Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
3JUN

Brent settles $105.33, war's biggest week

3 min read
09:04UTC

Brent crude closed Saturday 25 April at $105.33 per barrel, up roughly 16% on the week despite an indefinite ceasefire announced five days earlier.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent's biggest week of the war registers a market that has stopped pricing the ceasefire and begun pricing the carriers.

Brent Crude settled at $105.33 per barrel on Saturday 25 April, the largest weekly gain (roughly 16%) since the war began and approximately 57% above the pre-war baseline of about $67 1. The settlement came five days after the indefinite ceasefire announcement that briefly knocked the contract back. Brent is the global crude benchmark used to price two-thirds of the world's traded oil; a move of this scale on a ceasefire week is a market correction against the underlying assumption.

Brent has now ignored two pieces of de-escalation paper inside a fortnight: the indefinite-ceasefire announcement and the Lebanon ceasefire extension on 23 April . Traders are pricing the inverse of the diplomatic track; the carrier concentration in CENTCOM AOR, the IRGC's verbal escalation and the AIS-blank Hormuz transits are now the dominant inputs.

Insurance, not navies, sets the structural floor under the price. With the major Protection and Indemnity clubs out of Iranian waters and war-risk premiums into double-digit millions per trip, the cost of moving a barrel through the strait has stepped up regardless of whether kinetic events occur on a given day. For European and UK forecourt prices, $105 Brent through the bank-holiday window keeps pump prices elevated; for Indian, Korean and Japanese refiners pricing forward cargoes, the unpriceable insurance leg is now the binding cost driver.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Oil prices track closely with what is happening in the Strait of Hormuz because roughly one-fifth of all the oil the world uses each day normally passes through that narrow waterway. When it is effectively closed, oil companies have to find other routes or buy from different suppliers, which costs more. On top of that, the shipping companies that carry oil have to pay enormous insurance premiums just to attempt a transit, adding further costs. The price at the petrol station reflects these extra costs within a few weeks. At $105 a barrel, you are paying roughly 20-25% more to fill your car than before the conflict started in late February.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    At $105/bbl sustained for three months, **UK** and **EU** inflation forecasts for mid-2026 will need upward revision of roughly 0.4-0.7 percentage points, complicating central bank rate-setting ahead of summer monetary policy meetings.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    The 16% weekly gain sets a new psychological floor for oil-market participants: each subsequent failed diplomatic round is now priced as a new price plateau rather than a temporary spike.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    Sovereign wealth funds in Gulf states whose budget breakeven sits at $87-95/bbl (Saudi Arabia and UAE) are now running significant surpluses that give them more patience than Western consumers to wait for a negotiated resolution.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #80 · Three carriers, zero instruments

Angle360· 26 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Brent fell to $89.25 on ceasefire probability, not new barrels, with traders voting for Trump's deed over Tehran's denial. Lloyd's has not repriced Hormuz war-risk cover because its trigger requires a UN Security Council resolution or government certification, so tanker insurance costs remain elevated regardless of the spot move.
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan's Mohsin Naqvi was in Tehran for his second visit in under a week, using the Pakistan-Qatar channel that delivered April's ceasefire after an identical public-denial cycle. The channel carries both civilian and military buy-in from Islamabad, the only configuration Iran's split command cannot dismiss as a partial signal.
India
India
India summoned the US Deputy Chief of Mission after three Indian sailors were killed aboard MT Settebello, the first formal grievance from a major non-belligerent directed at US enforcement. Indian seafarers supply roughly 12 per cent of the global maritime workforce; their presence on third-flag Gulf tankers is structurally inevitable regardless of bilateral diplomacy.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC declared Hormuz closed on 11 June while civilian negotiators were on the same mediation channel, then issued no public comment on the MoU framework. Its silence on the framework, rather than any foreign ministry statement, is the operative approval signal; the corps' unilateral Hormuz closure shows it did not treat the diplomatic track as binding on its operations.
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Esmail Baghaei told IRNA that reports of a finalised deal were 'merely speculation' and that Iran had 'not yet made a final decision'. The denial is structurally identical to Iranian foreign ministry statements during the April ceasefire talks, which produced a binding text within 48 hours of the same language.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump cancelled the third strike day and called the MoU 'very strong' and almost ready to sign, while CENTCOM kept tanker enforcement running in the same 24-hour window. The administration is simultaneously withdrawing the military pressure it claims drove the deal and sustaining the enforcement campaign it is trying to trade away.