Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
22MAR

A-10s and Apaches hunt Hormuz fast boats

4 min read
05:50UTC

The A-10 Warthog has dodged retirement for a decade. Its low-altitude deployment over the Strait of Hormuz is an assessment CENTCOM has not made verbally — that Iran's southern coastal defences can no longer threaten slow-moving aircraft.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

A-10 deployment signals US air superiority over Iran's littoral — one shootdown publicly disproves it.

A-10 Warthog ground-attack aircraft and AH-64 Apache helicopters are flying low-altitude combat patrols over the strait of Hormuz, hunting Iranian fast-attack craft and intercepting drones 1. The A-10 has a maximum speed of roughly 700 km/h, carries no stealth profile, and was designed in the 1970s to destroy Soviet armour columns on the North German Plain. The Apache is a terrain-following attack helicopter built to engage ground targets from behind ridgelines. Neither platform belongs in airspace where functioning surface-to-air missile batteries or coastal anti-aircraft systems remain operational.

Their presence over the strait is an operational assessment CENTCOM has not stated in words. Commanders would not commit these aircraft — among the most vulnerable in the US inventory to ground-based air defences — if Iran's southern littoral missile and anti-aircraft network were still capable of engaging low-altitude targets. The supporting evidence is specific. CENTCOM confirmed it used GBU-72 5,000-pound penetrator munitions against hardened coastal anti-ship missile sites along the Hormuz shoreline . More than 130 Iranian naval vessels have been destroyed in 22 days — a pace Adm. Brad Cooper called the largest naval attrition campaign since the Second World War 2. The target count has risen from 7,000 to more than 8,000 in days , with 8,000-plus combat sorties flown across the 22-day campaign 3.

Iran's IRGC Navy built its Hormuz doctrine around asymmetric swarm tactics: hundreds of small, fast fibreglass boats armed with anti-ship missiles and rocket-propelled grenades, dispersed across coastal inlets along Iran's 1,100 km southern shoreline. The strategy assumed the US would send capital ships into the strait's confined waters, where speed and numbers could offset technological disadvantage. Instead, CENTCOM appears to have systematically destroyed coastal infrastructure from the air before committing low-altitude platforms for the close-in fight. The A-10's GAU-8 Avenger — a 30mm rotary cannon firing up to 3,900 rounds per minute of depleted-uranium armour-piercing ammunition — was designed to penetrate tank hulls. Against unarmoured fast boats at close range, it does not need to. The US Air Force has tried to retire the A-10 at least five times since 2014; Congress blocked each attempt 4. Its return to combat in a maritime interdiction role its designers never envisaged is a function of two things: the IRGC Navy's degradation and the particular match between the A-10's low-speed manoeuvrability and the targets that remain.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The A-10 'Warthog' and Apache helicopter were built for one specific job: flying slowly at low altitude to destroy tanks and support ground troops. They were not designed for airspace where the enemy still has working anti-aircraft missiles — they are too slow and fly too low to survive that environment. Flying these aircraft over the Strait of Hormuz sends a deliberate signal: US commanders believe Iran's ability to shoot down aircraft in that area has been sufficiently destroyed. If that assessment is correct, the A-10s can effectively hunt and destroy Iran's small fast-attack boats before they threaten shipping. If it is wrong — if even a handful of shoulder-fired missiles or naval guns survive — these slow aircraft are highly vulnerable. The US has not formally declared air superiority over the Strait; the deployment is the evidence for the inference.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The inter-service dimension is analytically significant and absent from the body. Army Apaches and Air Force A-10s are solving a problem the Navy's force design created by never developing dedicated counter-IRGCN platforms. This reveals that Iran's anti-access investment — dispersed fast-attack craft, mines, and shore-based missiles — successfully exploited a structural gap in US force planning that blue-water naval doctrine consistently underweighted.

Root Causes

The US Navy's surface combatants were not designed to counter IRGCN swarming tactics at scale. The resort to A-10s and Apaches reflects a force-design gap: decades of US naval procurement optimised for blue-water peer competition and cruise-missile strike, systematically underweighting the close-range, high-density small-vessel threat Iran spent decades building as its primary anti-access strategy.

Escalation

The public deployment of slow, low-altitude platforms is itself an escalatory provocation — it dares Iran to contest air superiority by engaging them. A successful Iranian shootdown would publicly disprove US air superiority claims and create immediate political pressure to escalate or reposition, potentially broadening the conflict's geographic scope.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    US commanders have assessed Iranian air defences over the southern Hormuz littoral as sufficiently degraded to commit slow, low-altitude platforms to the theatre.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Risk

    A single A-10 or Apache shootdown would publicly disprove US air superiority claims, triggering political pressure to escalate or withdraw low-altitude assets.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Effective A-10/Apache interdiction of fast-attack craft is the practical precondition for insurance market reopening of Hormuz war-risk coverage.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Deploying legacy close-air-support platforms in a naval littoral role establishes doctrine for future peer-adjacent conflicts involving swarming small-vessel threats.

    Long term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #44 · Trump: 48 hours to destroy Iran power grid

Jane's· 22 Mar 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Hizballah
Hizballah
Has not commented on the US Treasury's 20 August designation of ten people, including named couriers, over a cash network Treasury says moved money to it from the IRGC-Qods Force. ACLED recorded a sharp rise in attacks around it the same day.
Kuwait
Kuwait
Kuwait's Chief of the General Staff, Lieutenant General Khaled al-Shriaan, co-chaired the 16th US-Kuwait Joint Military Commission at the Pentagon on 21 August. Kuwait has not published what was agreed; only a summary of the meeting's existence and attendees is sourced.
Qatar
Qatar
Has not commented publicly on the $4.5bn KC-46A tanker Foreign Military Sale notification the State Department approved on 20 August. The notification opens a sale process; Doha has not confirmed whether it will proceed to a signed transfer.
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf
Told a Baghdad business meeting on 20 August that Iran will not endure a hungry population regardless of its military strength, against 87.9% point-to-point inflation and 128.1% food inflation for Tir. His fellow Majlis Economic Committee member Samsami separately warned a petrol price rise would ignite unrest.
US Navy
US Navy
Signed a $22.9bn, seven-year contract with Raytheon on 17 August to raise Tomahawk output from about 60 a year to more than 1,000. The Acting Navy Secretary, quoted via an X post, framed it as the "Arsenal of Freedom" initiative; it replaces the 850 missiles fired by 1 April in about ten months at the new rate.
UK Maritime Trade Operations
UK Maritime Trade Operations
UKMTO logged six armed men boarding a tanker 136 nautical miles east of Al Mukalla on 20 August and redirecting it toward Somalia. A vessel steered toward the Somali coast reads as an attempted seizure, a distinct hazard from the stand-off strikes the same lane has seen before.