatar occupies the sharpest contradiction: it is on coalition paper while simultaneously receiving LNG passage through the bilateral Iran-Pakistan track, a position Doha has tacitly accepted from both sides.