Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
16MAY

CIA and Mossad hunt for Khamenei

4 min read
12:41UTC

Thirteen days after being named supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei has not appeared in public. Western intelligence agencies cannot confirm he is alive and capable of command.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Western intelligence has no proof of life for Iran's wartime supreme leader after 13 days.

Mojtaba Khamenei has not been seen in public since the Assembly of Experts named him Supreme Leader on 9 March — thirteen days without a video appearance, a voice recording, or a verified photograph. His sole substantive act has been a written Nowruz message, read by a presenter on state television, claiming the "enemy has been defeated" and urging media to "refrain from focusing on weaknesses" . Every Supreme Leader since the Islamic Republic's founding in 1979 has delivered a televised Nowruz address in person . Mojtaba did not.

The CIA, Mossad, and allied intelligence agencies are actively searching for evidence that Khamenei is alive and functioning, Axios reported, citing US and allied officials 1. One US official stated: "We don't think the Iranians would have gone through all this trouble to choose a dead guy as The Supreme Leader, but at the same time, we have no proof that he is taking the helm" 2. A leaked audio recording obtained by The Telegraph — from Mazaher Hosseini, head of protocol for Ali Khamenei's office, speaking at a 12 March meeting — described Mojtaba stepping into his garden moments before ballistic missiles struck his home on 28 February. His wife and son were killed instantly. He survived with a leg injury, by "mere seconds" . Defence Secretary Hegseth subsequently claimed Khamenei is "wounded and likely disfigured." Trump told reporters on 10 March: "We don't know if he's dead or not... A lot of people are saying that he's badly disfigured" . The IDF has publicly named him as an assassination target — Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin stated on camera: "He is not immune. We will pursue him, find him, and neutralise him" .

Iran's constitution vests The Supreme Leader with sole command of all armed forces and sole authority to declare war or accept its end. The Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters — which issued the counter-threat to Trump's 48-hour power-grid ultimatum — reports directly to him. The Diego Garcia missile strike, which revealed a 4,000 km range Iran had publicly denied possessing, required authorisation from the supreme command level. If Khamenei cannot function, Article 111 of the constitution provides for a temporary three-member Leadership Council — the president, the head of the judiciary, and a Guardian Council jurist. This mechanism has never been activated, and its members lack both the IRGC's institutional loyalty and the theological authority The Supreme Leader holds as velayat-e faqih, the guardianship of the Islamic jurist that is the constitutional foundation of the office's power. Any diplomatic off-ramp also requires a counterpart with authority to agree terms — and it is unclear who that counterpart is. Iran is fighting a war in which the individual constitutionally responsible for both prosecuting and ending hostilities has not been verified as functional by any Western or allied intelligence service in thirteen days.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

In Iran's political system, the supreme leader holds authority above the president, parliament, and military. Generals require political authorisation before making decisions that could escalate to full-scale war. Mojtaba Khamenei was named to this role on 9 March — but has not appeared in public, spoken on camera, or issued any verified voice communication since. The CIA and Mossad are actively searching for proof he is alive and functional. This matters operationally: if no one with recognised authority can accept a ceasefire offer or authorise a military stand-down, the machinery for ending this conflict is missing a critical component at precisely the moment Trump's 48-hour ultimatum requires a functional Iranian counterpart.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The absence intersects with Trump's 48-hour ultimatum in a specific operational way. Ultimatums require a responsive counterpart with authority to comply. The US may be delivering demands to an entity that cannot functionally respond. Enforcement then becomes the default outcome: if no one can authorise compliance, the deadline passes regardless of intent — making strike execution structurally more likely independent of US resolve.

Root Causes

Iran's velayat-e faqih system concentrates decision-making in a single individual and provides no constitutional mechanism for managing a temporarily incapacitated leader. The rapid wartime succession — conducted under bombardment, without the usual public legitimation process — created a structural gap between formal title and operational authority. The Assembly of Experts, which theoretically oversees the supreme leader, has no precedent for intervening in a wartime leadership question and no institutional history of asserting such authority.

Escalation

A functioning supreme leader is the only figure in Iran's system who can overrule the IRGC's escalatory preferences. Without visible authorisation, the Khatam al-Anbiya HQ — which issued the civilian infrastructure counter-threat (Event 1) — may be acting with autonomous authority it does not formally possess. Military commanders making escalatory decisions without political oversight is the precise pathway to accidental or unintended escalation that conflict-termination theory identifies as most dangerous.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    IRGC commanders may be making escalatory military decisions without supreme leader authorisation, including the Diego Garcia strike and the civilian infrastructure counter-threat.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Consequence

    The 48-hour ultimatum mechanism is structurally compromised if no Iranian authority can formally receive, evaluate, and respond to it.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    Competing Iranian power centres — IRGC, Foreign Ministry, Assembly of Experts — may issue contradictory signals, making Iranian intentions unreadable to external actors.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Meaning

    The CIA and Mossad's active search for proof of life represents an intelligence priority shift from targeting to verification — confirming leadership uncertainty has become the dominant operational question.

    Short term · Reported
First Reported In

Update #44 · Trump: 48 hours to destroy Iran power grid

Axios· 22 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
CIA and Mossad hunt for Khamenei
Iran's supreme leader is the constitutional commander-in-chief and sole authority on war-and-peace decisions. His unverified status during active hostilities raises direct questions about who is authorising Iranian military operations — including the Diego Garcia missile strike and the counter-threat to Trump's power-grid ultimatum — and who possesses the authority to negotiate an end to the war.
Different Perspectives
India (BRICS meeting host, grey-market beneficiary)
India (BRICS meeting host, grey-market beneficiary)
New Delhi hosted the BRICS foreign ministers' meeting on 14 May that Araghchi attended under the Minab168 designation, giving India a front-row seat to Iran's diplomatic positioning. India's state refiners have been absorbing discounted Iranian crude through grey-market routing since April; Brent at $109.30 means every barrel sourced outside the formal market generates a structural saving.
Hengaw / Kurdish human rights monitors
Hengaw / Kurdish human rights monitors
Hengaw's daily reports from Iran's Kurdish provinces remain the sole independent cross-check on Iran's judicial activity during the conflict. Two executions across Qom and Karaj Central prisons on 15 May and five Kurdish detentions on 15-16 May indicate the wartime judicial pipeline is operating independently of military tempo.
Pakistan (mediator and bilateral partner)
Pakistan (mediator and bilateral partner)
Islamabad spent its diplomatic capital as the US-Iran MOU carrier to secure LNG passage for two Qatari vessels through a bilateral Pakistan-Iran agreement, spending its mediation credit for direct economic gain. China's public endorsement of Pakistan's mediatory role on 13 May is the structural reward.
China and BRICS bloc
China and BRICS bloc
Beijing endorsed Pakistan's mediatory role on 13 May, one day after the BRICS foreign ministers' meeting in New Delhi. Chinese state banks are processing PGSA yuan toll payments; China has not commented on its vessels' continued Hormuz passage, but benefits structurally from a non-dollar toll system it did not design.
Iraq (bilateral passage partner)
Iraq (bilateral passage partner)
Baghdad negotiated a 2-million-barrel VLCC transit without paying PGSA yuan tolls, offering political alignment in lieu of cash. Iraq's position inside Iran's adjacent bloc makes it the natural first bilateral partner and a template for how Tehran structures passage deals with states that cannot afford Western coalition membership.
Bahrain and Qatar (Gulf signatories)
Bahrain and Qatar (Gulf signatories)
Both signed the Western coalition paper while hosting US Fifth Fleet and CENTCOM's Al Udeid base, respectively. Qatar occupies the sharpest contradiction: it is on coalition paper while simultaneously receiving LNG passage through the bilateral Iran-Pakistan track, a position Doha has tacitly accepted from both sides.