23APR

Mojtaba's first named directives via IRIB

3 min read

09:21UTC

Iran's state broadcaster attributed military directives to Mojtaba Khamenei by name on 14 May, the first time since the war began that operational orders have been credited to a Supreme Leader who has not been seen alive in public since 28 February.

← Back to Sovereignty summit, minus the sovereigns Jump to analysis ↓

TechnologyDeveloping

Key takeaway

Iran's war paper is now signed by a Supreme Leader unseen in public since 28 February.

Iran's state broadcaster IRIB (Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting) reported on Thursday that Mojtaba Khamenei has issued "new and decisive directives" for military operations ¹. The attribution is the first time since 28 February that Iran's media apparatus has formally named the country's POST-March leadership as the source of active operational guidance, rather than political commentary. No confirming broadcast, recorded address, or authenticated communication accompanied the document. Mojtaba's 17-day absence had been reported by 30 March and has now extended through 77 days of war .

Mojtaba was appointed by the Assembly of Experts in an emergency online session on 7 March after Israeli strikes killed his father Ali Khamenei on 28 February. Thursday's directives describe military operations rather than political guidance, the form successor leaders typically reserve for periods of consolidated authority. The Islamic Republic's institutional design separates religious authority from operational command: the IRGC reports to The Supreme Leader directly, while the regular army Artesh reports through the General Staff. A directive "for military operations" attributed to the office of The Supreme Leader sits across both reporting lines.

Article 109 of Iran's constitution requires The Supreme Leader to hold marja theological credentials. Mojtaba does not. Eight Assembly of Experts members boycotted the 7 March vote citing IRGC pressure. Thursday's directives bypass that gap rather than resolve it. An invisible Supreme Leader cannot be deposed, contradicted, or interrogated, which means the 56-year-old IRGC pick is structurally insulated by his own opacity. Mohammad Mokhber, Mojtaba's senior adviser and acting head of government, had been carrying the public operational voice on Hormuz doctrine through the prior week without requiring a Supreme Leader appearance.

The pattern mirrors, from the Iranian side, the gap on the American side: instruments are issued on both sides, but the issuing authority on each side cannot be verified by the other. Washington produces speeches without paper. Tehran now produces paper without a visible signatory.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran is run by a Supreme Leader, a religious figure with ultimate authority over the military, judiciary, and government. Iran's constitution says this person must be a senior Islamic scholar of the highest rank. When the previous Supreme Leader was killed in February 2026, his son Mojtaba Khamenei was given the role despite not having those qualifications. On 14 May, Iran's state television reported that Mojtaba had issued military orders. But Mojtaba has not appeared on camera or in public for 77 days. Nobody has confirmed the order came from him directly. IRIB published the directives as a document only, with no video, recorded voice, or live broadcast from Mojtaba accompanying it. When a country's leader has not been seen for nearly three months, and decisions attributed to him come only as unverified documents, it raises real questions about who is actually making the decisions.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Iran's constitutional requirement under Article 109 that the Supreme Leader hold marja (senior clerical) status created an insurmountable gap for Mojtaba, whose clerical credentials do not meet the standard. The Assembly of Experts' emergency appointment on 7 March bypassed this requirement under wartime emergency powers, but at least eight members boycotted the vote citing IRGC pressure.

The IRGC's role as institutional kingmaker reflects 47 years of expansion: the corps now controls significant portions of the Iranian economy, the Revolutionary Courts, and the intelligence apparatus. An IRGC-backed Supreme Leader without independent clerical authority consolidates the corps' power but creates a self-reinforcing dependency: Mojtaba needs IRGC institutional support to govern; the IRGC needs an attributable Supreme Leader to legitimise its operations externally.

What could happen next?

The 77-day public absence, combined with attributed directives issued through state broadcaster without authentication, makes it impossible for external parties to confirm whether Mojtaba is alive, incapacitated, or willingly absent; negotiations requiring authorised Iranian sign-off face a counterparty verification problem.
Immediate · 0.75
Risk
If the IRGC is issuing directives in Mojtaba's name without his participation, any ceasefire or nuclear agreement attributed to Supreme Leader authority would lack constitutional legitimacy and could be repudiated after the fact.
Short term · 0.62
Consequence
The IRIB attribution mechanism normalises document-only command attribution in Iranian state media, providing the IRGC with an institutional tool to claim Supreme Leader authorisation for future operations without requiring Mojtaba's visible participation.
Medium term · 0.7

Source Landscape

This story draws on mixed-leaning sources from United Kingdom

United Kingdom

Primary parallel: Kim Jong-un's 2020 absence from North Korean state media for 41 days, during which attributed directives continued to emerge. When he reappeared, South Korean intelligence confirmed he had undergone cardiovascular surgery.

The North Korean parallel is structurally relevant: an authoritarian system can sustain attributed command through a non-appearing leader for weeks or months, but operational gaps accumulate as field commanders require real-time authorisation decisions that cannot wait for courier-delivered paper.

Counter-parallel: The 1989 Khomeini-to-Khamenei succession is the closer constitutional precedent. Khamenei was a mid-ranking cleric without marja credentials when appointed, prompting emergency constitutional revision to remove the marja requirement before his appointment could stand. Iran did not revise Article 109 for Mojtaba; it simply proceeded with the appointment under boycott conditions. That structural difference means the 1989 precedent provides a path but not a blueprint.

Consensus view: The Council on Foreign Relations' Karim Sadjadpour and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy's Ali Alfoneh have both documented that the Islamic Republic's governance model requires The Supreme Leader to be personally visible to maintain the velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist) doctrine's legitimacy.

A directive attributed via state broadcaster without video confirmation, recorded voice, or independent verification is constitutionally anomalous. It functions as a placeholder command rather than a legitimate exercise of Supreme Leader authority.

Counter-view: Carnegie Tehran's Mahsa Rouhi argues the directive's form reveals IRGC institutional logic rather than constitutional weakness. The IRGC does not require theological validation to execute operations; it requires a documented order in the chain of command.

IRIB's attribution creates that paper trail without requiring Mojtaba to appear publicly and expose his location during wartime. The document satisfies IRGC bureaucratic requirements without engaging the marja credentials question.

Key tension: Whether Mojtaba's 77-day public absence reflects deliberate wartime operational security or a physical incapacity that makes genuine Supreme Leader governance impossible, with the IRGC filling the authority gap through document attribution.

Sources:Iran International (citing IRIB)·Iran International (citing IRIB)

Mentions:Mokhber →Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) →Article 111 →Mojtaba Khamenei →Assembly of Experts →IRIB →Council on Foreign Relations →Iran →Iranian Army →Tehran →Washington →Karim Sadjadpour →Washington Institute for Near East Policy →Ali Khamenei →

First Reported In

Update #98 · Three pledges, no paper, twelve sanctions

Iran International (citing IRIB)· 15 May 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Iranian drones hit UAE, Kuwait, Qatar in one morning

Iranian drone strikes on UAE, Kuwait and Qatar on 10 May showed IRGC widening beyond the strait; the Hui Chuan seizure at anchor outside transit lanes on 14 May continued that perimeter expansion.

Occurred 10 May 2026

Read story →

This Event

Mojtaba's first named directives via IRIB

Iran is now running war paper signed by a man no adversary or ally has visually confirmed alive in 77 days. The constitutional gap that produced his appointment remains unaddressed.

Different Perspectives

United States (Google/Alphabet)

Alphabet lost its final Android appeal on 2 July with no further court to hear it, a result its Computer and Communications Industry Association allies frame as precedent, not deterrence, since the €4.1bn fine changed nothing about Google's Play Store terms across eight years of litigation.

UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

DSIT opened its £96m second Sovereign AI wave on 3 July, switching from April's equity stakes to fixed-price contracts because Britain has no domestic hyperscaler or Bpifrance-style lender to fund capacity another way. It is betting on buying outcomes it controls alone rather than joining an EU-wide framework.

German federal government

Berlin backed both German deliverables this week, Infineon's fab and Aleph Alpha's merger, but is finding one far harder to close than the other. It wants enforceable protective rights inside Cohere's cap table before the merger closes, a legal instrument the Bundeskartellamt has no filing to review yet.

European Commission

The Commission banked a clean CJEU win on the eight-year Android case on 2 July, removing Google's last comparator argument before President von der Leyen rules on the far larger DMA self-preferencing fine due 27 July. Brussels treats Infineon's early Dresden delivery as proof the Chips Act mechanism works, at the node Europe already led.

Bruegel (EU industry sceptics)

Bruegel economist Mario Mariniello argued the EU sovereignty package mimics US and Chinese strategy while EU cloud providers hold roughly 15% of their home market; using nationality as a proxy for security without fixing the underlying capital and energy gaps that drive the dependency creates €86bn of migration cost without the security benefit it is sold as delivering.

France

France published a joint sovereignty definition with Germany at VivaTech and mobilised €13bn under Tibi Phase 3, placing SAP's partnership with Mistral as the working proof that a German enterprise-software giant running a French sovereign model inside public administration is what digital sovereignty looks like in practice.