Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
5JUN

Brent jumps 6% as oil ends its shrug

2 min read
08:43UTC

Brent crude rose about 6 per cent to roughly $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, its biggest jump since the war's opening spike in March.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent jumped about 6 per cent, its biggest since the war's March spike, pricing escalation it had spent months ignoring.

Brent Crude rose to about $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, up roughly 6 per cent, with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) at about $74.82, its sharpest single-day rise since the war's opening spike in March . 1 Brent is the benchmark that prices about two-thirds of internationally traded crude, so a move of this size feeds petrol, diesel and airline fares within weeks. It had sat near $73 after the Al Rekayyat strike alone .

Prices fell through every earlier shock of this conflict. Brent dropped to $71.99 through the June bombing of Qeshm Island , and the second quarter closed down about 30 per cent, the steepest quarterly fall since 2020 . What moved the market this time was not one more incident but a strike and a retaliation landing in the same cycle, which raises the probability traders assign to an actual closure of the strait of Hormuz.

Saudi Arabia floated an expansion of a Red Sea pipeline to route crude around Hormuz, and tankers began making U-turns in The Gulf, according to trade reporting. 2 The thirty-five tankers that cleared the strait at pre-war rates on 2 July now move under a threat level the market has finally chosen to price. A Saudi pipeline, if pursued, is a multi-year structural hedge rather than a quick fix, and tanker diversions tighten Gulf supply just as OPEC+ was adding barrels.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent Crude and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) are the two main global oil price benchmarks. Brent jumped about 6 per cent in a single day, its biggest one-day rise of the whole war, after the CENTCOM strikes and Iran's Gulf retaliation raised fears that tankers moving through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway carrying roughly a fifth of the world's oil, could come under attack or be blocked. Saudi Arabia responded by floating a plan to expand a pipeline that would let its oil bypass Hormuz entirely by crossing overland to the Red Sea instead.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Oil traders price Hormuz risk through tanker insurance and freight rates as much as through headline events: P&I Clubs had already kept their Hormuz war-risk exclusion in force after the 7 July Al Rekayyat strike, meaning underwriters were signalling elevated risk before Brent moved.

Saudi Arabia's floated Red Sea pipeline expansion revives bypass capacity the kingdom has held since the 1980s Petroline system; reviving it now signals Riyadh expects further volatility rather than a one-off shock.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Saudi Arabia's Red Sea pipeline expansion, if pursued, would give Riyadh a durable hedge against future Hormuz disruption independent of any US or Iranian action.

  • Risk

    A sustained price spike above $80 would test whether P&I Clubs' war-risk exclusion pushes tankers to demand naval escort before transiting Hormuz.

First Reported In

Update #149 · The first thing Washington signed on Iran: a revocation

The National· 8 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
International Group of P&I Clubs
International Group of P&I Clubs
The Group has kept its Hormuz war-risk exclusion in force through the entire shipping recovery, even as London hull war-risk premiums fell to about 2% of vessel value. A burning LNG carrier off Limah is now the fresh case for holding that line, with mutual pooling meaning one hit reprices the strait for every owner at once.
Jordan
Jordan
Jordan's government said no threats existed at Aqaba hours before Iranian missiles landed there, and has not addressed the IRGC's claim that Jordanian civilians and soldiers supplied targeting intelligence for the strike. Amman hosts forces it does not command and is saying as little as it can.
United States (CENTCOM)
United States (CENTCOM)
The Pentagon named two of the seventeen American dead, 1st Lieutenant Tyler Feehan and Private Isabella Gonzales, both killed at Jordan's Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, days after its Amman embassy had warned citizens away from Aqaba's airport and seaport. Washington is naming its own cost while flagging threats it declines to attribute publicly.
Iran
Iran
Iran said on Monday it disabled two oil tankers crossing the Strait of Hormuz without its permission, asserting a right to license passage through the strait it borders. Tehran named neither vessel, and CENTCOM had already denied a comparable Iranian claim on 18 July.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar moved from summoning Iran's deputy ambassador on 8 July to a dated written claim at the UN Security Council thirteen days later, citing Resolution 2817 and reserving its Article 51 right of self-defence. Doha is building a permanent record while still hosting CENTCOM's forward headquarters and mediating with Tehran.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM confirmed a third American service member died in northern Iraq on 19 July clearing unexploded ordnance from a downed Iranian drone, and recovered unidentified remains at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan. The Pentagon has framed its Khuzestan strikes as degrading IRGC capacity, a rationale that stretches to explain a reactor foundation with no nuclear material in it.