Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
24MAY

Hengaw Confirms 7,300 Killed; IRGC Used Schools and Mosques

2 min read
14:49UTC

Hengaw Human Rights Organisation published its overdue 9th casualty report on 2 April: 7,300 killed in 34 days, including 890 civilians, 180 minors, and 210 women. New findings document IRGC forces sheltering in schools, dormitories, and mosques.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

At 7,300 killed, Hengaw's count is 3.7 times Iran's official figure, with new evidence of IRGC use of protected buildings.

Hengaw Human Rights Organisation published its 9th casualty report on 2 April, five or more days overdue . The report confirms 7,300 killed in 34 days, including 890 civilians, 180 minors, and 210 women. The toll rose 400 from the previous floor of 6,900 . Iran's official count remains frozen at 1,937; state media separately reported 2,076, a figure that has drifted upward without acknowledging the discrepancy.

The gap between Hengaw's 7,300 and Iran's official 1,937 is now 3.7-fold. Both figures carry methodological caveats: Hengaw counts all conflict-related deaths across provinces; Iran's count uses a narrower definition. Hengaw's methodology is the more transparent of the two, and its prior reports have been broadly consistent with HRANA and other independent monitors.

The new element in the 9th report is the documented evidence of IRGC forces stationing in schools, dormitories, and mosques. Under the laws of armed conflict, using protected civilian buildings as military positions creates dual violations: one by the party using the shield, one potentially by the party that strikes through it. Both tracks will feature in any subsequent accountability process.

Hengaw's five-day publication delay is itself a data point. The organisation has published on a regular cycle since the war began. Delays correlate with access restrictions inside Iran, not with a lower toll.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran struck Kuwait's main oil refinery for the third time and also hit a water purification plant. The water plant matters more: in Kuwait, most drinking water comes from plants that remove salt from seawater. Attacking those plants threatens ordinary people's access to clean water, not just energy supply.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Iran's targeting of Kuwaiti infrastructure reflects its strategic calculation that raising the cost for Gulf states hosting coalition forces will create political pressure for those states to distance themselves from the US campaign.

Kuwait, like the UAE, hosts critical US logistics infrastructure; Iran is attempting to make that hosting unacceptably costly.

Escalation

Highly escalatory. The targeting of desalination infrastructure crosses from energy disruption into civilian life support targeting. Kuwait may face pressure from its population to seek accommodation with Iran, which would further erode the Gulf coalition supporting US operations.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Sustained desalination targeting in Kuwait (and potentially UAE or Saudi Arabia) poses a direct civilian welfare threat that could fracture Gulf political support for the coalition.

    Short term · Medium
  • Consequence

    Third strike on Mina al-Ahmadi suggests Iran has persistent targeting capability against the refinery despite coalition air defences; production disruption is increasingly likely.

    Immediate · High
  • Precedent

    Targeting of desalination infrastructure in an armed conflict, without triggering a specific IHL response, extends the permissive norm established by the Yemen campaign.

    Long term · Medium
First Reported In

Update #57 · Bridge strike kills eight; Army chief fired

Hengaw Human Rights Organisation· 3 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
Different Perspectives
Lloyd's of London
Lloyd's of London
The Joint War Committee left Hormuz war-risk premiums at $10-14 million per voyage on 25 May, declining to move on Brent's 5% fall. The JWC's protocol requires a UN Security Council resolution or bilateral government certification letter before de-listing, and neither has arrived: a verbal understanding does not satisfy the formal condition the reinsurance market's treaty terms require.
Gulf Arab producers
Gulf Arab producers
Saudi Arabia and UAE depend on Hormuz for their own crude exports; Aramco CEO Nasser has warned no oil market recovery arrives until 2027 if the blockade continues past mid-June. Monday's $98.96 Brent settlement shortens nothing for Gulf producers without a signed instrument and a Pentagon mine-clearance timeline that runs up to six months post-ceasefire.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar holds $12bn of frozen Iranian assets at the centre of the sequencing dispute but cannot release them without explicit US Treasury authorisation, given the original freeze was a US instrument. As the asset-holding state, Qatar's leverage is real but passive: it is the escrow holder, not the decision-maker, and any resolution requires US Treasury sign-off that Trump has withheld.
Pakistan
Pakistan
With both Prime Minister Sharif and army chief Munir simultaneously in Beijing on 25 May, Pakistan has for the first time consolidated its civilian and military mediation tracks under China's roof. Munir's direct Tehran-to-Beijing flight signals that the security and financial threads of the sequencing problem are now being worked in parallel rather than sequentially.
China
China
Beijing hosted Pakistan's principal mediators and Iran's China envoy Ghalibaf simultaneously on 25 May while its banking regulator capped new state-bank lending to five sanctioned refiners. China is simultaneously the most credible third-party underwriter of the $12bn sequencing and the state whose institutions face live OFAC secondary-sanctions exposure if the deadlock persists through GL V's expiry.
United States
United States
Trump posted on 24 May that the blockade holds until a deal is certified and signed, ruling out the informal MOU structure both sides had been building. The 'certified, and signed' condition is the first operational bar Trump has attached in 87 days, but it arrived without an executive instrument, maintaining the gap between posted ultimatum and signed US policy.