Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Iran Conflict 2026
22MAR

A-10s and Apaches hunt Hormuz fast boats

4 min read
05:50UTC

The A-10 Warthog has dodged retirement for a decade. Its low-altitude deployment over the Strait of Hormuz is an assessment CENTCOM has not made verbally — that Iran's southern coastal defences can no longer threaten slow-moving aircraft.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

A-10 deployment signals US air superiority over Iran's littoral — one shootdown publicly disproves it.

A-10 Warthog ground-attack aircraft and AH-64 Apache helicopters are flying low-altitude combat patrols over the strait of Hormuz, hunting Iranian fast-attack craft and intercepting drones⁠1. The A-10 has a maximum speed of roughly 700 km/h, carries no stealth profile, and was designed in the 1970s to destroy Soviet armour columns on the North German Plain. The Apache is a terrain-following attack helicopter built to engage ground targets from behind ridgelines. Neither platform belongs in airspace where functioning surface-to-air missile batteries or coastal anti-aircraft systems remain operational.

Their presence over the strait is an operational assessment CENTCOM has not stated in words. Commanders would not commit these aircraft — among the most vulnerable in the US inventory to ground-based air defences — if Iran's southern littoral missile and anti-aircraft network were still capable of engaging low-altitude targets. The supporting evidence is specific. CENTCOM confirmed it used GBU-72 5,000-pound penetrator munitions against hardened coastal anti-ship missile sites along the Hormuz shoreline. More than 130 Iranian naval vessels have been destroyed in 22 days — a pace Adm. Brad Cooper called the largest naval attrition campaign since The Second World War⁠2. The target count has risen from 7,000 to more than 8,000 in days, with 8,000-plus combat sorties flown across the 22-day campaign⁠3.

Iran's IRGC Navy built its Hormuz doctrine around asymmetric swarm tactics: hundreds of small, fast fibreglass boats armed with anti-ship missiles and rocket-propelled grenades, dispersed across coastal inlets along Iran's 1,100 km southern shoreline. The strategy assumed the US would send capital ships into the strait's confined waters, where speed and numbers could offset technological disadvantage. Instead, CENTCOM appears to have systematically destroyed coastal infrastructure from the air before committing low-altitude platforms for the close-in fight. The A-10's GAU-8 Avenger — a 30mm rotary cannon firing up to 3,900 rounds per minute of depleted-uranium armour-piercing ammunition — was designed to penetrate tank hulls. Against unarmoured fast boats at close range, it does not need to. The US Air Force has tried to retire the A-10 at least five times since 2014; Congress blocked each attempt⁠4. Its return to combat in a maritime interdiction role its designers never envisaged is a function of two things: the IRGC Navy's degradation and the particular match between the A-10's low-speed manoeuvrability and the targets that remain.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The A-10 'Warthog' and Apache helicopter were built for one specific job: flying slowly at low altitude to destroy tanks and support ground troops. They were not designed for airspace where the enemy still has working anti-aircraft missiles — they are too slow and fly too low to survive that environment. Flying these aircraft over the strait of Hormuz sends a deliberate signal: US commanders believe Iran's ability to shoot down aircraft in that area has been sufficiently destroyed. If that assessment is correct, the A-10s can effectively hunt and destroy Iran's small fast-attack boats before they threaten shipping. If it is wrong — if even a handful of shoulder-fired missiles or naval guns survive — these slow aircraft are highly vulnerable. The US has not formally declared air superiority over the strait; the deployment is the evidence for the inference.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The inter-service dimension is analytically significant and absent from the body. Army Apaches and Air Force A-10s are solving a problem the Navy's force design created by never developing dedicated counter-IRGCN platforms. This reveals that Iran's anti-access investment — dispersed fast-attack craft, mines, and shore-based missiles — successfully exploited a structural gap in US force planning that blue-water naval doctrine consistently underweighted.

Root Causes

The US Navy's surface combatants were not designed to counter IRGCN swarming tactics at scale. The resort to A-10s and Apaches reflects a force-design gap: decades of US naval procurement optimised for blue-water peer competition and cruise-missile strike, systematically underweighting the close-range, high-density small-vessel threat Iran spent decades building as its primary anti-access strategy.

Escalation

The public deployment of slow, low-altitude platforms is itself an escalatory provocation — it dares Iran to contest air superiority by engaging them. A successful Iranian shootdown would publicly disprove US air superiority claims and create immediate political pressure to escalate or reposition, potentially broadening the conflict's geographic scope.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    US commanders have assessed Iranian air defences over the southern Hormuz littoral as sufficiently degraded to commit slow, low-altitude platforms to the theatre.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Risk

    A single A-10 or Apache shootdown would publicly disprove US air superiority claims, triggering political pressure to escalate or withdraw low-altitude assets.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Effective A-10/Apache interdiction of fast-attack craft is the practical precondition for insurance market reopening of Hormuz war-risk coverage.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Deploying legacy close-air-support platforms in a naval littoral role establishes doctrine for future peer-adjacent conflicts involving swarming small-vessel threats.

    Long term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #44 · Trump: 48 hours to destroy Iran power grid

Jane's· 22 Mar 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Russia
Russia
Russia vetoed the same renewal on 17 September, arguing that Britain, France and Germany never validly triggered the snapback that reimposed the pre-2015 UN resolutions. No panel was ever seated under that mandate, so the UN list decays fastest for states that screen against it rather than against the American one.
China
China
China vetoed renewal of the UN sanctions monitoring mandate on 17 September, arguing that Resolution 2231 terminated on 18 October 2025 and that the Security Council should drop Iran's nuclear file altogether. On that reading there is nothing to monitor, so the sanctions survive and their enforcement does not.
Iraq
Iraq
Baghdad saw the last American counter-Islamic State troops leave its territory on 30 September, completing a timetable it agreed with Washington in September 2024. Iraqi airspace deconfliction passes to Baghdad, which still has an open inquiry into the Maysan drone launches that has named nobody.
Pakistan
Pakistan
Treasury names Waseem Pasha Tajammal of Rawalpindi as the Cavalier group's chairman and places one of the designated incorporations in Islamabad. QatarEnergy separately told Pakistan that liquefied natural gas cargo cancellations would run through November, so Islamabad carries an enforcement question and a supply gap at once.
Turkey
Turkey
Treasury named a Cavalier Dynamics company incorporated in Istanbul among the ten nodes it designated on 29 September, and Ankara has published no response. Turkey imported a record 120,000 barrels a day of Indian diesel in August, cutting Russia's share of its diesel imports to 20 per cent.
India
India
Suraj Yadav, a wiper from Uttar Pradesh, was killed aboard the Cape Dao on 23 September, and 19 of the ship's 20 Indian crew were taken off alive. India's September imports ran at 575,000 barrels a day from Iraq and 566,000 from Saudi Arabia, back to pre-conflict rates.