Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
2MAR

Fifth front at Baghdad airport opens

2 min read
14:45UTC

A drone attack on Baghdad International Airport — where the US killed Qasem Soleimani six years ago — is the first military strike by Iraqi paramilitaries against the American forces they share bases with.

← Back to Friendly fire kills three US jets in KuwaitJump to analysis ↓
ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Attacking Baghdad International Airport — Iraq's primary civilian-military transit hub rather than a remote outpost — forces the Iraqi government into a public choice between its US security partnership and its Iran-backed militia constituents, a choice Baghdad has successfully evaded since 2019.

Saraya Awliya al-Dam claimed a drone attack on US forces at Baghdad International Airport on Monday morning — the airport where a US drone strike killed IRGC Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani in January 2020. The militia is part of Iraq's Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF), the umbrella of predominantly Shia paramilitaries formally incorporated into Iraq's security apparatus after the 2014 war against the Islamic State. The attack opens a fifth operational front in a conflict that began four days earlier against Iran alone.

Roughly 2,500 US troops at declared facilities in Iraq now face fire from armed groups they nominally partner with on counter-terrorism operations. Kataib Hezbollah, the most powerful Iran-aligned militia in Iraq, declared on Saturday that it "will not remain neutral". Saraya Awliya al-Dam's strike is the first act on that declaration. The Iraqi government has not commented — consistent with Baghdad's long-standing refusal to choose publicly between Washington and the militias whose fighters outnumber Iraq's conventional forces in several provinces.

The force protection problem is immediate. US personnel at Baghdad Airport operate within a shared military-civilian space in a city of nine million. Unlike an isolated forward base, the airport cannot be hardened without shutting down civilian aviation. The attackers hold Iraqi government identification and move freely through the capital. With four US service members now dead in under 72 hours, American forces are absorbing attacks from within the country they are ostensibly defending.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

An Iraqi militia has attacked US military positions at Baghdad's main international airport — the same facility used by civilian flights. This is significant because it is not a remote base: it is Iraq's primary gateway for travellers, diplomats, businesses, and humanitarian workers. The militia responsible is technically part of Iraq's own official security forces, creating an impossible situation where the Iraqi government cannot condemn the attack without effectively condemning a component of its own army — and cannot stay silent without normalising attacks on US forces inside Iraqi state infrastructure.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The choice of Baghdad Airport rather than a more isolated facility appears designed to internationalise pressure on the Iraqi government: airport disruption affects non-US actors including airlines, Gulf states with economic interests in Iraq, and the UN mission in Baghdad, creating indirect leverage on Baghdad that attacks on remote bases do not generate.

Root Causes

The Iraqi parliament's 2016 law formally integrating the PMF into the national security apparatus created a structural impossibility: the state simultaneously funds, commands, and is attacked by the same forces. The SOFA renegotiation process — triggered by the 2020 parliamentary non-binding resolution after Soleimani's killing — provided legal framing for militia attacks as assertions of Iraqi sovereignty, insulating them from government condemnation and creating a self-reinforcing permissive environment.

Escalation

Targeting Baghdad Airport escalates beyond the remote-base pattern of 2019–2024 and tests whether the Iraqi government will publicly choose sides. Baghdad's silence opens space for further escalation toward more strategically significant infrastructure; any public condemnation risks fracturing the governing coalition.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Iraqi government silence normalises militia strikes on shared civilian-military infrastructure, progressively narrowing Baghdad's ability to maintain the fiction of sovereignty over its own security forces and accelerating the collapse of the US-Iraq counter-terrorism partnership.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Risk

    Sustained attacks on Baghdad Airport could trigger airline suspensions beyond those already announced, effectively severing Iraq's civilian population from international air connectivity during a regional crisis that is already disrupting Gulf transit hubs.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Risk

    US retaliatory strikes against PMF-linked targets inside Iraq risk direct confrontation with formally integrated Iraqi security forces, which could unravel the counter-ISIS partnership, destabilise the Baghdad government, and create a power vacuum exploitable by remaining ISIS networks.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    Coordinated militia action while Iran itself is under bombardment demonstrates that the Iran-aligned network is executing a centrally directed multi-front strategy rather than a series of autonomous local decisions — with significant implications for the scope of any US counter-escalation response.

    Immediate · Assessed
Sources:CENTCOM·Times of Israel
Mentions:Kataib Hezbollah →National Security Council (Iran) →IRGC Quds Force →Iraqi Shia militias →Persian Gulf →Baghdad →Shia →Gulf States (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain) →Lebanon →United States →Iran →Hezbollah →Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) →Yemen →
First Reported In

Update #10 · Friendly fire kills three US jets in Kuwait

CENTCOM· 2 Mar 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
IAEA
IAEA
Director General Rafael Grossi appeared in person at the UNSC on 19 May and warned that a direct hit on an operating reactor 'could result in very high release of radioactivity'. The session produced a condemnation record but no resolution, and the Barakah perimeter was already struck on 17 May.
Hengaw (Kurdish rights monitor)
Hengaw (Kurdish rights monitor)
Hengaw documented three judicial executions and the detention of Kurdish writer Majid Karimi in Tehran on 19 May, establishing Khorasan Razavi province as the newest geography in Iran's wartime judicial record. The organisation's Norway-based operation continues to surface a domestic repression track running in parallel with every diplomatic and military development.
India
India
Six India-flagged vessels conducted a coordinated cluster transit under PGSA bilateral assurances during the 17 May window, paying no yuan tolls. New Delhi's inclusion in Iran's state-to-state passage track insulates Indian energy supply without requiring endorsement of the PGSA's yuan-toll architecture or alignment with the US coalition.
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan is the only functioning diplomatic bridge between Tehran and Washington. Its role is relay, not mediation in the settlement sense: it conveyed Iran's 10-point counter-MOU in early May, relayed the US rejection, and is now passing 'corrective points' in the third documented exchange of this sub-cycle without either side working from a shared text.
UK and France (Northwood coalition)
UK and France (Northwood coalition)
Twenty-six coalition members have published no rules of engagement eight days after the Bahrain joint statement; Lloyd's underwriters have conditioned war-risk reopening on written ROE from either Iran or the coalition. Italian and French mine-countermeasures deployments are operating on the in-water clearance task CENTCOM Admiral Brad Cooper's 90% mine-stockpile claim does not address.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Riyadh has not publicly commented on the Barakah strike or the 50-47 discharge vote. Saudi output feeds the IEA's $106 base case; the $5 Brent premium above that model reflects institutional uncertainty no Gulf producer can compress through supply adjustment alone.