Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
15JUN

Oil prices a Hormuz reopening that has not happened

4 min read
11:33UTC

Brent crude fell to about $77.22 on 18 June, a pre-war level, while not one tanker resumed transit, insurers kept the strait excluded and the mines stayed live. The market is reading the signature; the water disagrees.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent is pricing a reopening that no insurer, mine crew or transit log has yet confirmed on the water.

Brent Crude, the benchmark that sets the price of roughly two-thirds of internationally traded oil, fell to about $77.22 on 18 June, down 6.9 per cent from $82.98 and back to a level last seen before the war 1. Traders treated the signed Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) as a completed reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Not one tanker resumed transit.

The physical strait tells a different story from the screen. No Protection and Indemnity (P&I) club, the mutual insurers that cover roughly 90 per cent of ocean-going tonnage, has lifted its Hormuz war-risk exclusion; premiums sit at four to twenty times pre-war levels, and transits run near 6 per cent of baseline . Mine-clearance crews are still working uncleared waters: an IRGC vessel issued a radio warning to a US warship during that work on signing day. None of that has reached the insurance market that decides whether a hull moves.

Brent had touched $87.33 only days earlier and slipped below $90 when the ceasefire first looked probable ; the slide now prices an operational resumption rather than a rising probability of one. If the OFAC waiver never lands, or the 60-day toll-free window lapses into a fee, the gap between paper and water closes upward. Brent at $77 runs several weeks ahead of any operational change in the strait itself.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Financial markets and physical ships operate on different clocks. Traders in London can reprice oil within seconds of reading a news headline. A tanker captain deciding whether to sail through the Strait of Hormuz needs to know the mines have been cleared, that his insurance still covers him, and that an armed vessel will not stop him halfway through. On 18 June, Brent fell 6.9% to $77.22 as traders priced the deal as a completed reopening. Yet BIMCO, the world's largest shipowner association, confirmed no P&I club had lifted its war-risk exclusion. CENTCOM's two carrier groups continued redirecting vessels. Iranian-laid mines remained uncleared. Zero commercial tankers completed a Hormuz transit that day. The price moved; the strait did not.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If no commercial tanker completes a Hormuz transit by 25 June, Brent is likely to rebound toward $82 to $84 as traders recognise the physical-to-paper gap.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Saudi Arabia's four idle supergiant fields , representing 2 to 2.5 million barrels per day of capacity , will not restart until owners confirm Hormuz is operationally clear, because VLCC loading at Safaniya and Ras Tanura exits via the strait.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Opportunity

    The first commercial VLCC completing a Hormuz transit under P&I cover would be the most significant operational market signal since the conflict began, likely accelerating the Brent decline by a further $3 to $5.

    Short term · Reported
First Reported In

Update #131 · Iran deal's first death tests the text

CNBC· 18 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.