Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
3SEP

Brent jumps 6% as oil ends its shrug

2 min read
16:40UTC

Brent crude rose about 6 per cent to roughly $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, its biggest jump since the war's opening spike in March.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent jumped about 6 per cent, its biggest since the war's March spike, pricing escalation it had spent months ignoring.

Brent Crude rose to about $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, up roughly 6 per cent, with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) at about $74.82, its sharpest single-day rise since the war's opening spike in March . 1 Brent is the benchmark that prices about two-thirds of internationally traded crude, so a move of this size feeds petrol, diesel and airline fares within weeks. It had sat near $73 after the Al Rekayyat strike alone .

Prices fell through every earlier shock of this conflict. Brent dropped to $71.99 through the June bombing of Qeshm Island , and the second quarter closed down about 30 per cent, the steepest quarterly fall since 2020 . What moved the market this time was not one more incident but a strike and a retaliation landing in the same cycle, which raises the probability traders assign to an actual closure of the strait of Hormuz.

Saudi Arabia floated an expansion of a Red Sea pipeline to route crude around Hormuz, and tankers began making U-turns in the Gulf, according to trade reporting. 2 The thirty-five tankers that cleared the strait at pre-war rates on 2 July now move under a threat level the market has finally chosen to price. A Saudi pipeline, if pursued, is a multi-year structural hedge rather than a quick fix, and tanker diversions tighten Gulf supply just as OPEC+ was adding barrels.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent Crude and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) are the two main global oil price benchmarks. Brent jumped about 6 per cent in a single day, its biggest one-day rise of the whole war, after the CENTCOM strikes and Iran's Gulf retaliation raised fears that tankers moving through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway carrying roughly a fifth of the world's oil, could come under attack or be blocked. Saudi Arabia responded by floating a plan to expand a pipeline that would let its oil bypass Hormuz entirely by crossing overland to the Red Sea instead.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Oil traders price Hormuz risk through tanker insurance and freight rates as much as through headline events: P&I Clubs had already kept their Hormuz war-risk exclusion in force after the 7 July Al Rekayyat strike, meaning underwriters were signalling elevated risk before Brent moved.

Saudi Arabia's floated Red Sea pipeline expansion revives bypass capacity the kingdom has held since the 1980s Petroline system; reviving it now signals Riyadh expects further volatility rather than a one-off shock.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Saudi Arabia's Red Sea pipeline expansion, if pursued, would give Riyadh a durable hedge against future Hormuz disruption independent of any US or Iranian action.

  • Risk

    A sustained price spike above $80 would test whether P&I Clubs' war-risk exclusion pushes tankers to demand naval escort before transiting Hormuz.

First Reported In

Update #149 · The first thing Washington signed on Iran: a revocation

The National· 8 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.
Jordan's Armed Forces
Jordan's Armed Forces
Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.