Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
17AUG

Brent jumps 6% as oil ends its shrug

2 min read
15:37UTC

Brent crude rose about 6 per cent to roughly $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, its biggest jump since the war's opening spike in March.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent jumped about 6 per cent, its biggest since the war's March spike, pricing escalation it had spent months ignoring.

Brent Crude rose to about $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, up roughly 6 per cent, with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) at about $74.82, its sharpest single-day rise since the war's opening spike in March . 1 Brent is the benchmark that prices about two-thirds of internationally traded crude, so a move of this size feeds petrol, diesel and airline fares within weeks. It had sat near $73 after the Al Rekayyat strike alone .

Prices fell through every earlier shock of this conflict. Brent dropped to $71.99 through the June bombing of Qeshm Island , and the second quarter closed down about 30 per cent, the steepest quarterly fall since 2020 . What moved the market this time was not one more incident but a strike and a retaliation landing in the same cycle, which raises the probability traders assign to an actual closure of the strait of Hormuz.

Saudi Arabia floated an expansion of a Red Sea pipeline to route crude around Hormuz, and tankers began making U-turns in the Gulf, according to trade reporting. 2 The thirty-five tankers that cleared the strait at pre-war rates on 2 July now move under a threat level the market has finally chosen to price. A Saudi pipeline, if pursued, is a multi-year structural hedge rather than a quick fix, and tanker diversions tighten Gulf supply just as OPEC+ was adding barrels.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent Crude and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) are the two main global oil price benchmarks. Brent jumped about 6 per cent in a single day, its biggest one-day rise of the whole war, after the CENTCOM strikes and Iran's Gulf retaliation raised fears that tankers moving through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway carrying roughly a fifth of the world's oil, could come under attack or be blocked. Saudi Arabia responded by floating a plan to expand a pipeline that would let its oil bypass Hormuz entirely by crossing overland to the Red Sea instead.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Oil traders price Hormuz risk through tanker insurance and freight rates as much as through headline events: P&I Clubs had already kept their Hormuz war-risk exclusion in force after the 7 July Al Rekayyat strike, meaning underwriters were signalling elevated risk before Brent moved.

Saudi Arabia's floated Red Sea pipeline expansion revives bypass capacity the kingdom has held since the 1980s Petroline system; reviving it now signals Riyadh expects further volatility rather than a one-off shock.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Saudi Arabia's Red Sea pipeline expansion, if pursued, would give Riyadh a durable hedge against future Hormuz disruption independent of any US or Iranian action.

  • Risk

    A sustained price spike above $80 would test whether P&I Clubs' war-risk exclusion pushes tankers to demand naval escort before transiting Hormuz.

First Reported In

Update #149 · The first thing Washington signed on Iran: a revocation

The National· 8 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Kpler counted five Hormuz transits on 16 August against 31 the previous weekend, while Windward logged four vessels going AIS-dark for up to a month; underwriters price both the attacks and a sanctions register that names their counterparties in unreadable scanned images. Two trackers now measure only the ships that consent to be seen.
China
China
China sits at the end of the payment chain the 14 August designation targets: Iran's shadow banking network exists to convert sanctioned oil sales, much of it to Chinese refiners, into usable funds. Beijing has previously refused to recognise OFAC's jurisdiction over its own entities buying Iranian crude, leaving this designation to test compliance rather than change trade.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's foreign ministry denied on 16 August holding any Iranian pilots alive, contradicting Iranian General Mohammad Bagherzadeh's claim that Doha holds three Su-24 aircrew, and said it had recovered only one set of remains. Qatar carries Iran's messages to Washington, and this is a public break with Tehran over a fact only one aircrew inquiry can settle.
Oman
Oman
Oman's shipping-map talks, covering monitoring, environment and maritime services, were publicly decoupled from any Hormuz reopening by Iran's own foreign minister on 17 August. Muscat's mediation channel keeps functioning on the narrow file it was given, while the political decision it hoped to unlock stays with Iran's security council.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia separately called the recurrence of tanker attacks on Emirati shipping a dangerous escalation, breaking from the UAE's repeated formula. Riyadh speaking in its own name over an attack on another state's vessels signals it reads the pattern differently from Abu Dhabi's flat statements.
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
The UAE foreign ministry condemned a third ADNOC-linked tanker attack on 15 August in language identical, word for word, to its statement the day before. Three consecutive strikes on Emirati shipping have not moved Abu Dhabi's public wording by a single adjective.