18APR

Tehran's first quiet morning in 37 years

3 min read

14:57UTC

Residents described the city as 'quiet' on Saturday — the first morning in 37 years without a Supreme Leader, and the first after a night of airstrikes on the capital's administrative core.

← Back to Hormuz opens and closes in 24 hours Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictDeveloping

Key takeaway

Tehran's eerie quiet on the first morning without a Supreme Leader in 37 years reflects the intersection of genuine shock, communications blackout, and the uncertainty of a succession process being conducted under active bombardment.

Residents described Tehran as "quiet" on Saturday morning — the first in 37 years without a Supreme Leader. Ali Khamenei assumed the position in June 1989, two months after Ruhollah Khomeini's death. His killing in an Israeli airstrike on his compound , confirmed by Iranian state media, removed the figure who had shaped the Islamic Republic's political, military, and ideological direction for nearly four decades. Every Iranian under 40 has known no other supreme authority.

The quiet carries multiple explanations, none mutually exclusive. Iran's National Security Council had advised residents to leave Tehran . Israeli strikes had expanded into central Tehran the previous night, hitting near police headquarters and state television facilities . Supermarkets in northern Tehran had already run out of bread, eggs, water, and milk . For many residents, departure was the rational response. The "quiet" may be the sound of a city substantially emptied rather than a city at peace.

For those who remained, Saturday morning arrived in an information vacuum. With internet connectivity at 1% of normal, residents could not access news, contact family outside the city, or learn whether the strikes had ended or merely paused. IRGC personnel on motorbikes had been observed displaying weapons to intimidate residents (ID:9). The celebrations that erupted in Tehran on the night of Khamenei's death — fireworks, chanting, public joy (ID:474) — had either subsided or been suppressed. The gap between Friday night's visible emotion and Saturday morning's reported stillness suggests a population recalibrating between relief, fear, and the practical question of survival under bombardment.

The three-person interim council named under Article 111 had not yet addressed the public. The Assembly of Experts — the 88-member clerical body constitutionally tasked with selecting a new Supreme Leader — cannot convene because its Tehran headquarters was destroyed in the strikes . No constitutional provision exists for the simultaneous loss of The Supreme Leader and the body that selects his successor. Tehran's quiet is the silence of a political system whose centre has been destroyed, with no mechanism yet identified to reconstitute it.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

For 37 years, Ayatollah Khamenei was not merely a head of state — he was the theological and political anchor of the entire Iranian system of government. The principle of Velayat-e Faqih (guardianship of the Islamic jurist) holds that a supreme cleric's authority supersedes that of elected officials. Every major Iranian institution — the Revolutionary Guard, the judiciary, state media, the nuclear programme — ultimately reported to him. His death does not just create a political vacancy; it creates a constitutional and theological crisis about who holds ultimate authority while a successor is chosen. The 'quiet' in Tehran could mean many things: people are too frightened to go out, too stunned to process events, too cut off from information to know what is happening, or simply waiting to see who emerges with authority before acting.

Deep Analysis

Synthesis

The quiet in Tehran is one of the most analytically significant data points in this crisis, precisely because it is ambiguous. It could be read as legitimacy collapse — a population that has already internalised the end of the Islamic Republic and is waiting for confirmation — or as the temporary effect of information suppression. The Iranian government's decision to maintain the blackout suggests it fears the population is not quiescent but is being prevented from acting. The first morning without Khamenei will be studied as a historical inflection point regardless of what follows. Whether it is remembered as the beginning of a democratic transition, a factional civil war, or an authoritarian reconsolidation depends entirely on decisions being made in the next 72 hours.

Root Causes

The quiet is a product of compounding shocks: the assassination of the Supreme Leader, 48 hours of near-total communications blackout, active foreign bombardment, and the unprecedented nature of a constitutional succession crisis during wartime. There is no playbook for this. The Article 111 succession process was designed for a peaceful transition; it has never been stress-tested against simultaneous external military attack and domestic uprising. The Iranian population is, in effect, experiencing multiple regime-altering events simultaneously while cut off from the information needed to understand or respond to any of them.

Escalation

The quiet is fragile and its direction is unresolved. It could represent the calm before organised resistance, the numbness of a population absorbing simultaneous shocks, or the effective suppression of communication preventing any collective action from forming. The key variable is whether the Assembly of Experts can convene and reach consensus under wartime conditions — an outcome whose probability is genuinely uncertain. Each day that passes without a credible successor announcement deepens the political vacuum, as competing factions within the IRGC, the clerical establishment, and the reformist movement position for influence. A quiet Tehran today does not predict a quiet Tehran tomorrow.

What could happen next?

Risk
A prolonged succession vacuum could fracture IRGC command authority, enabling factional actors to take independent military or political actions that neither a successor government nor external parties can predict or contain.
Immediate · Assessed
Meaning
The absence of public reaction in Tehran — positive or negative — reflects the success of the communications blackout in preventing collective action formation, not necessarily genuine popular acquiescence.
Immediate · Assessed
Consequence
The constitutional process under Article 111 will require the Assembly of Experts to convene under active bombardment, a process that could be disrupted by strikes, travel restrictions, or internal factional disagreement.
Short term · Assessed
Precedent
The first successful assassination of a sitting Supreme Leader establishes that such figures are not untouchable, potentially reshaping deterrence calculations for other theocratic and personalised authoritarian regimes.
Long term · Suggested

Source Landscape

This story draws on centre-left-leaning sources from Qatar

Qatar

Iran has been without a Supreme Leader only once before in the Islamic Republic's history: the transition between Khomeini's death in June 1989 and the formal election of Khamenei, a period managed under prepared succession protocols. That transition occurred without external military pressure, with intact communications infrastructure, and with a functioning Assembly of Experts.

The current situation shares none of those conditions.

Why it’s relevant now

The 1989 precedent is instructive precisely because it succeeded under optimal conditions; the absence of those conditions now makes the 'quiet' in Tehran as likely to reflect paralysis and information suppression as genuine calm.

Scholars of authoritarian resilience at the Brookings Institution and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute have noted that the critical variable in succession crises is whether the security apparatus remains unified in the immediate aftermath. The IRGC's loyalty is to the position of Supreme Leader and the Islamic Republic as a system, not to any individual — but the absence of a named successor creates a window of fractured command authority.

Karim Sadjadpour of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has argued that Iran's political system is brittle precisely because of its centralisation around a single figure; Khamenei's removal tests that thesis directly.

Sources:Al Jazeera

Mentions:Qom →Assembly of Experts →Karim Sadjadpour →National Security Council (Iran) →United Nations Security Council (UNSC) →Iran →Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) →Tehran →Ali Khamenei →Article 111 →

First Reported In

Update #6 · Pentagon produced no evidence for Iran war

Al Jazeera· 1 Mar 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Iran confirms Khamenei killed by Israel

Tehran's quiet morning described as first in 37 years without a Supreme Leader following Khamenei's killing

Occurred 1 Mar 2026

Read story →

This Event

Tehran's first quiet morning in 37 years

The reported quiet in Tehran reflects a population caught between the collapse of the old political order, active military bombardment, and mass civilian departure — a city suspended between the system that has ended and whatever replaces it.

Different Perspectives

Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)

Neutrality was possible when the targets were military. 148 dead schoolgirls made it impossible — no government can explain that away to its own citizens.

Trump administration

Oscillating between claiming diplomatic progress and threatening escalation, while deploying additional ground forces to the Gulf.

Israeli security establishment

Fears a rapid, vague US-Iran agreement that freezes military operations before the IDF achieves what it considers full strategic objectives. A senior military official assessed the campaign is 'halfway there' and needs several more weeks.

Iraqi government

Iraq's force majeure is the position of a non-belligerent whose entire petroleum economy has been paralysed by a war between others — storage full, exports blocked, production being cut with no timeline for resumption.

Russia — Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia

Moscow calibrated its position between Gulf states and Iran: abstaining on Resolution 2817 rather than vetoing it, signalling it would not block protection for Gulf states, while refusing to endorse a text that ignores the US-Israeli campaign it regards as the conflict's proximate cause. Russia proposed its own ceasefire text — which failed 4-2-9 — allowing Moscow to claim the peacemaker role while providing Iran with satellite targeting intelligence, a duality consistent with its approach in Syria.

France — President Macron

France absorbed its first combat death in a conflict it has publicly declined to join. The killing of Chief Warrant Officer Frion in Erbil forces Macron to choose between escalating involvement and accepting casualties from the margins.