Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
22MAR

A-10s and Apaches hunt Hormuz fast boats

4 min read
05:50UTC

The A-10 Warthog has dodged retirement for a decade. Its low-altitude deployment over the Strait of Hormuz is an assessment CENTCOM has not made verbally — that Iran's southern coastal defences can no longer threaten slow-moving aircraft.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

A-10 deployment signals US air superiority over Iran's littoral — one shootdown publicly disproves it.

A-10 Warthog ground-attack aircraft and AH-64 Apache helicopters are flying low-altitude combat patrols over the strait of Hormuz, hunting Iranian fast-attack craft and intercepting drones 1. The A-10 has a maximum speed of roughly 700 km/h, carries no stealth profile, and was designed in the 1970s to destroy Soviet armour columns on the North German Plain. The Apache is a terrain-following attack helicopter built to engage ground targets from behind ridgelines. Neither platform belongs in airspace where functioning surface-to-air missile batteries or coastal anti-aircraft systems remain operational.

Their presence over the strait is an operational assessment CENTCOM has not stated in words. Commanders would not commit these aircraft — among the most vulnerable in the US inventory to ground-based air defences — if Iran's southern littoral missile and anti-aircraft network were still capable of engaging low-altitude targets. The supporting evidence is specific. CENTCOM confirmed it used GBU-72 5,000-pound penetrator munitions against hardened coastal anti-ship missile sites along the Hormuz shoreline . More than 130 Iranian naval vessels have been destroyed in 22 days — a pace Adm. Brad Cooper called the largest naval attrition campaign since the Second World War 2. The target count has risen from 7,000 to more than 8,000 in days , with 8,000-plus combat sorties flown across the 22-day campaign 3.

Iran's IRGC Navy built its Hormuz doctrine around asymmetric swarm tactics: hundreds of small, fast fibreglass boats armed with anti-ship missiles and rocket-propelled grenades, dispersed across coastal inlets along Iran's 1,100 km southern shoreline. The strategy assumed the US would send capital ships into the strait's confined waters, where speed and numbers could offset technological disadvantage. Instead, CENTCOM appears to have systematically destroyed coastal infrastructure from the air before committing low-altitude platforms for the close-in fight. The A-10's GAU-8 Avenger — a 30mm rotary cannon firing up to 3,900 rounds per minute of depleted-uranium armour-piercing ammunition — was designed to penetrate tank hulls. Against unarmoured fast boats at close range, it does not need to. The US Air Force has tried to retire the A-10 at least five times since 2014; Congress blocked each attempt 4. Its return to combat in a maritime interdiction role its designers never envisaged is a function of two things: the IRGC Navy's degradation and the particular match between the A-10's low-speed manoeuvrability and the targets that remain.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The A-10 'Warthog' and Apache helicopter were built for one specific job: flying slowly at low altitude to destroy tanks and support ground troops. They were not designed for airspace where the enemy still has working anti-aircraft missiles — they are too slow and fly too low to survive that environment. Flying these aircraft over the Strait of Hormuz sends a deliberate signal: US commanders believe Iran's ability to shoot down aircraft in that area has been sufficiently destroyed. If that assessment is correct, the A-10s can effectively hunt and destroy Iran's small fast-attack boats before they threaten shipping. If it is wrong — if even a handful of shoulder-fired missiles or naval guns survive — these slow aircraft are highly vulnerable. The US has not formally declared air superiority over the Strait; the deployment is the evidence for the inference.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The inter-service dimension is analytically significant and absent from the body. Army Apaches and Air Force A-10s are solving a problem the Navy's force design created by never developing dedicated counter-IRGCN platforms. This reveals that Iran's anti-access investment — dispersed fast-attack craft, mines, and shore-based missiles — successfully exploited a structural gap in US force planning that blue-water naval doctrine consistently underweighted.

Root Causes

The US Navy's surface combatants were not designed to counter IRGCN swarming tactics at scale. The resort to A-10s and Apaches reflects a force-design gap: decades of US naval procurement optimised for blue-water peer competition and cruise-missile strike, systematically underweighting the close-range, high-density small-vessel threat Iran spent decades building as its primary anti-access strategy.

Escalation

The public deployment of slow, low-altitude platforms is itself an escalatory provocation — it dares Iran to contest air superiority by engaging them. A successful Iranian shootdown would publicly disprove US air superiority claims and create immediate political pressure to escalate or reposition, potentially broadening the conflict's geographic scope.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    US commanders have assessed Iranian air defences over the southern Hormuz littoral as sufficiently degraded to commit slow, low-altitude platforms to the theatre.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Risk

    A single A-10 or Apache shootdown would publicly disprove US air superiority claims, triggering political pressure to escalate or withdraw low-altitude assets.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Effective A-10/Apache interdiction of fast-attack craft is the practical precondition for insurance market reopening of Hormuz war-risk coverage.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Deploying legacy close-air-support platforms in a naval littoral role establishes doctrine for future peer-adjacent conflicts involving swarming small-vessel threats.

    Long term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #44 · Trump: 48 hours to destroy Iran power grid

Jane's· 22 Mar 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Oil market and P&I insurers
Oil market and P&I insurers
Brent cleared $87 intraday only once CENTCOM's blockade became physical rather than declared, even though P&I Clubs had already excluded Hormuz war risk a week earlier on 7 July: capital hedged ahead of enforcement, but prices moved only after it.
UAE reporting
UAE reporting
UAE reporting placed the Omani tanker deaths at one seafarer against the International Maritime Agency's count of two, the first time in this war that a Gulf state's casualty figures have diverged from an international monitor's.
Jordan
Jordan
Iranian strikes reached Jordan again on 14 July as part of the Gulf-wide retaliation for the Hormuz blockade, extending the conflict's geographic footprint to a state with no direct stake in the strait itself.
Bahrain
Bahrain
Bahrain sounded air-raid sirens on 14 July during Iran's Gulf-wide retaliation, the same day CENTCOM's blockade order and fourth night of strikes pushed the conflict's physical reach into the wider Gulf littoral.
Kuwait
Kuwait
Kuwait intercepted Iranian missiles and drones on 14 July as Tehran's blockade retaliation reached Gulf states beyond Iran's immediate shoreline, confirming Kuwaiti airspace now sits inside Iran's retaliatory envelope.
Oman
Oman
Oman absorbed the war's first tanker casualties in its own waters on 14 July, with two supertankers disabled and seafarers killed, putting the sultanate's shipping lanes directly in the path of the blockade fight for the first time.