Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
7SEP

Iran fires missiles at two US warships

2 min read
14:39UTC

The IRGC fired ballistic missiles at a US aircraft carrier and a guided-missile destroyer on 5 September. CENTCOM says both ships evaded the attack unharmed; the IRGC says both were hit and withdrew.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Two governments give opposite accounts of the same missile attack, and no third party has published evidence.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) fired ballistic missiles at a US aircraft carrier and a guided-missile destroyer in the Arabian Sea on Saturday 5 September. US Central Command (CENTCOM) says both ships evaded multiple attacks and that no American personnel were harmed 1. The IRGC says the missiles found them, and that both warships took damage and withdrew 2.

The IRGC is the branch of Iran's armed forces that runs alongside the regular army and navy, with its own naval command. CENTCOM is the American combatant command responsible for the Middle East. Each account describes the speaker's own property: CENTCOM its hulls, the IRGC its missiles.

Nobody outside those two commands has published anything that would settle it. There is no third-party imagery, no damage assessment, no port call and no casualty record. That absence carries weight, because everything American forces did for the rest of Saturday was framed as an answer to this attack. CENTCOM had struck IRGC air defence, radar and mine-laying sites inside Iran on 1 September ; what followed this time was named hull by hull, and it answers a claim nobody outside Tehran and Tampa can check.

Contested claims have run through this phase of the war on both sides. Jordan said it intercepted missiles crossing its airspace on 31 August while the IRGC claimed a strike on Camp Titin . A warship is a harder object to argue about for long: hulls go into dock, crews rotate, reliefs are scheduled. Until one of those happens in public, the two governments have only each other's word to contradict.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or IRGC, is a branch of Iran's armed forces that runs alongside the regular army and navy and answers to Iran's own command structure. On 5 September it fired ballistic missiles, weapons that arc high into the atmosphere before dropping on a target, at two US Navy ships in the Arabian Sea: an aircraft carrier and a guided-missile destroyer, a smaller warship built partly to shoot down incoming missiles. The two militaries tell different stories about what happened next. CENTCOM, the US command for the region, says both ships dodged the missiles and nobody was hurt. Iran says the missiles found their targets and both ships pulled back damaged. Neither government has released a photo, a video, or anything else an outsider could check, so there is no independent way to say which account is true.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The IRGC runs its own naval command, separate from Iran's regular navy, and answers through the IRGC's own chain rather than the state's conventional military structure.

A missile launch at US warships is therefore a decision inside that separate command, which is why it does not by itself establish that Iran's wider armed forces have changed posture.

Escalation

No event in this topic's published record since 20 August has documented an Iranian strike aimed at a US Navy vessel; IRGC actions against shipping in that window targeted commercial tankers, not warships. A confirmed direct hit on a US warship, if it were independently established, would mark a change in category from attacks on shipping to attacks on a combatant naval unit.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    A confirmed missile strike on a US warship would be a new category of event for this war; every previously documented IRGC action against Hormuz shipping has hit tankers, not naval vessels.

First Reported In

Update #176 · Three tankers for two warships

U.S. Central Command· 7 Sept 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Iran fires missiles at two US warships
The American reprisal that followed is documented hull by hull, while the attack it answered rests on two governments' contradictory accounts.
Different Perspectives
Golden Global Yatirim Bankasi
Golden Global Yatirim Bankasi
Golden Global told Turkey's KAP on 4 September that the parties OFAC named are not its customers and it had no dealings with them. It plans to contest the designation.
CENTCOM (US Central Command)
CENTCOM (US Central Command)
CENTCOM says its ships evaded the IRGC's 5 September missiles unharmed, then disabled two Iranian tankers and destroyed a third within hours. Admiral Cooper named that three-for-two ratio himself.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
The IRGC Navy claimed strikes on six vessels, three tankers and three US-linked ships, on 5 and 6 September, naming none of them. It conceded its own tankers were hit.
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.