Skip to content
Iran Conflict 2026
22MAR

A-10s and Apaches hunt Hormuz fast boats

4 min read
05:50UTC

The A-10 Warthog has dodged retirement for a decade. Its low-altitude deployment over the Strait of Hormuz is an assessment CENTCOM has not made verbally — that Iran's southern coastal defences can no longer threaten slow-moving aircraft.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

A-10 deployment signals US air superiority over Iran's littoral — one shootdown publicly disproves it.

A-10 Warthog ground-attack aircraft and AH-64 Apache helicopters are flying low-altitude combat patrols over the Strait of Hormuz, hunting Iranian fast-attack craft and intercepting drones 1. The A-10 has a maximum speed of roughly 700 km/h, carries no stealth profile, and was designed in the 1970s to destroy Soviet armour columns on the North German Plain. The Apache is a terrain-following attack helicopter built to engage ground targets from behind ridgelines. Neither platform belongs in airspace where functioning surface-to-air missile batteries or coastal anti-aircraft systems remain operational.

Their presence over the Strait is an operational assessment CENTCOM has not stated in words. Commanders would not commit these aircraft — among the most vulnerable in the US inventory to ground-based air defences — if Iran's southern littoral missile and anti-aircraft network were still capable of engaging low-altitude targets. The supporting evidence is specific. CENTCOM confirmed it used GBU-72 5,000-pound penetrator munitions against hardened coastal anti-ship missile sites along the Hormuz shoreline . More than 130 Iranian naval vessels have been destroyed in 22 days — a pace Adm. Brad Cooper called the largest naval attrition campaign since the Second World War 2. The target count has risen from 7,000 to more than 8,000 in days , with 8,000-plus combat sorties flown across the 22-day campaign 3.

Iran's IRGC Navy built its Hormuz doctrine around asymmetric swarm tactics: hundreds of small, fast fibreglass boats armed with anti-ship missiles and rocket-propelled grenades, dispersed across coastal inlets along Iran's 1,100 km southern shoreline. The strategy assumed the US would send capital ships into the Strait's confined waters, where speed and numbers could offset technological disadvantage. Instead, CENTCOM appears to have systematically destroyed coastal infrastructure from the air before committing low-altitude platforms for the close-in fight. The A-10's GAU-8 Avenger — a 30mm rotary cannon firing up to 3,900 rounds per minute of depleted-uranium armour-piercing ammunition — was designed to penetrate tank hulls. Against unarmoured fast boats at close range, it does not need to. The US Air Force has tried to retire the A-10 at least five times since 2014; Congress blocked each attempt 4. Its return to combat in a maritime interdiction role its designers never envisaged is a function of two things: the IRGC Navy's degradation and the particular match between the A-10's low-speed manoeuvrability and the targets that remain.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The A-10 'Warthog' and Apache helicopter were built for one specific job: flying slowly at low altitude to destroy tanks and support ground troops. They were not designed for airspace where the enemy still has working anti-aircraft missiles — they are too slow and fly too low to survive that environment. Flying these aircraft over the Strait of Hormuz sends a deliberate signal: US commanders believe Iran's ability to shoot down aircraft in that area has been sufficiently destroyed. If that assessment is correct, the A-10s can effectively hunt and destroy Iran's small fast-attack boats before they threaten shipping. If it is wrong — if even a handful of shoulder-fired missiles or naval guns survive — these slow aircraft are highly vulnerable. The US has not formally declared air superiority over the Strait; the deployment is the evidence for the inference.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The inter-service dimension is analytically significant and absent from the body. Army Apaches and Air Force A-10s are solving a problem the Navy's force design created by never developing dedicated counter-IRGCN platforms. This reveals that Iran's anti-access investment — dispersed fast-attack craft, mines, and shore-based missiles — successfully exploited a structural gap in US force planning that blue-water naval doctrine consistently underweighted.

Root Causes

The US Navy's surface combatants were not designed to counter IRGCN swarming tactics at scale. The resort to A-10s and Apaches reflects a force-design gap: decades of US naval procurement optimised for blue-water peer competition and cruise-missile strike, systematically underweighting the close-range, high-density small-vessel threat Iran spent decades building as its primary anti-access strategy.

Escalation

The public deployment of slow, low-altitude platforms is itself an escalatory provocation — it dares Iran to contest air superiority by engaging them. A successful Iranian shootdown would publicly disprove US air superiority claims and create immediate political pressure to escalate or reposition, potentially broadening the conflict's geographic scope.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    US commanders have assessed Iranian air defences over the southern Hormuz littoral as sufficiently degraded to commit slow, low-altitude platforms to the theatre.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Risk

    A single A-10 or Apache shootdown would publicly disprove US air superiority claims, triggering political pressure to escalate or withdraw low-altitude assets.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Effective A-10/Apache interdiction of fast-attack craft is the practical precondition for insurance market reopening of Hormuz war-risk coverage.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Deploying legacy close-air-support platforms in a naval littoral role establishes doctrine for future peer-adjacent conflicts involving swarming small-vessel threats.

    Long term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #44 · Trump: 48 hours to destroy Iran power grid

Jane's· 22 Mar 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
South Korean financial markets
South Korean financial markets
South Korea, which imports virtually all its crude oil, is absorbing the war's economic transmission most acutely among non-belligerents. The second KOSPI circuit breaker in four sessions — with Samsung down over 10% and SK Hynix down 12.3% — reflects an industrial economy unable to reprice energy costs that have risen 72% in ten days. The market response indicates Korean industry cannot sustain oil above $100 per barrel without margin compression across manufacturing, semiconductors, and shipping.
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
The first confirmed civilian deaths in Saudi Arabia — one Indian and one Bangladeshi killed, twelve Bangladeshis wounded — fell on communities with no voice in the military decisions that placed them in harm's way. Migrant workers live near military installations because that housing is affordable, not by choice. Bangladesh and India face the dilemma of needing to protect nationals who cannot easily leave a war zone while depending on Gulf remittances that fund a substantial share of their domestic economies.
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Aliyev treats the Nakhchivan strikes as a direct act of war against Azerbaijani sovereignty, placing armed forces on full combat readiness and demanding an Iranian explanation. The response is calibrated to maximise international sympathy while stopping short of military retaliation — Baku cannot fight Iran alone and needs either Turkish or NATO backing to credibly deter further strikes.
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
The Hormuz closure is an existential threat. Japan, South Korea, and India receive the majority of their crude through the strait — they will bear the heaviest economic cost of a war they had no part in.
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Neutrality was possible when the targets were military. 148 dead schoolgirls made it impossible — no government can explain that away to its own citizens.
Turkey
Turkey
Has absorbed three Iranian ballistic missile interceptions since 4 March without invoking NATO Article 5 consultation. Each incident narrows Ankara's political room to continue absorbing without Alliance-level response.