OFAC put the full text of General Licence X and of General Licence X1, the instrument that revoked it, into the Federal Register on Wednesday 30 September 20261. The Federal Register is the daily gazette where the American government has to print its rules before they bind anyone, and until that filing neither text was readable in full.
General Licence X was the June authorisation that briefly let Iranian crude be produced, sold and shipped, including by tankers already blacklisted. Issued on 21 June 2026 to run to 21 August, it expressly reached vessels blocked under seven sanctions programmes, the Iranian and the Russian ones among them2. Blocked means frozen out of any dealing with an American person or bank. General Licence X1 withdrew the authorisation in full on 7 July 2026, sixteen days after issue, allowing a wind-down only to 17 July3. The June text shows what Washington was prepared to allow; the July revocation shows what collapsed. Both became readable on 30 September. On 14 September we reported that no Iran-specific presidential document had reached the Federal Register at all.
The same day Treasury filed a rule rather than a licence. An executive order is an instruction from the President; the Code of Federal Regulations is the rulebook that corporate compliance departments and American courts actually read. Executive Order 13902, signed in January 2020, let Washington sanction anyone working in Iran's construction, mining, manufacturing or textile sectors. Treasury wrote it into 31 CFR part 560 on 30 September, six years on, effective the same day with no consultation period, at Federal Register volume 91, page 617594.
The rule also adds a note at 31 CFR 560.425. Property of the Government of Iran or of an Iranian financial institution is blocked under Executive Order 13599 whether or not the name appears on the Specially Designated Nationals list5, the blacklist that freezes a named party out of the dollar. A bank can no longer treat a missing name as a clean one, which removes a defence built on absence from the list and shifts the screening burden onto ownership research. A lawyer clearing a six-year backlog would file exactly these documents, and nothing in the rule says which it was.
