Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
3APR

IDF Kills Iran Ballistic Missile Commander in Kermanshah

2 min read
11:45UTC

The IDF killed Makram Atimi, commander of Iran's central ballistic missile unit, in a strike on Kermanshah on 3 April. Several battalion commanders died alongside him.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Atimi's death decapitates Iran's central missile command, but the barrages have not stopped.

The IDF struck Kermanshah on 3 April, killing Makram Atimi, commander of Iran's central ballistic missile unit, along with several battalion commanders. The strike was a targeted decapitation of the IRGC command layer responsible for coordinating Iran's longest-range missile operations.

The killing is the latest in a sustained Israeli campaign against Iran's missile command structure. CENTCOM reported over 12,300 targets struck across the campaign , yet the ballistic missile programme has continued operating. The UAE's cumulative intercept totals , 457 ballistic missiles as of 3 April , confirm the barrages have not stopped.

That paradox is central to assessing what Atimi's death means. Removing a commander disrupts coordination and degrades institutional knowledge. It does not destroy the missiles he commanded, the operators who fire them, or the targeting data already in the system. RUSI assessed that Israeli Arrow-3 stocks were nearing exhaustion at current expenditure rates ; the demand on those batteries has not meaningfully eased despite earlier command-layer strikes.

The Kermanshah strike also reinforces the geographic reach of Israeli operations inside Iran. Kermanshah sits 525 kilometres from Tel Aviv. Precision strikes at that range against a named commander represent a level of targeting intelligence that Iran has consistently failed to anticipate.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The Israeli military killed the Iranian general in charge of directing ballistic missile attacks. This does not stop Iran from firing missiles — the weapons still exist — but it makes it harder to coordinate where and when to fire them effectively.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The IDF's targeting of Iranian missile command reflects Israeli strategic logic that is distinct from US campaign objectives: Israel's priority is preventing Iranian ballistic missiles from reaching Israeli territory, which requires degrading the command-and-control layer, not merely depleting inventory.

Atimi's killing is also part of a broader IDF operation to exploit the intelligence windfall from Iranian communications disrupted since Day 1 of the conflict. The window for high-value targeting is time-limited as Iran adapts its communications security.

Escalation

Moderately escalatory within a campaign that has already normalised senior officer targeting. The strike is consistent with the existing IDF operational pattern. Iran's response is likely absorbed into its existing missile campaign tempo rather than triggering a separate escalatory act.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Iran's central missile command node faces a 2-4 week coordination degradation as deputies assume command and rebuild internal communications.

    Immediate · Medium
  • Risk

    Degraded command coordination increases the probability of missile targeting errors, including strikes on unintended civilian or neutral targets.

    Short term · Medium
  • Meaning

    The IDF continues to pursue its own targeting agenda in parallel to CENTCOM operations, creating a de facto two-track campaign with different strategic objectives.

    Immediate · High
First Reported In

Update #57 · Bridge strike kills eight; Army chief fired

US Central Command· 3 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Gulf shipping and insurance markets
Gulf shipping and insurance markets
With Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb both hostile at once, war-risk underwriters face their first dual-chokepoint pricing problem; the rerouting hedge that absorbed one closure is gone for Israeli-linked hulls. Any deal that reopens Hormuz without a Houthi stand-down clause delivers only partial shipping relief.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Russia and China met IAEA chief Grossi jointly in Geneva on 5 June to coordinate an advance blocking position against Washington's censure resolution, the first documented instance of proactive pre-session obstruction rather than reactive post-vote dissent. Beijing's move came four days after OFAC designated Shanghai Qianye Energy under Iran energy sanctions.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia was left out of the emergency $4.01 billion Patriot waiver Qatar received on 2 May as its own PAC-3 stocks ran near-empty from intercepting Iranian salvoes over Aramco facilities. Riyadh is on a standard 18-month FMS queue behind a production line booked through 2030, with no equivalent priority to Qatar's Al Udeid basing role.
Houthis (Ansar Allah)
Houthis (Ansar Allah)
The Houthis declared a complete ban on Israeli Red Sea navigation on 8 June and struck Jaffa, their first attack on Israeli territory since April, seven days after the Tasnim authorisation to activate other fronts including Bab el-Mandeb. The declaration put both chokepoints under hostile authority simultaneously.
Iran
Iran
Iran agreed the 9 June mutual halt after the Mahshahr exchange and coordinated with Russia and China to block Washington's IAEA censure resolution, using the Board as a second front while the bilateral pause held on the military one. Tehran's acceptance of the Lebanon carve-out contradicts the linkage position it stated on 1 June.
Benjamin Netanyahu and the IDF
Benjamin Netanyahu and the IDF
Israel struck the Karun Petrochemical plant at Mahshahr on 8 June over Trump's explicit objection, then agreed a halt with Iran the following day scoped on Israeli terms with Lebanon carved out. Netanyahu's posture is that the IDF will not accept Iranian missile factories as off-limits regardless of US diplomatic timelines.