Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
6AUG

Saudi jets hit Houthi sites at Hodeidah

3 min read
15:43UTC

Saudi Arabia bombed Houthi-held military sites around Hodeidah on 24 July. Coalition spokesman Turki al-Maliki said the port itself was untouched and three Red Sea harbours remain open.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Saudi Arabia bombed sites around Hodeidah while insisting the port and two others stay open to shipping.

Saudi Arabia flew air strikes against Houthi-held military sites around Hodeidah, the Yemeni Red Sea port city, on 24 July 1. Coalition spokesman Turki al-Maliki said the targets were sites used to threaten commercial shipping, that Hodeidah port itself was not hit, and that "Hodeidah, Ras Issa and Salif remain open to navigation" 2. Houthi-affiliated Al Masirah said the strikes hit telecommunications facilities and Kamaran Island, with a woman injured; the Coalition disputes those specifics 3.

Riyadh spent years bombing Yemen and then largely stopped, and these raids follow the missile strike the Houthis claimed against the Saudi tanker Layla two days earlier . Hodeidah is the entry point for most of the food and fuel reaching Yemen's north, where the population depends on imports for the great majority of its calories. Bombing near it without hitting it is a distinction al-Maliki went out of his way to draw.

That distinction has a history. Coalition strikes on Hodeidah's cranes and berths in earlier phases of the Yemen war drew censure from UN agencies and slowed aid throughput for months afterwards. Naming Ras Issa and Salif alongside Hodeidah tells insurers, charterers and the World Food Programme that the corridor is meant to keep functioning, which is a commitment the Coalition can be held to if the next round goes closer.

The two accounts of what was struck cannot both be right, and neither side has published imagery. A woman injured is the only human cost either party has put on the record from these strikes.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The Houthis are an armed group that controls most of northern Yemen and has Iranian backing. Saudi Arabia leads a military coalition that has fought them for years. After the Houthis hit a Saudi oil tanker, Saudi Arabia struck back at Houthi military sites near Hodeidah, a Yemeni port city the Houthis control. The Saudi military says it avoided hitting the port itself, which matters because that port is how most food and fuel reaches ordinary people in Yemen. Houthi-linked media gave a different account, saying the strikes hit communications facilities and an island, and that one woman was hurt. Saudi and Houthi-linked media disagree on exactly what was hit near Hodeidah.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The Houthis operate without a navy or air force but have built a missile and drone arsenal, developed with Iranian technical support, capable of threatening Red Sea shipping from fixed positions on Yemen's coast, which is what makes Hodeidah's surrounding military sites, rather than the group's negligible conventional forces elsewhere, the logical target for any Saudi response to a tanker strike.

Saudi Arabia's coalition faces a structural constraint the Houthis do not: Hodeidah port supplies most of the food and fuel reaching a Yemeni population already short of both, so any strike that damages port operations directly risks a humanitarian crisis that would cost Riyadh more in international standing than the military value of hitting it, explaining the coalition's repeated public assurances the port itself was untouched.

Escalation

Direction: escalatory but bounded. Saudi Arabia responded to a tanker strike within the same day rather than absorbing it, but both sides' public statements suggest an effort to keep the exchange contained to military targets rather than widen it toward the port infrastructure both sides depend on being left alone.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    A same-day Saudi response to the NCC Masa strike establishes that Riyadh will retaliate for tanker attacks rather than treat them as isolated incidents to absorb.

  • Risk

    Disputed claims over what was actually hit near Hodeidah, military sites versus telecommunications infrastructure, could become a point of escalation if Houthi-aligned media's account gains traction internationally.

First Reported In

Update #161 · Bahrain and Kuwait struck Iran, WSJ reports

Al Jazeera· 25 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Hengaw
Hengaw
The Norway-based monitoring group reported the Urmia executions of Omid Behzad and Pouria Safvat, the only source to do so, consistent with its documented pattern of recording far more executions than the Iranian state acknowledges. Iran's government has not confirmed either execution.
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
War-risk premiums price the Houthi campaign because the group announces its targets in advance, but a reopening Trump has promised without a published text gives underwriters no benchmark to reprice Hormuz cover against. Insurers want a text before they move rates, not a promise.
Houthi movement
Houthi movement
Spokesman Yahya Saree claimed strikes on two tankers in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden on 5 August, only one of which UKMTO could confirm. The group's campaign against shipping continues on its own schedule, independent of any Hormuz arrangement further north.
Oman
Oman
Muscat has brokered the coordinates both Tehran and Washington's wire sources now describe differently, but has published no account of its own. Oman's position depends on treating Hormuz as a shared route, which is not what Iran is currently describing.
United States Central Command
United States Central Command
CENTCOM raised its interdiction tally from 35 to 44 redirected vessels and disclosed its first boardings on 3 August, the day before Trump promised a reopening. The command's own enforcement record does not yet reflect the release the President has described.
Iran's Foreign Ministry
Iran's Foreign Ministry
Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei described the agreed Hormuz coordinates as a wholly new corridor under Iranian management, not a split of the existing route, days after his own deputy rejected Oman's lane proposal. Tehran wants the arrangement read as a change of ownership, not a compromise on access.