Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
13JUN

Hengaw Confirms 7,300 Killed; IRGC Used Schools and Mosques

2 min read
10:52UTC

Hengaw Human Rights Organisation published its overdue 9th casualty report on 2 April: 7,300 killed in 34 days, including 890 civilians, 180 minors, and 210 women. New findings document IRGC forces sheltering in schools, dormitories, and mosques.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

At 7,300 killed, Hengaw's count is 3.7 times Iran's official figure, with new evidence of IRGC use of protected buildings.

Hengaw Human Rights Organisation published its 9th casualty report on 2 April, five or more days overdue . The report confirms 7,300 killed in 34 days, including 890 civilians, 180 minors, and 210 women. The toll rose 400 from the previous floor of 6,900 . Iran's official count remains frozen at 1,937; state media separately reported 2,076, a figure that has drifted upward without acknowledging the discrepancy.

The gap between Hengaw's 7,300 and Iran's official 1,937 is now 3.7-fold. Both figures carry methodological caveats: Hengaw counts all conflict-related deaths across provinces; Iran's count uses a narrower definition. Hengaw's methodology is the more transparent of the two, and its prior reports have been broadly consistent with HRANA and other independent monitors.

The new element in the 9th report is the documented evidence of IRGC forces stationing in schools, dormitories, and mosques. Under the laws of armed conflict, using protected civilian buildings as military positions creates dual violations: one by the party using the shield, one potentially by the party that strikes through it. Both tracks will feature in any subsequent accountability process.

Hengaw's five-day publication delay is itself a data point. The organisation has published on a regular cycle since the war began. Delays correlate with access restrictions inside Iran, not with a lower toll.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran struck Kuwait's main oil refinery for the third time and also hit a water purification plant. The water plant matters more: in Kuwait, most drinking water comes from plants that remove salt from seawater. Attacking those plants threatens ordinary people's access to clean water, not just energy supply.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Iran's targeting of Kuwaiti infrastructure reflects its strategic calculation that raising the cost for Gulf states hosting coalition forces will create political pressure for those states to distance themselves from the US campaign.

Kuwait, like the UAE, hosts critical US logistics infrastructure; Iran is attempting to make that hosting unacceptably costly.

Escalation

Highly escalatory. The targeting of desalination infrastructure crosses from energy disruption into civilian life support targeting. Kuwait may face pressure from its population to seek accommodation with Iran, which would further erode the Gulf coalition supporting US operations.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Sustained desalination targeting in Kuwait (and potentially UAE or Saudi Arabia) poses a direct civilian welfare threat that could fracture Gulf political support for the coalition.

    Short term · Medium
  • Consequence

    Third strike on Mina al-Ahmadi suggests Iran has persistent targeting capability against the refinery despite coalition air defences; production disruption is increasingly likely.

    Immediate · High
  • Precedent

    Targeting of desalination infrastructure in an armed conflict, without triggering a specific IHL response, extends the permissive norm established by the Yemen campaign.

    Long term · Medium
First Reported In

Update #57 · Bridge strike kills eight; Army chief fired

Hengaw Human Rights Organisation· 3 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
Different Perspectives
Qatar (mediator)
Qatar (mediator)
Qatari negotiators flew to Tehran on Sunday morning to close remaining gaps between the parties, operating as the primary shuttle channel. Qatar's role is to bridge the civilian-track gap the IRGC veto has left.
IAEA / Rafael Grossi
IAEA / Rafael Grossi
Grossi replied to Araghchi's 13 June protection-of-materials letter the same day, citing Iran's NPT Safeguards Agreement obligation to declare any nuclear material transfer. With 97 days of lost inspector access and approximately 240 kg unaccounted, Grossi has treaty text and no inspectors on the ground to enforce it.
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
The UAE state oil company assessed full Hormuz flows will not resume until 2027 even with a fast deal, citing demining, inspection, and insurance timelines. The UAE ambassador to Washington said a simple ceasefire is not enough.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC ran naval exercises in Hormuz during Geneva talks and its political deputy declared Iran was negotiating from a position of strength. The corps has not endorsed the MoU; by amplifying Mashhad protests through Fars, it is framing any deal as conditions it imposed rather than a concession it accepted.
Iran Foreign Ministry / Araghchi
Iran Foreign Ministry / Araghchi
Araghchi's dilute-in-Iran red line was met by the US concession, but his foreign ministry spokesman said Tehran had not taken a final decision and a signing might come in days, not Sunday. Araghchi separately wrote to the IAEA pledging to protect nuclear materials as dilution negotiations advanced.
White House / US negotiating team
White House / US negotiating team
Washington accepted dilution inside Iran rather than ship-out, its first substantive material concession in 106 days, the New York Times reported. With the White House register blank and the ceremony slipped a third weekend, the administration has moved its negotiating position without yet producing a document.