Skip to content
Foundations rebuilt, and the first new thing is here: search across every topic, entity, and event.Try search
European Tech Sovereignty
10JUN

CIA and Mossad hunt for Khamenei

4 min read
10:31UTC

Thirteen days after being named supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei has not appeared in public. Western intelligence agencies cannot confirm he is alive and capable of command.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Western intelligence has no proof of life for Iran's wartime supreme leader after 13 days.

Mojtaba Khamenei has not been seen in public since the Assembly of Experts named him Supreme Leader on 9 March — thirteen days without a video appearance, a voice recording, or a verified photograph. His sole substantive act has been a written Nowruz message, read by a presenter on state television, claiming the "enemy has been defeated" and urging media to "refrain from focusing on weaknesses" . Every Supreme Leader since the Islamic Republic's founding in 1979 has delivered a televised Nowruz address in person . Mojtaba did not.

The CIA, Mossad, and allied intelligence agencies are actively searching for evidence that Khamenei is alive and functioning, Axios reported, citing US and allied officials 1. One US official stated: "We don't think the Iranians would have gone through all this trouble to choose a dead guy as The Supreme Leader, but at the same time, we have no proof that he is taking the helm" 2. A leaked audio recording obtained by The Telegraph — from Mazaher Hosseini, head of protocol for Ali Khamenei's office, speaking at a 12 March meeting — described Mojtaba stepping into his garden moments before ballistic missiles struck his home on 28 February. His wife and son were killed instantly. He survived with a leg injury, by "mere seconds" . Defence Secretary Hegseth subsequently claimed Khamenei is "wounded and likely disfigured." Trump told reporters on 10 March: "We don't know if he's dead or not... A lot of people are saying that he's badly disfigured" . The IDF has publicly named him as an assassination target — Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin stated on camera: "He is not immune. We will pursue him, find him, and neutralise him" .

Iran's constitution vests The Supreme Leader with sole command of all armed forces and sole authority to declare war or accept its end. The Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters — which issued the counter-threat to Trump's 48-hour power-grid ultimatum — reports directly to him. The Diego Garcia missile strike, which revealed a 4,000 km range Iran had publicly denied possessing, required authorisation from the supreme command level. If Khamenei cannot function, Article 111 of the constitution provides for a temporary three-member Leadership Council — the president, the head of the judiciary, and a Guardian Council jurist. This mechanism has never been activated, and its members lack both the IRGC's institutional loyalty and the theological authority The Supreme Leader holds as velayat-e faqih, the guardianship of the Islamic jurist that is the constitutional foundation of the office's power. Any diplomatic off-ramp also requires a counterpart with authority to agree terms — and it is unclear who that counterpart is. Iran is fighting a war in which the individual constitutionally responsible for both prosecuting and ending hostilities has not been verified as functional by any Western or allied intelligence service in thirteen days.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

In Iran's political system, the supreme leader holds authority above the president, parliament, and military. Generals require political authorisation before making decisions that could escalate to full-scale war. Mojtaba Khamenei was named to this role on 9 March — but has not appeared in public, spoken on camera, or issued any verified voice communication since. The CIA and Mossad are actively searching for proof he is alive and functional. This matters operationally: if no one with recognised authority can accept a ceasefire offer or authorise a military stand-down, the machinery for ending this conflict is missing a critical component at precisely the moment Trump's 48-hour ultimatum requires a functional Iranian counterpart.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The absence intersects with Trump's 48-hour ultimatum in a specific operational way. Ultimatums require a responsive counterpart with authority to comply. The US may be delivering demands to an entity that cannot functionally respond. Enforcement then becomes the default outcome: if no one can authorise compliance, the deadline passes regardless of intent — making strike execution structurally more likely independent of US resolve.

Root Causes

Iran's velayat-e faqih system concentrates decision-making in a single individual and provides no constitutional mechanism for managing a temporarily incapacitated leader. The rapid wartime succession — conducted under bombardment, without the usual public legitimation process — created a structural gap between formal title and operational authority. The Assembly of Experts, which theoretically oversees the supreme leader, has no precedent for intervening in a wartime leadership question and no institutional history of asserting such authority.

Escalation

A functioning supreme leader is the only figure in Iran's system who can overrule the IRGC's escalatory preferences. Without visible authorisation, the Khatam al-Anbiya HQ — which issued the civilian infrastructure counter-threat (Event 1) — may be acting with autonomous authority it does not formally possess. Military commanders making escalatory decisions without political oversight is the precise pathway to accidental or unintended escalation that conflict-termination theory identifies as most dangerous.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    IRGC commanders may be making escalatory military decisions without supreme leader authorisation, including the Diego Garcia strike and the civilian infrastructure counter-threat.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Consequence

    The 48-hour ultimatum mechanism is structurally compromised if no Iranian authority can formally receive, evaluate, and respond to it.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    Competing Iranian power centres — IRGC, Foreign Ministry, Assembly of Experts — may issue contradictory signals, making Iranian intentions unreadable to external actors.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Meaning

    The CIA and Mossad's active search for proof of life represents an intelligence priority shift from targeting to verification — confirming leadership uncertainty has become the dominant operational question.

    Short term · Reported
First Reported In

Update #44 · Trump: 48 hours to destroy Iran power grid

Axios· 22 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
CIA and Mossad hunt for Khamenei
Iran's supreme leader is the constitutional commander-in-chief and sole authority on war-and-peace decisions. His unverified status during active hostilities raises direct questions about who is authorising Iranian military operations — including the Diego Garcia missile strike and the counter-threat to Trump's power-grid ultimatum — and who possesses the authority to negotiate an end to the war.
Different Perspectives
European cloud and open-source industry
European cloud and open-source industry
European cloud providers gain a binding procurement mandate from CADA, confirmed by Gartner's $12.6bn sovereign-cloud figure for 2026. The $40bn Pax Silica commitment signals Brussels will not extend sovereignty discipline to the silicon layer, and the missing €350m Sovereign Tech Fund leaves open-source maintenance infrastructure unfunded beneath those same clouds.
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Science Secretary Kendall's £1.1bn Hardware Plan on 8 June chose demand-side instruments, advancing £150m to British chip startups via the British Business Bank, where Brussels chose supply-side alliance membership. Britain joined Pax Silica before the EU and has no collective EU procurement leverage; the Hardware Plan is the bilateral answer to the same silicon gap.
United States
United States
Pax Silica, a State Department initiative launched in December 2025, secured EU membership the same afternoon Brussels adopted its cloud sovereignty law. Ambassador Puzder had named CADA a red line against the EU-US trade framework; the narrowed CADA scope and the $40bn chip commitment together represent the settlement Washington sought.
France
France
France was the only EU state to oppose Pax Silica accession at COREPER on 3 June, asking the Commission to clarify the Council's steering role inside the alliance. Paris backed CADA and hosts Mistral AI; a $40bn US-chip commitment contractually narrows the commercial space for the sovereign AI model that France is trying to scale.
European Commission
European Commission
Von der Leyen framed CADA on 3 June as keeping 'most of our market open to like-minded partners', and the Commission's EVP Virkkunen simultaneously required majority-European ownership for the €4.12bn AI Gigafactories call. Brussels is managing rather than resolving the silicon dependency by asserting regulatory control at the cloud layer while formalising the chip relationship through Pax Silica.
European Central Bank
European Central Bank
The ECB's digital euro pilot drew more than 50 PSP applications and is naming 10 to 30 participants in July, advancing on its own monetary mandate without requiring a Commission act. Its trajectory this week is the inverse of CAIDA's: the sovereignty instrument that restricts no US firm is the only one keeping its published calendar.