Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
9MAY

NWF liquid share heads for $12.5bn

3 min read
17:21UTC

Reshetnikov projected the National Wealth Fund's liquid share could fall to roughly $12.5 billion by year-end, a quarter of its 1 February value; a Communist Duma member publicly invoked '1917'.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Russia's reserve cushion is on track to thin to two months of war-cost overrun by year-end.

Russian Economic Development Minister Maxim Reshetnikov told a closed Moscow audience on 28 April that, at current oil prices and ruble rate, the National Wealth Fund (NWF)'s liquid share could fall to approximately $12.5 billion by year-end 2026, roughly a quarter of its 1 February 2026 value. The NWF is Russia's sovereign wealth fund and the principal instrument for absorbing budget shortfalls without raising taxes or printing money.

Reshetnikov's quantification follows his 17 April admission that the reserves are largely exhausted . The earlier statement framed depletion as a present condition; the 28 April projection puts a Q4 figure on the trajectory. A Communist Party State Duma member then invoked '1917' on the chamber floor, a reference to the fiscal collapse that preceded the Romanov abdication. Russia's managed political system tolerates Communist Party criticism as system-supportive opposition; the reference passing without rebuke means the fiscal frame has crossed from technocratic memo language into permitted political vocabulary.

The NWF's design assumed oil prices high enough to refill the fund while it was spent. Oil revenues fell roughly 30% year-on-year through Q1 2026 against the 2022 invasion peak, refinery throughput is at a 16-year low (covered separately in this briefing), and Treasury's GL 134B preserves at-sea cargo flow only through 16 May. The NWF is being drawn down in a quarter when the reasons to draw it down are accumulating rather than fading.

$12.5 billion is roughly two months of Russian wartime budget overrun. Once the liquid share is exhausted, Moscow's options narrow to ruble emission, tax rises on a sanctioned export base, or public spending cuts inside a war economy. Each of those was politically untouchable a year ago; the 1917 reference signals that condition is no longer holding.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Russia has a national savings fund called the National Wealth Fund, set up in 2008 to accumulate oil revenues and deploy them during economic downturns or budget shortfalls. Russia's Economics Minister Maxim Reshetnikov said that at the current rate of spending, the fund's liquid (easily accessible) share could fall to about $12.5 billion by the end of 2026, roughly a quarter of what it held in February 2026. To put that in context, Russia is spending that fund to help pay for the war. A Communist Party member in Russia's parliament publicly referenced the year 1917, when the Russian government collapsed under financial strain, as a comparison point. That kind of public statement from a Duma member is unusual in Russia's controlled political environment.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The NWF depletion has a specific structural cause that Reshetnikov's projection does not name explicitly: the fund was designed as a counter-cyclical buffer for oil-revenue volatility, not as a war-fighting reserve. Between 2022 and 2025 Russia spent approximately $65 billion in NWF liquid assets on military procurement and budget supplementation.

The fund was never recapitalised because Urals crude remained below the $60/bbl fund-replenishment threshold for most of 2022-2024; the Iran war's price spike in early 2026 came too late to rebuild a meaningfully large buffer before the Q1 oil tax revenue halved year-on-year.

The second structural cause is the VAT increase from 20% to 22% that took effect in January 2026. That change was designed to offset oil revenue shortfalls but has fed directly into domestic consumer price inflation, reducing real household purchasing power and compressing the government's political space to maintain both military spending and social transfer commitments simultaneously.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    NWF liquid share falling to $12.5 billion removes Moscow's primary non-debt fiscal buffer; any shock to oil prices below the budget breakeven forces the government to either cut military spending or issue domestic debt at war-elevated interest rates.

    Medium term · 0.78
  • Risk

    If Reshetnikov's projection is a managed disclosure to build political support for a ceasefire rather than an accurate internal forecast, the 16 May GL 134B crude cliff becomes a negotiating pressure point the Kremlin will need to address before it bites.

    Short term · 0.62
  • Consequence

    The Communist Duma member's public '1917' reference, entering the parliamentary record, gives Russian opposition and protest movements a domestically-sourced fiscal accountability narrative that is harder for the Kremlin to suppress than external reporting.

    Medium term · 0.7
First Reported In

Update #15 · Hardware-free parade; crude waiver lives on

Mediazona / BBC News Russian· 3 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
India (BRICS chair / S. Jaishankar)
India (BRICS chair / S. Jaishankar)
India's BRICS chair draft communique frames the Iran conflict as a matter of 'safe, unimpeded maritime flows', a formula explicitly neutral on Iran's 'no obstacles' claim and short of endorsing IRGC maritime doctrine. Delhi has maintained separate tracks: a demarche on Iranian tanker firings at Indian-crewed vessels, silence on OFAC designations naming Indian firms.
International Energy Agency
International Energy Agency
The IEA's May 2026 Oil Market Report quantified the closure at 14.4 million barrels per day shut in, more than one billion barrels of cumulative supply loss, and a 246-million-barrel inventory draw in eight weeks, five times the monthly rate of the 2022 SPR release. The IEA projects a deficit through Q4 2026 even if Hormuz reopens in June.
Pakistan (mediating channel)
Pakistan (mediating channel)
Pakistan's intermediary channel between Washington and Tehran remains active despite Trump's 'totally unacceptable' rebuff of Iran's 10-point MOU reply on 11 May. Islamabad carries the only direct US-Iran track and the only channel with both civilian and military buy-in on the Iranian side, but has not convened a second Islamabad round.
Mojtaba Khamenei / IRIB
Mojtaba Khamenei / IRIB
Iran's state broadcaster reported on 14 May that the Supreme Leader has issued 'new and decisive directives' for military operations, the first such signal since the war began. Mojtaba has not appeared publicly since 28 February; the directives are paper instruments, not verbal statements.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Beijing's official summit readout mentioned 'the Middle East situation' alongside the Ukraine crisis and the Korean Peninsula, without naming Iran or specifying any Iranian commitment. Chinese state media has not published the three red lines Trump described.
White House / Trump administration
White House / Trump administration
Trump told Fox News from Beijing that Xi had committed to three Iran red lines: no nuclear weapon, an open Hormuz, no military equipment supplied to Tehran. He described the summit as 'a big statement'. The White House issued its own readout confirming those commitments; the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs readout did not.