Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
17AUG

Brent at $92 as premiums idle tankers

3 min read
15:37UTC

Brent reached $92.09 on Wednesday morning, a fourth straight daily gain, while war-risk premiums of 3% to 10% of hull value keep legal cargo sitting where it is.

← Back to A 35-party Iran action, invisible to searchJump to analysis ↓
ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Gulf cargo stays put because of what it costs to insure, not because of what blocks it.

Brent crude traded at $92.09 at 01:30 GMT on Wednesday 22 July, up 1.2% and its highest since 11 June, a fourth consecutive daily gain 1.

War-risk premiums for a Strait of Hormuz transit now run at 3% to 10% of a vessel's hull value, against 0.25% before the war 2. On a $100 million tanker that is $3m to $10m a voyage where it used to be about $250,000. The largest vessels are quoted $10m to $14m, and the charge falls on the charterer rather than the owner.

Whoever books the ship pays that premium up front and adds it to the delivered cost of the barrels. A buyer with any alternative supplier declines the cargo, and the charter is never fixed. So a legal, licensed, fully insurable parcel of crude sits where it is, because nobody at either end of the voyage will carry a $10 million charge the barrels cannot recover. The Lloyd's Market Association is explicit that cover remains available: what suppresses transits is price and crew willingness, not capacity 3. Underwriting resets slowly, and crews have longer memories than markets.

CENTCOM (US Central Command) frames the same water differently. Its 21 July statement says US forces have facilitated the transit of roughly 900 commercial vessels and 450 million barrels of crude "since early May", redirected eight vessels and disabled one 4. No date window is attached to the 900-vessel figure, so it cannot be set against the 66% weekly fall in transits recorded on 21 July . The two counts cover different things over different periods.

In a note dated 20 July, Daan Struyven of Goldman Sachs set out an upside case of Brent above $120 by the fourth quarter, conditional on Hormuz disruption persisting and Persian Gulf flows staying below roughly 45% of pre-war levels 5. Goldman's base case is $80 in the fourth quarter and about $75 in 2027 6. The higher number describes what happens if nothing changes, not what the bank expects.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent crude, the main international oil price benchmark, rose to $92.09 a barrel, its highest level since 11 June and the fourth straight daily rise. Oil often gets more expensive when investors worry that war could disrupt supply, even before that disruption actually happens. A lot of this price rise comes down to insurance, not ships actually being stopped. Sailing through the Gulf now costs shipping companies far more in war-risk insurance than before the war, and that extra cost is passed on. Insurers say enough cover is technically available, it has simply become expensive enough that some owners choose not to sail. Goldman Sachs, a major investment bank, has said oil could go above $120 a barrel later this year, but only if the situation gets significantly worse. Its actual expectation for now is closer to $80.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

War-risk premiums of 3-10% of hull value, not a shortage of naval capacity or insurance cover, are what is keeping tankers from sailing the Gulf, according to the Lloyd's Market Association. For the largest vessels, insurers are seeking $10-14 million per Hormuz voyage, a cost charged to the charterer rather than the shipowner.

Because that liability sits with charterers and crews rather than a fixed physical bottleneck, the decision to sail is a commercial one made voyage by voyage, which is why price continues climbing even as CENTCOM reports it is still moving substantial volumes through the strait.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    If Gulf flows fall and stay below roughly 45% of pre-war levels through Q4, Goldman's contingent $120+ scenario becomes the operative case rather than its $80 base case.

  • Opportunity

    Because the Lloyd's Market Association says insurance capacity remains available, a de-escalation could unwind the price premium quickly, as happened after the 1990 Gulf War spike.

Sources:CENTCOM·The National·Bloomberg
Mentions:Brent Crude →Lloyd's Market Association →Daan Struyven →Goldman Sachs →CENTCOM (US Central Command) →Strait of Hormuz →Persian Gulf →Kuwait →Brent-WTI →
First Reported In

Update #159 · A second strait closes by radio alone

CENTCOM· 22 Jul 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
Hormuz crossings fall by two thirds
The 66% weekly fall in Hormuz transits recorded on 21 July is the baseline against which the 22 July Brent rise and CENTCOM's throughput claim are measured.
Occurred 21 Jul 2026
Read story →
This Event
Brent at $92 as premiums idle tankers
Insurance pricing rather than naval capacity is what stops the ships, which is why Gulf traffic will not snap back when the shooting stops.
Led to
Brent tops $100 as the reroute closes
Brent's rise past $100 advances directly from the prior day's $92.09 close.
Occurred 22 Jul 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Kpler counted five Hormuz transits on 16 August against 31 the previous weekend, while Windward logged four vessels going AIS-dark for up to a month; underwriters price both the attacks and a sanctions register that names their counterparties in unreadable scanned images. Two trackers now measure only the ships that consent to be seen.
China
China
China sits at the end of the payment chain the 14 August designation targets: Iran's shadow banking network exists to convert sanctioned oil sales, much of it to Chinese refiners, into usable funds. Beijing has previously refused to recognise OFAC's jurisdiction over its own entities buying Iranian crude, leaving this designation to test compliance rather than change trade.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's foreign ministry denied on 16 August holding any Iranian pilots alive, contradicting Iranian General Mohammad Bagherzadeh's claim that Doha holds three Su-24 aircrew, and said it had recovered only one set of remains. Qatar carries Iran's messages to Washington, and this is a public break with Tehran over a fact only one aircrew inquiry can settle.
Oman
Oman
Oman's shipping-map talks, covering monitoring, environment and maritime services, were publicly decoupled from any Hormuz reopening by Iran's own foreign minister on 17 August. Muscat's mediation channel keeps functioning on the narrow file it was given, while the political decision it hoped to unlock stays with Iran's security council.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia separately called the recurrence of tanker attacks on Emirati shipping a dangerous escalation, breaking from the UAE's repeated formula. Riyadh speaking in its own name over an attack on another state's vessels signals it reads the pattern differently from Abu Dhabi's flat statements.
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
The UAE foreign ministry condemned a third ADNOC-linked tanker attack on 15 August in language identical, word for word, to its statement the day before. Three consecutive strikes on Emirati shipping have not moved Abu Dhabi's public wording by a single adjective.