Skip to content
Foundations rebuilt, and the first new thing is here: search across every topic, entity, and event.Try search
Iran Conflict 2026
11JUN

Brent settles $105.33, war's biggest week

3 min read
09:17UTC

Brent crude closed Saturday 25 April at $105.33 per barrel, up roughly 16% on the week despite an indefinite ceasefire announced five days earlier.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent's biggest week of the war registers a market that has stopped pricing the ceasefire and begun pricing the carriers.

Brent Crude settled at $105.33 per barrel on Saturday 25 April, the largest weekly gain (roughly 16%) since the war began and approximately 57% above the pre-war baseline of about $67 1. The settlement came five days after the indefinite ceasefire announcement that briefly knocked the contract back. Brent is the global crude benchmark used to price two-thirds of the world's traded oil; a move of this scale on a ceasefire week is a market correction against the underlying assumption.

Brent has now ignored two pieces of de-escalation paper inside a fortnight: the indefinite-ceasefire announcement and the Lebanon ceasefire extension on 23 April . Traders are pricing the inverse of the diplomatic track; the carrier concentration in CENTCOM AOR, the IRGC's verbal escalation and the AIS-blank Hormuz transits are now the dominant inputs.

Insurance, not navies, sets the structural floor under the price. With the major Protection and Indemnity clubs out of Iranian waters and war-risk premiums into double-digit millions per trip, the cost of moving a barrel through the strait has stepped up regardless of whether kinetic events occur on a given day. For European and UK forecourt prices, $105 Brent through the bank-holiday window keeps pump prices elevated; for Indian, Korean and Japanese refiners pricing forward cargoes, the unpriceable insurance leg is now the binding cost driver.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Oil prices track closely with what is happening in the Strait of Hormuz because roughly one-fifth of all the oil the world uses each day normally passes through that narrow waterway. When it is effectively closed, oil companies have to find other routes or buy from different suppliers, which costs more. On top of that, the shipping companies that carry oil have to pay enormous insurance premiums just to attempt a transit, adding further costs. The price at the petrol station reflects these extra costs within a few weeks. At $105 a barrel, you are paying roughly 20-25% more to fill your car than before the conflict started in late February.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    At $105/bbl sustained for three months, **UK** and **EU** inflation forecasts for mid-2026 will need upward revision of roughly 0.4-0.7 percentage points, complicating central bank rate-setting ahead of summer monetary policy meetings.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    The 16% weekly gain sets a new psychological floor for oil-market participants: each subsequent failed diplomatic round is now priced as a new price plateau rather than a temporary spike.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    Sovereign wealth funds in Gulf states whose budget breakeven sits at $87-95/bbl (Saudi Arabia and UAE) are now running significant surpluses that give them more patience than Western consumers to wait for a negotiated resolution.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #80 · Three carriers, zero instruments

Angle360· 26 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Oil markets / Lloyd's underwriters
Oil markets / Lloyd's underwriters
Futures markets priced CENTCOM's strikes-complete statement as a de-escalation signal and pushed Brent down 1.7 per cent to $94.71, even as the IRGC declared Hormuz closed. Lloyd's war-risk premiums held elevated because institutional de-listing requires a UN Security Council resolution that Russia and China have just shown they will block.
Pakistan (mediator)
Pakistan (mediator)
Interior minister Mohsin Naqvi carried dual civilian and military letters to Mojtaba Khamenei in Tehran on 6-7 June with no public response. The IRGC's Hormuz closure on 11 June shows the corps is acting independently of the channel Pakistan is using, making the mediation structurally unable to produce a binding commitment without direct IRGC access.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Russia and China voted against GOV/2026/40 at the IAEA Board, following through on the blocking position coordinated with Grossi in Geneva on 5 June; both states continue to oppose Western institutional pressure on Iran at every multilateral venue.
E3 and IAEA (UK, France, Germany)
E3 and IAEA (UK, France, Germany)
The E3 co-sponsored IAEA resolution GOV/2026/40, adopted 21-3-10 on 10 June, demanding Iran disclose 440.9 kg of unaccounted HEU and admit inspectors to four denied facilities. The 10 abstentions and Russia-China noes leave any Security Council referral without a viable enforcement path.
IRGC / Iran military command
IRGC / Iran military command
The corps declared Hormuz closed to all traffic on 11 June and claimed two vessels struck, overriding the MoU its own civilian negotiators were pursuing through Pakistan. The closure order used the Persian Gulf Strait Authority apparatus to convert a toll mechanism into a military prohibition.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump administration / CENTCOM
CENTCOM completed a second day of strikes on Tehran, Sirik and Minab, rejected the IRGC Hormuz closure as inconsistent with observed transit, and said strikes were complete. Hegseth framed the bombing explicitly as the negotiation: the method is coercive deal-making with no stated pause threshold.