Skip to content
Iran Conflict 2026
18APR

Assembly schedules vote for Mojtaba

3 min read
14:57UTC

The Assembly of Experts moved its emergency session to announce Mojtaba Khamenei to a website and a shrine — after Israel destroyed the building where it last voted.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Conducting the succession online from a shrine rather than in a formal institutional venue confirms that Israeli targeting has partially achieved its strategic objective of disrupting the succession process, even if it has not halted it.

Iran International reported that the Assembly of Experts scheduled an emergency online session for 5 March to formally announce Mojtaba Khamenei as Supreme Leader, accelerating from the "next week" timeline reported earlier Wednesday. The session is being held from a location near the Fatima Masumeh shrine in Qom — one of Shia Islam's holiest sites, chosen to lend religious gravity to a succession that lacks it on clerical terms, and because Israel struck the Assembly's Qom headquarters during the succession vote earlier this week , killing or wounding multiple members.

The Assembly had already confirmed Mojtaba as successor , but that vote occurred under contested circumstances. Whether it took place before the Israeli strike on the headquarters, in its aftermath, or in a dispersed emergency session remains unclear and cannot be independently verified during Iran's internet blackout, now in its sixth day . Iranian state media described the selection as "divine will." The formal announcement session is intended to provide the public legitimacy that the initial vote, conducted under fire, could not deliver.

At least eight Assembly members plan to boycott, citing "heavy pressure" from the IRGC. Their objection is substantive: Mojtaba, 56, does not hold marja ("source of emulation") status — the highest rank in Shia clerical hierarchy. Article 109 of the Islamic Republic's constitution requires The Supreme Leader to possess senior jurisprudential scholarship. His father faced a similar objection when elevated from hojatoleslam in 1989; the clerical establishment resolved it by retroactively upgrading Khamenei's rank, a manoeuvre critics called political rather than scholarly. Mojtaba's credentials are thinner still. His power base is the IRGC and Basij, not the seminaries of Qom.

The earlier plan to delay the announcement — linked to postponement of Ali Khamenei's burial and security concerns about any public ceremony presenting a targeting opportunity — has been overridden. The IRGC's calculation appears to be that a state at war without a formally announced head of state is more vulnerable than one with a contested leader. Iran has now restructured its military into 31 autonomous commands and is attempting to formalise its supreme political authority — both under active bombardment, both improvised responses to Israeli strikes designed to decapitate the chain of command. From exile, Reza Pahlavi — the late Shah's son — stated that whoever is announced "will lack legitimacy and will be considered an accomplice to the bloody record" of the Islamic Republic, a framing aimed at the internal Iranian audience the internet blackout is designed to isolate.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran is choosing its most powerful leader — the Supreme Leader sits above the president and controls the military, judiciary, and state media — but instead of a formal ceremony in their parliament building (which was bombed), they are doing it online from near a holy site, rushed to prevent further attacks. The person being chosen (Mojtaba Khamenei) is the current leader's son, which is politically awkward in a system that claims to reject dynastic rule and requires the leader to be a qualified Islamic scholar — a qualification he is widely considered to lack.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The dispersed, covert session reveals that Israel's targeting strategy has achieved a secondary effect the body does not articulate: it has transformed Iran's most consequential institutional act into an underground process, reducing its religious and procedural defensibility precisely when maximum legitimacy is needed to govern through a wartime crisis.

Root Causes

Iran's constitution requires the Supreme Leader to be a qualified Islamic jurist (faqih); Mojtaba lacks this standing. The IRGC's willingness to coerce the Assembly reflects a decade-long structural shift in which the Guards' economic interests — estimated at 20–30% of Iran's GDP through affiliated conglomerates — have made them the dominant institutional power, with the theological rationale for the system increasingly subordinate to their security calculus.

Escalation

The acceleration signals the IRGC and regime inner circle want Mojtaba formally installed before either a ceasefire negotiation or continued military pressure removes their ability to control the outcome — suggesting the regime expects the conflict to continue long enough to make the succession a live variable in any talks.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    A Supreme Leader installed through a coerced, boycotted, digitally-conducted session will face persistent internal legitimacy challenges that make governance dependent on IRGC enforcement rather than clerical authority.

    Medium term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Conducting a constitutional process online under targeting pressure establishes that Iranian state institutions can be physically dispersed and degraded by external military action — a capability demonstration that will inform future Israeli and US targeting doctrine.

    Long term · Suggested
  • Risk

    A legitimacy-challenged new Supreme Leader may pursue aggressive military postures in the short term to consolidate authority and demonstrate strength to the IRGC constituency that installed him.

    Short term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #22 · IRGC drones hit Azerbaijan; CIA link cut

Iran International· 5 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Assembly schedules vote for Mojtaba
The acceleration of Mojtaba's formal announcement — conducted online, relocated for security, and facing an eight-member boycott — reflects the IRGC's judgement that establishing leadership continuity during active bombardment outweighs the legitimacy costs of a contested, hurried process.
Different Perspectives
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Neutrality was possible when the targets were military. 148 dead schoolgirls made it impossible — no government can explain that away to its own citizens.
Trump administration
Trump administration
Oscillating between claiming diplomatic progress and threatening escalation, while deploying additional ground forces to the Gulf.
Pakistan government
Pakistan government
Positioning as indispensable mediator by confirming indirect talks, but unable to bridge the substantive gap between both sides' incompatible demands.
European Union
European Union
The EU rejected Trump's Hormuz toll joint-venture on 12 April citing UNCLOS, provided the legal ground for the 8 April Élysée statement, and the Paris conference agenda now includes European financial sanctions on Iran if Hormuz remains closed. Brussels is both the legal architecture behind Europe's Hormuz position and a potential independent sanctions actor converging on the US pressure track.
Gulf states (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain)
Gulf states (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain)
Absorbing daily Iranian missile and drone attacks, discovering Hezbollah assassination networks within their borders, and relying entirely on their own air defences with no functioning diplomatic channel to Tehran.
United States government
United States government
Trump described operations as 'extremely ahead of schedule' and said Iran's leaders are 'begging to make a deal.' The administration is working to arrange a Vance visit to Islamabad while declining to respond publicly to Kallas's call to confront Russia.